An in vivo double-blind randomized controlled study comparing the postoperative pain in single sitting root canal treatment under bupivacaine versus lignocaine used as a local anesthetic agent

Aim: This in vivo double-blind randomized control trial was carried out to evaluate the efficacy of a long-acting local anesthetic bupivacaine in preventing postoperative pain associated with single sitting endodontic treatment and to compare it with lignocaine when used as a local anesthetic agent....

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Sumita A Bhagwat, Anacleta Heredia, Leena V Padhye
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications 2019-01-01
Series:Endodontology
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.endodontologyonweb.org/article.asp?issn=0970-7212;year=2019;volume=31;issue=1;spage=2;epage=8;aulast=Bhagwat
_version_ 1819136677631754240
author Sumita A Bhagwat
Anacleta Heredia
Leena V Padhye
author_facet Sumita A Bhagwat
Anacleta Heredia
Leena V Padhye
author_sort Sumita A Bhagwat
collection DOAJ
description Aim: This in vivo double-blind randomized control trial was carried out to evaluate the efficacy of a long-acting local anesthetic bupivacaine in preventing postoperative pain associated with single sitting endodontic treatment and to compare it with lignocaine when used as a local anesthetic agent. Methods: A total of fifty patients with symptomatic irreversible pulpitis were selected to be included in the study. The patients were randomly divided into two groups: Group A patients were given lignocaine as local anesthetic and Group B were given bupivacaine. The root canal procedures for the patients were carried out in single sittings under rubber dam using hand ProTaper™ system, 2.5% sodium hypochlorite as irrigant alternating with normal saline and obturation by lateral condensation technique. A questionnaire employing visual analog scale for pain assessment was given to the patient and instructions on how to fill the form were given. The patients were recalled after 2 days, and the pain was analyzed. The result was tabulated and statistically analyzed for incidence and degree of pain. Results: The mean overall postoperative pain for bupivacaine was lesser than that for lignocaine, and the difference was statistically significant. Conclusion: Based on our findings and in comparison with those of other studies, we reached the conclusion that it may be recommended that bupivacaine may replace lignocaine as the anesthetic of choice in the single visit endodontic protocol in order to reduce the incidence of postoperative pain often seen after single visit endodontic procedures.
first_indexed 2024-12-22T10:38:47Z
format Article
id doaj.art-14b91b19aac24df6849d9833b6c720a1
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 0970-7212
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-22T10:38:47Z
publishDate 2019-01-01
publisher Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications
record_format Article
series Endodontology
spelling doaj.art-14b91b19aac24df6849d9833b6c720a12022-12-21T18:29:05ZengWolters Kluwer Medknow PublicationsEndodontology0970-72122019-01-013112810.4103/endo.endo_1_18An in vivo double-blind randomized controlled study comparing the postoperative pain in single sitting root canal treatment under bupivacaine versus lignocaine used as a local anesthetic agentSumita A BhagwatAnacleta HerediaLeena V PadhyeAim: This in vivo double-blind randomized control trial was carried out to evaluate the efficacy of a long-acting local anesthetic bupivacaine in preventing postoperative pain associated with single sitting endodontic treatment and to compare it with lignocaine when used as a local anesthetic agent. Methods: A total of fifty patients with symptomatic irreversible pulpitis were selected to be included in the study. The patients were randomly divided into two groups: Group A patients were given lignocaine as local anesthetic and Group B were given bupivacaine. The root canal procedures for the patients were carried out in single sittings under rubber dam using hand ProTaper™ system, 2.5% sodium hypochlorite as irrigant alternating with normal saline and obturation by lateral condensation technique. A questionnaire employing visual analog scale for pain assessment was given to the patient and instructions on how to fill the form were given. The patients were recalled after 2 days, and the pain was analyzed. The result was tabulated and statistically analyzed for incidence and degree of pain. Results: The mean overall postoperative pain for bupivacaine was lesser than that for lignocaine, and the difference was statistically significant. Conclusion: Based on our findings and in comparison with those of other studies, we reached the conclusion that it may be recommended that bupivacaine may replace lignocaine as the anesthetic of choice in the single visit endodontic protocol in order to reduce the incidence of postoperative pain often seen after single visit endodontic procedures.http://www.endodontologyonweb.org/article.asp?issn=0970-7212;year=2019;volume=31;issue=1;spage=2;epage=8;aulast=BhagwatBupivacainelignocainepostoperative painsingle sitting root canal treatment
spellingShingle Sumita A Bhagwat
Anacleta Heredia
Leena V Padhye
An in vivo double-blind randomized controlled study comparing the postoperative pain in single sitting root canal treatment under bupivacaine versus lignocaine used as a local anesthetic agent
Endodontology
Bupivacaine
lignocaine
postoperative pain
single sitting root canal treatment
title An in vivo double-blind randomized controlled study comparing the postoperative pain in single sitting root canal treatment under bupivacaine versus lignocaine used as a local anesthetic agent
title_full An in vivo double-blind randomized controlled study comparing the postoperative pain in single sitting root canal treatment under bupivacaine versus lignocaine used as a local anesthetic agent
title_fullStr An in vivo double-blind randomized controlled study comparing the postoperative pain in single sitting root canal treatment under bupivacaine versus lignocaine used as a local anesthetic agent
title_full_unstemmed An in vivo double-blind randomized controlled study comparing the postoperative pain in single sitting root canal treatment under bupivacaine versus lignocaine used as a local anesthetic agent
title_short An in vivo double-blind randomized controlled study comparing the postoperative pain in single sitting root canal treatment under bupivacaine versus lignocaine used as a local anesthetic agent
title_sort in vivo double blind randomized controlled study comparing the postoperative pain in single sitting root canal treatment under bupivacaine versus lignocaine used as a local anesthetic agent
topic Bupivacaine
lignocaine
postoperative pain
single sitting root canal treatment
url http://www.endodontologyonweb.org/article.asp?issn=0970-7212;year=2019;volume=31;issue=1;spage=2;epage=8;aulast=Bhagwat
work_keys_str_mv AT sumitaabhagwat aninvivodoubleblindrandomizedcontrolledstudycomparingthepostoperativepaininsinglesittingrootcanaltreatmentunderbupivacaineversuslignocaineusedasalocalanestheticagent
AT anacletaheredia aninvivodoubleblindrandomizedcontrolledstudycomparingthepostoperativepaininsinglesittingrootcanaltreatmentunderbupivacaineversuslignocaineusedasalocalanestheticagent
AT leenavpadhye aninvivodoubleblindrandomizedcontrolledstudycomparingthepostoperativepaininsinglesittingrootcanaltreatmentunderbupivacaineversuslignocaineusedasalocalanestheticagent
AT sumitaabhagwat invivodoubleblindrandomizedcontrolledstudycomparingthepostoperativepaininsinglesittingrootcanaltreatmentunderbupivacaineversuslignocaineusedasalocalanestheticagent
AT anacletaheredia invivodoubleblindrandomizedcontrolledstudycomparingthepostoperativepaininsinglesittingrootcanaltreatmentunderbupivacaineversuslignocaineusedasalocalanestheticagent
AT leenavpadhye invivodoubleblindrandomizedcontrolledstudycomparingthepostoperativepaininsinglesittingrootcanaltreatmentunderbupivacaineversuslignocaineusedasalocalanestheticagent