Comparative evaluation of fracture resistance of simulated immature teeth restored with apical plugs of mineral trioxide aggregate, Biodentine, and bone cement: An in vitro study

Aim: This in vitro study aimed to compare the fracture resistance of simulated immature permanent teeth restored with apical plugs of mineral trioxide aggregate (MTA), Biodentine, and bone cement. Methods: Forty-eight single-rooted human maxillary central incisors were selected and decoronated 6 mm...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Swapnika Gudapati, R Kalyan Satish, Girija S Sajjan, K Madhu Varma, V Santosh Kumar, M Sitaram Kumar
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications 2023-01-01
Series:Endodontology
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.endodontologyonweb.org/article.asp?issn=0970-7212;year=2023;volume=35;issue=1;spage=30;epage=34;aulast=Gudapati
_version_ 1797824420127965184
author Swapnika Gudapati
R Kalyan Satish
Girija S Sajjan
K Madhu Varma
V Santosh Kumar
M Sitaram Kumar
author_facet Swapnika Gudapati
R Kalyan Satish
Girija S Sajjan
K Madhu Varma
V Santosh Kumar
M Sitaram Kumar
author_sort Swapnika Gudapati
collection DOAJ
description Aim: This in vitro study aimed to compare the fracture resistance of simulated immature permanent teeth restored with apical plugs of mineral trioxide aggregate (MTA), Biodentine, and bone cement. Methods: Forty-eight single-rooted human maxillary central incisors were selected and decoronated 6 mm above and 9 mm below the cementoenamel junction to simulate the immature teeth. Based on weight and homogeneity, the samples were distributed into three experimental groups (n = 12) and one control group (n = 12). In all the experimental group samples, a peeso reamer size 5 was stepped out 1 mm beyond the apex to enlarge the apices to a diameter of 1.5 mm. Apical plugs of MTA Plus (Prevest DenPro Limited, India), Biodentine (Septodont, France), and Bone cement (Surgical Simplex P, Stryker, Australia) were placed to 4 mm, and obturation was done using gutta-percha and AH Plus® sealer (Dentsply DeTrey, Konstanz, Germany). The force was applied at 45° angulation until fracture, using the universal testing machine. The results were analyzed using a one-way analysis of variance followed by Tukey's post hoc test at a 95% confidence level. Results: The Biodentine group showed a statistically higher fracture resistance value than the MTA Plus and bone cement group (P = 0.014 and P = 0.016, respectively). No statistically significant difference was reported between MTA Plus and the bone cement group. Conclusion: Within the limitations of this study, using Biodentine as an apical plug increases the fracture resistance of immature teeth. Bone cement can be used as a viable alternative to MTA.
first_indexed 2024-03-13T10:37:42Z
format Article
id doaj.art-149f9bac44464f8c8dd5b8778cc0cace
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 0970-7212
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-13T10:37:42Z
publishDate 2023-01-01
publisher Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications
record_format Article
series Endodontology
spelling doaj.art-149f9bac44464f8c8dd5b8778cc0cace2023-05-18T05:16:26ZengWolters Kluwer Medknow PublicationsEndodontology0970-72122023-01-01351303410.4103/endo.endo_21_22Comparative evaluation of fracture resistance of simulated immature teeth restored with apical plugs of mineral trioxide aggregate, Biodentine, and bone cement: An in vitro studySwapnika GudapatiR Kalyan SatishGirija S SajjanK Madhu VarmaV Santosh KumarM Sitaram KumarAim: This in vitro study aimed to compare the fracture resistance of simulated immature permanent teeth restored with apical plugs of mineral trioxide aggregate (MTA), Biodentine, and bone cement. Methods: Forty-eight single-rooted human maxillary central incisors were selected and decoronated 6 mm above and 9 mm below the cementoenamel junction to simulate the immature teeth. Based on weight and homogeneity, the samples were distributed into three experimental groups (n = 12) and one control group (n = 12). In all the experimental group samples, a peeso reamer size 5 was stepped out 1 mm beyond the apex to enlarge the apices to a diameter of 1.5 mm. Apical plugs of MTA Plus (Prevest DenPro Limited, India), Biodentine (Septodont, France), and Bone cement (Surgical Simplex P, Stryker, Australia) were placed to 4 mm, and obturation was done using gutta-percha and AH Plus® sealer (Dentsply DeTrey, Konstanz, Germany). The force was applied at 45° angulation until fracture, using the universal testing machine. The results were analyzed using a one-way analysis of variance followed by Tukey's post hoc test at a 95% confidence level. Results: The Biodentine group showed a statistically higher fracture resistance value than the MTA Plus and bone cement group (P = 0.014 and P = 0.016, respectively). No statistically significant difference was reported between MTA Plus and the bone cement group. Conclusion: Within the limitations of this study, using Biodentine as an apical plug increases the fracture resistance of immature teeth. Bone cement can be used as a viable alternative to MTA.http://www.endodontologyonweb.org/article.asp?issn=0970-7212;year=2023;volume=35;issue=1;spage=30;epage=34;aulast=Gudapatiapexificationbiodentinebone cementfracture resistanceimmature teethmineral trioxide aggregate
spellingShingle Swapnika Gudapati
R Kalyan Satish
Girija S Sajjan
K Madhu Varma
V Santosh Kumar
M Sitaram Kumar
Comparative evaluation of fracture resistance of simulated immature teeth restored with apical plugs of mineral trioxide aggregate, Biodentine, and bone cement: An in vitro study
Endodontology
apexification
biodentine
bone cement
fracture resistance
immature teeth
mineral trioxide aggregate
title Comparative evaluation of fracture resistance of simulated immature teeth restored with apical plugs of mineral trioxide aggregate, Biodentine, and bone cement: An in vitro study
title_full Comparative evaluation of fracture resistance of simulated immature teeth restored with apical plugs of mineral trioxide aggregate, Biodentine, and bone cement: An in vitro study
title_fullStr Comparative evaluation of fracture resistance of simulated immature teeth restored with apical plugs of mineral trioxide aggregate, Biodentine, and bone cement: An in vitro study
title_full_unstemmed Comparative evaluation of fracture resistance of simulated immature teeth restored with apical plugs of mineral trioxide aggregate, Biodentine, and bone cement: An in vitro study
title_short Comparative evaluation of fracture resistance of simulated immature teeth restored with apical plugs of mineral trioxide aggregate, Biodentine, and bone cement: An in vitro study
title_sort comparative evaluation of fracture resistance of simulated immature teeth restored with apical plugs of mineral trioxide aggregate biodentine and bone cement an in vitro study
topic apexification
biodentine
bone cement
fracture resistance
immature teeth
mineral trioxide aggregate
url http://www.endodontologyonweb.org/article.asp?issn=0970-7212;year=2023;volume=35;issue=1;spage=30;epage=34;aulast=Gudapati
work_keys_str_mv AT swapnikagudapati comparativeevaluationoffractureresistanceofsimulatedimmatureteethrestoredwithapicalplugsofmineraltrioxideaggregatebiodentineandbonecementaninvitrostudy
AT rkalyansatish comparativeevaluationoffractureresistanceofsimulatedimmatureteethrestoredwithapicalplugsofmineraltrioxideaggregatebiodentineandbonecementaninvitrostudy
AT girijassajjan comparativeevaluationoffractureresistanceofsimulatedimmatureteethrestoredwithapicalplugsofmineraltrioxideaggregatebiodentineandbonecementaninvitrostudy
AT kmadhuvarma comparativeevaluationoffractureresistanceofsimulatedimmatureteethrestoredwithapicalplugsofmineraltrioxideaggregatebiodentineandbonecementaninvitrostudy
AT vsantoshkumar comparativeevaluationoffractureresistanceofsimulatedimmatureteethrestoredwithapicalplugsofmineraltrioxideaggregatebiodentineandbonecementaninvitrostudy
AT msitaramkumar comparativeevaluationoffractureresistanceofsimulatedimmatureteethrestoredwithapicalplugsofmineraltrioxideaggregatebiodentineandbonecementaninvitrostudy