Comparison of different methods of obtaining the rapid shallow breathing index

Objective: To compare the Rapid Shallow Breathing Index (RSBI) obtained by the ventilometer and from mechanical ventilation parameters. Methods: Randomized crossover trial, including 33 intubated patients, on mechanical ventilation for at least 24 hours, undergoing spontaneous breathing test. Patien...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Halina Duarte, Daniele Loss Gambet Fran..a, Maria Clara Fagundes Portes, Ana Paula Ara..jo Faria, Rodrigo Monteiro Fontes, Ver..nica Louren..o Wittmer, Marcela Cangussu Barbalho-Moulim, Fl..via Marini Paro
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Elsevier 2023-09-01
Series:Brazilian Journal of Anesthesiology
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0104001421002025
_version_ 1797679472572366848
author Halina Duarte
Daniele Loss Gambet Fran..a
Maria Clara Fagundes Portes
Ana Paula Ara..jo Faria
Rodrigo Monteiro Fontes
Ver..nica Louren..o Wittmer
Marcela Cangussu Barbalho-Moulim
Fl..via Marini Paro
author_facet Halina Duarte
Daniele Loss Gambet Fran..a
Maria Clara Fagundes Portes
Ana Paula Ara..jo Faria
Rodrigo Monteiro Fontes
Ver..nica Louren..o Wittmer
Marcela Cangussu Barbalho-Moulim
Fl..via Marini Paro
author_sort Halina Duarte
collection DOAJ
description Objective: To compare the Rapid Shallow Breathing Index (RSBI) obtained by the ventilometer and from mechanical ventilation parameters. Methods: Randomized crossover trial, including 33 intubated patients, on mechanical ventilation for at least 24 hours, undergoing spontaneous breathing test. Patients were submitted to the measurement of RSBI by four methods: disconnected from the ventilator through the ventilometer; in Pressure Support Ventilation (PSV) mode at a pressure of 7.ßcm H2O; in Continuous Positive Airway Pressure (CPAP) mode at a pressure of 5.ßcmH2O with flow trigger; in CPAP mode at a pressure of 5.ßcmH2O with pressure trigger. Results: No significant difference was detected between the RSBI obtained by the ventilometer and in the CPAP mode with flow and pressure triggers, however, in the PSV mode, the values were lower than in the other measurements (p.ß<.ß0.001). By selecting patients from the sample with higher RSBI (... 80 cycles.min-1.L-1), the value of the index obtained by the ventilometer was higher than that obtained in the three options of ventilation methods. Conclusion: The RSBI obtained in the CPAP mode at a pressure of 5.ßcmH2O, in both triggers types, did not differ from that measured by the ventilometer; it is, therefore, an alternative when obtaining it from mechanical ventilation parameters is necessary. However, in the presence of borderline values, the RSBI measured by ventilometer is recommended, as in this method the values are significantly higher than in the three ventilation modalities investigated.
first_indexed 2024-03-11T23:15:10Z
format Article
id doaj.art-14a482869f9c4d6a92cd8d92acde99da
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 0104-0014
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-11T23:15:10Z
publishDate 2023-09-01
publisher Elsevier
record_format Article
series Brazilian Journal of Anesthesiology
spelling doaj.art-14a482869f9c4d6a92cd8d92acde99da2023-09-21T04:36:03ZengElsevierBrazilian Journal of Anesthesiology0104-00142023-09-01735578583Comparison of different methods of obtaining the rapid shallow breathing indexHalina Duarte0Daniele Loss Gambet Fran..a1Maria Clara Fagundes Portes2Ana Paula Ara..jo Faria3Rodrigo Monteiro Fontes4Ver..nica Louren..o Wittmer5Marcela Cangussu Barbalho-Moulim6Fl..via Marini Paro7Universidade Federal do Esp.írito Santo (UFES), Vit..ria, ES, Brazil; Corresponding author.Universidade Federal do Esp.írito Santo (UFES), Vit..ria, ES, BrazilUniversidade Federal do Esp.írito Santo (UFES), Vit..ria, ES, BrazilHospital Universit..rio Cassiano Ant..nio de Moraes (HUCAM), Vit..ria, ES, BrazilHospital Universit..rio Cassiano Ant..nio de Moraes (HUCAM), Vit..ria, ES, BrazilUniversidade Federal do Esp.írito Santo (UFES), Vit..ria, ES, BrazilUniversidade Federal do Esp.írito Santo (UFES), Vit..ria, ES, BrazilUniversidade Federal do Esp.írito Santo (UFES), Vit..ria, ES, BrazilObjective: To compare the Rapid Shallow Breathing Index (RSBI) obtained by the ventilometer and from mechanical ventilation parameters. Methods: Randomized crossover trial, including 33 intubated patients, on mechanical ventilation for at least 24 hours, undergoing spontaneous breathing test. Patients were submitted to the measurement of RSBI by four methods: disconnected from the ventilator through the ventilometer; in Pressure Support Ventilation (PSV) mode at a pressure of 7.ßcm H2O; in Continuous Positive Airway Pressure (CPAP) mode at a pressure of 5.ßcmH2O with flow trigger; in CPAP mode at a pressure of 5.ßcmH2O with pressure trigger. Results: No significant difference was detected between the RSBI obtained by the ventilometer and in the CPAP mode with flow and pressure triggers, however, in the PSV mode, the values were lower than in the other measurements (p.ß<.ß0.001). By selecting patients from the sample with higher RSBI (... 80 cycles.min-1.L-1), the value of the index obtained by the ventilometer was higher than that obtained in the three options of ventilation methods. Conclusion: The RSBI obtained in the CPAP mode at a pressure of 5.ßcmH2O, in both triggers types, did not differ from that measured by the ventilometer; it is, therefore, an alternative when obtaining it from mechanical ventilation parameters is necessary. However, in the presence of borderline values, the RSBI measured by ventilometer is recommended, as in this method the values are significantly higher than in the three ventilation modalities investigated.http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0104001421002025Respiration, artificialVentilator weaningAirway extubationContinuous positive airway pressureBreath testsIntensive care units
spellingShingle Halina Duarte
Daniele Loss Gambet Fran..a
Maria Clara Fagundes Portes
Ana Paula Ara..jo Faria
Rodrigo Monteiro Fontes
Ver..nica Louren..o Wittmer
Marcela Cangussu Barbalho-Moulim
Fl..via Marini Paro
Comparison of different methods of obtaining the rapid shallow breathing index
Brazilian Journal of Anesthesiology
Respiration, artificial
Ventilator weaning
Airway extubation
Continuous positive airway pressure
Breath tests
Intensive care units
title Comparison of different methods of obtaining the rapid shallow breathing index
title_full Comparison of different methods of obtaining the rapid shallow breathing index
title_fullStr Comparison of different methods of obtaining the rapid shallow breathing index
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of different methods of obtaining the rapid shallow breathing index
title_short Comparison of different methods of obtaining the rapid shallow breathing index
title_sort comparison of different methods of obtaining the rapid shallow breathing index
topic Respiration, artificial
Ventilator weaning
Airway extubation
Continuous positive airway pressure
Breath tests
Intensive care units
url http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0104001421002025
work_keys_str_mv AT halinaduarte comparisonofdifferentmethodsofobtainingtherapidshallowbreathingindex
AT danielelossgambetfrana comparisonofdifferentmethodsofobtainingtherapidshallowbreathingindex
AT mariaclarafagundesportes comparisonofdifferentmethodsofobtainingtherapidshallowbreathingindex
AT anapaulaarajofaria comparisonofdifferentmethodsofobtainingtherapidshallowbreathingindex
AT rodrigomonteirofontes comparisonofdifferentmethodsofobtainingtherapidshallowbreathingindex
AT vernicalourenowittmer comparisonofdifferentmethodsofobtainingtherapidshallowbreathingindex
AT marcelacangussubarbalhomoulim comparisonofdifferentmethodsofobtainingtherapidshallowbreathingindex
AT flviamariniparo comparisonofdifferentmethodsofobtainingtherapidshallowbreathingindex