Missed and Detected Incidental Breast Cancers on Contrast Enhanced Chest CT: Detection Rates and CT Features
This study investigated the rate at which radiologists miss or detect incidental breast cancers on chest CT and to compare the CT features between the two groups. This retrospective study evaluated chest CT examinations and medical records of patients who registered with the diagnosis code of “breas...
Main Authors: | , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
MDPI AG
2023-04-01
|
Series: | Diagnostics |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://www.mdpi.com/2075-4418/13/9/1522 |
_version_ | 1797602813437542400 |
---|---|
author | Jiyeon Park Chohee Kim Yoon Ki Cha Myung Jin Chung |
author_facet | Jiyeon Park Chohee Kim Yoon Ki Cha Myung Jin Chung |
author_sort | Jiyeon Park |
collection | DOAJ |
description | This study investigated the rate at which radiologists miss or detect incidental breast cancers on chest CT and to compare the CT features between the two groups. This retrospective study evaluated chest CT examinations and medical records of patients who registered with the diagnosis code of “breast cancer” between January 2016 and December 2020, and who had undergone contrast enhanced chest CT 3–18 months before registration, during which they were unaware of any breast lesions. This study found that out of 84 patients, incidental breast cancer lesions were missed in 54 (64.3%) and detected in 30 (53.7%). The initial treatment was delayed in the missed breast lesions group (<i>p</i> = 0.004). Breast lesions of smaller sizes (<9.0 mm, <i>p</i> = 0.01), or with lower enhancement ratios (<1.4, <i>p</i> = 0.009), were more likely to be missed. When three radiologists re-read the CTs with more attention to breast area, they detected breast cancers with higher accuracies (90.1%, 87.9%, and 81.3%). In summary, this study revealed that radiologists miss 64.3% of incidental breast cancers on chest CT, especially those of sub-centimeter sizes and weak enhancements. |
first_indexed | 2024-03-11T04:20:50Z |
format | Article |
id | doaj.art-14aeb05e11e6471fa427652d872ffe30 |
institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
issn | 2075-4418 |
language | English |
last_indexed | 2024-03-11T04:20:50Z |
publishDate | 2023-04-01 |
publisher | MDPI AG |
record_format | Article |
series | Diagnostics |
spelling | doaj.art-14aeb05e11e6471fa427652d872ffe302023-11-17T22:44:49ZengMDPI AGDiagnostics2075-44182023-04-01139152210.3390/diagnostics13091522Missed and Detected Incidental Breast Cancers on Contrast Enhanced Chest CT: Detection Rates and CT FeaturesJiyeon Park0Chohee Kim1Yoon Ki Cha2Myung Jin Chung3Department of Radiology and Center for Imaging Science, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul 06351, Republic of KoreaDepartment of Radiology, Ansan Hospital, Korea University College of Medicine, Seoul 02841, Republic of KoreaDepartment of Radiology and Center for Imaging Science, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul 06351, Republic of KoreaDepartment of Radiology and Center for Imaging Science, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul 06351, Republic of KoreaThis study investigated the rate at which radiologists miss or detect incidental breast cancers on chest CT and to compare the CT features between the two groups. This retrospective study evaluated chest CT examinations and medical records of patients who registered with the diagnosis code of “breast cancer” between January 2016 and December 2020, and who had undergone contrast enhanced chest CT 3–18 months before registration, during which they were unaware of any breast lesions. This study found that out of 84 patients, incidental breast cancer lesions were missed in 54 (64.3%) and detected in 30 (53.7%). The initial treatment was delayed in the missed breast lesions group (<i>p</i> = 0.004). Breast lesions of smaller sizes (<9.0 mm, <i>p</i> = 0.01), or with lower enhancement ratios (<1.4, <i>p</i> = 0.009), were more likely to be missed. When three radiologists re-read the CTs with more attention to breast area, they detected breast cancers with higher accuracies (90.1%, 87.9%, and 81.3%). In summary, this study revealed that radiologists miss 64.3% of incidental breast cancers on chest CT, especially those of sub-centimeter sizes and weak enhancements.https://www.mdpi.com/2075-4418/13/9/1522multidetector computed tomographybreast neoplasmsthorax |
spellingShingle | Jiyeon Park Chohee Kim Yoon Ki Cha Myung Jin Chung Missed and Detected Incidental Breast Cancers on Contrast Enhanced Chest CT: Detection Rates and CT Features Diagnostics multidetector computed tomography breast neoplasms thorax |
title | Missed and Detected Incidental Breast Cancers on Contrast Enhanced Chest CT: Detection Rates and CT Features |
title_full | Missed and Detected Incidental Breast Cancers on Contrast Enhanced Chest CT: Detection Rates and CT Features |
title_fullStr | Missed and Detected Incidental Breast Cancers on Contrast Enhanced Chest CT: Detection Rates and CT Features |
title_full_unstemmed | Missed and Detected Incidental Breast Cancers on Contrast Enhanced Chest CT: Detection Rates and CT Features |
title_short | Missed and Detected Incidental Breast Cancers on Contrast Enhanced Chest CT: Detection Rates and CT Features |
title_sort | missed and detected incidental breast cancers on contrast enhanced chest ct detection rates and ct features |
topic | multidetector computed tomography breast neoplasms thorax |
url | https://www.mdpi.com/2075-4418/13/9/1522 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT jiyeonpark missedanddetectedincidentalbreastcancersoncontrastenhancedchestctdetectionratesandctfeatures AT choheekim missedanddetectedincidentalbreastcancersoncontrastenhancedchestctdetectionratesandctfeatures AT yoonkicha missedanddetectedincidentalbreastcancersoncontrastenhancedchestctdetectionratesandctfeatures AT myungjinchung missedanddetectedincidentalbreastcancersoncontrastenhancedchestctdetectionratesandctfeatures |