Head and Neck Ultrasound Utilization Rates: 2012 to 2019

Abstract Objective We measured utilization of clinician‐performed head and neck ultrasound among otolaryngologists, endocrinologists, and general surgeons, using Medicare Provider Utilization and Payment Data. Study Design Retrospective analysis of Medicare billing database. Setting University. Meth...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Courtney B. Shires, John D. Boughter Jr., Aaron Smith, Merry E Sebelik
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wiley 2023-10-01
Series:OTO Open
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1002/oto2.97
Description
Summary:Abstract Objective We measured utilization of clinician‐performed head and neck ultrasound among otolaryngologists, endocrinologists, and general surgeons, using Medicare Provider Utilization and Payment Data. Study Design Retrospective analysis of Medicare billing database. Setting University. Methods For each year, the files were filtered to include 4 provider types: Diagnostic Radiology (DR), Endocrinology (ENDO), General Surgery (GS), and Otolaryngology (OTO). Billable procedures are listed by Healthcare Common Procedure Coding System code and a filter was applied to include 76536 Ultrasound, soft tissues of the head and neck. Results In 2019, OTOs submitted charges for 2.1% of all head and neck diagnostic ultrasounds (76536) performed on Medicare beneficiaries. For each year 2012 to 2019, DRs submitted the most charges, followed by ENDOs, and then OTO and GS. Charges for all groups increased in a proportional manner across the 8‐year period. 14.5% of OTOs submitted more than 100 charges apiece during 2019, that is, “super users.” The percentage of super users within each specialty increased from 2012 to 2019. Overall, the data support an ever‐increasing use of head and neck ultrasound (HNUS) among all provider types. Conclusion Even with increased use among OTOs, this specialty only accounted for a small percentage of head & neck diagnostic ultrasounds performed on Medicare beneficiaries in 2019. Changes in volume of nonradiology point‐of‐care HNUS was not associated with changes in DR volume. A greater proportion of OTOs than DRs are “super users” among the ultrasound users within their specialty, performing more than 100 exams/year. Level of Evidence V.
ISSN:2473-974X