Soil and crop responses to controlled traffic farming in reduced tillage and no-till: some experiences from field experiments and on-farm studies in Sweden
The purpose of this study was to investigate the impact of controlled traffic farming (CTF) with respect to soil physical properties and crop yield for Swedish conditions. Three field trials were conducted for six growing seasons in central and southern Sweden. In two of the trials, we compared CTF...
Main Authors: | , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Taylor & Francis Group
2020-05-01
|
Series: | Acta Agriculturae Scandinavica. Section B, Soil and Plant Science |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/09064710.2020.1728372 |
_version_ | 1797684379145732096 |
---|---|
author | Ararso Etana Lena Holm Tomas Rydberg Thomas Keller |
author_facet | Ararso Etana Lena Holm Tomas Rydberg Thomas Keller |
author_sort | Ararso Etana |
collection | DOAJ |
description | The purpose of this study was to investigate the impact of controlled traffic farming (CTF) with respect to soil physical properties and crop yield for Swedish conditions. Three field trials were conducted for six growing seasons in central and southern Sweden. In two of the trials, we compared CTF with random traffic farming (RTF) in deep chiseling (DC, 15–20 cm), shallow cultivation (SC, 5–10 cm) and no-till. The third trial was on farm study by using the existing CTF module at the farm. In the tracks of CTF (traffic zone) dry bulk density was increased and water movement was decreased. Soil penetration resistance was greater in the traffic zone than in the crop zone in some of the trials but the difference was not statistically significant. On average, crop yield was similar between CTF and RTF for all trials. Yield in the traffic zone was significantly less than that in the crop zone in the on-farm trial, but the yield in both zones were similar in the field trial at Lönnstorp, south Sweden. On the contrary, in the field trial at Säby 1 in Uppsala, central Sweden, crop zone produced less yield than traffic zone probably because of too loose soil, which impaired the uptake of nutrients and water. We conclude that if vehicle weight is not very high and the soil is not vulnerable to compaction, dual wheels and CTF are equal options. |
first_indexed | 2024-03-12T00:28:52Z |
format | Article |
id | doaj.art-14a2570d44a9472da419907fdf092a8d |
institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
issn | 0906-4710 1651-1913 |
language | English |
last_indexed | 2024-03-12T00:28:52Z |
publishDate | 2020-05-01 |
publisher | Taylor & Francis Group |
record_format | Article |
series | Acta Agriculturae Scandinavica. Section B, Soil and Plant Science |
spelling | doaj.art-14a2570d44a9472da419907fdf092a8d2023-09-15T10:26:25ZengTaylor & Francis GroupActa Agriculturae Scandinavica. Section B, Soil and Plant Science0906-47101651-19132020-05-0170433334010.1080/09064710.2020.17283721728372Soil and crop responses to controlled traffic farming in reduced tillage and no-till: some experiences from field experiments and on-farm studies in SwedenArarso Etana0Lena Holm1Tomas Rydberg2Thomas Keller3Swedish University of Agricultural SciencesSwedish University of Agricultural SciencesSwedish University of Agricultural SciencesSwedish University of Agricultural SciencesThe purpose of this study was to investigate the impact of controlled traffic farming (CTF) with respect to soil physical properties and crop yield for Swedish conditions. Three field trials were conducted for six growing seasons in central and southern Sweden. In two of the trials, we compared CTF with random traffic farming (RTF) in deep chiseling (DC, 15–20 cm), shallow cultivation (SC, 5–10 cm) and no-till. The third trial was on farm study by using the existing CTF module at the farm. In the tracks of CTF (traffic zone) dry bulk density was increased and water movement was decreased. Soil penetration resistance was greater in the traffic zone than in the crop zone in some of the trials but the difference was not statistically significant. On average, crop yield was similar between CTF and RTF for all trials. Yield in the traffic zone was significantly less than that in the crop zone in the on-farm trial, but the yield in both zones were similar in the field trial at Lönnstorp, south Sweden. On the contrary, in the field trial at Säby 1 in Uppsala, central Sweden, crop zone produced less yield than traffic zone probably because of too loose soil, which impaired the uptake of nutrients and water. We conclude that if vehicle weight is not very high and the soil is not vulnerable to compaction, dual wheels and CTF are equal options.http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/09064710.2020.1728372deep cultivationdual wheelson-farm trialshallow cultivationsoil compaction |
spellingShingle | Ararso Etana Lena Holm Tomas Rydberg Thomas Keller Soil and crop responses to controlled traffic farming in reduced tillage and no-till: some experiences from field experiments and on-farm studies in Sweden Acta Agriculturae Scandinavica. Section B, Soil and Plant Science deep cultivation dual wheels on-farm trial shallow cultivation soil compaction |
title | Soil and crop responses to controlled traffic farming in reduced tillage and no-till: some experiences from field experiments and on-farm studies in Sweden |
title_full | Soil and crop responses to controlled traffic farming in reduced tillage and no-till: some experiences from field experiments and on-farm studies in Sweden |
title_fullStr | Soil and crop responses to controlled traffic farming in reduced tillage and no-till: some experiences from field experiments and on-farm studies in Sweden |
title_full_unstemmed | Soil and crop responses to controlled traffic farming in reduced tillage and no-till: some experiences from field experiments and on-farm studies in Sweden |
title_short | Soil and crop responses to controlled traffic farming in reduced tillage and no-till: some experiences from field experiments and on-farm studies in Sweden |
title_sort | soil and crop responses to controlled traffic farming in reduced tillage and no till some experiences from field experiments and on farm studies in sweden |
topic | deep cultivation dual wheels on-farm trial shallow cultivation soil compaction |
url | http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/09064710.2020.1728372 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT ararsoetana soilandcropresponsestocontrolledtrafficfarminginreducedtillageandnotillsomeexperiencesfromfieldexperimentsandonfarmstudiesinsweden AT lenaholm soilandcropresponsestocontrolledtrafficfarminginreducedtillageandnotillsomeexperiencesfromfieldexperimentsandonfarmstudiesinsweden AT tomasrydberg soilandcropresponsestocontrolledtrafficfarminginreducedtillageandnotillsomeexperiencesfromfieldexperimentsandonfarmstudiesinsweden AT thomaskeller soilandcropresponsestocontrolledtrafficfarminginreducedtillageandnotillsomeexperiencesfromfieldexperimentsandonfarmstudiesinsweden |