Quality of active case-finding for tuberculosis in India: a national level secondary data analysis

Background India has been implementing active case-finding (ACF) for TB among marginalised and vulnerable (high-risk) populations since 2017. The effectiveness of ACF cycle(s) is dependent on the use of appropriate screening and diagnostic tools and meeting quality indicators. Objectives To determin...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Hemant Deepak Shewade, G. Kiruthika, Prabhadevi Ravichandran, Swati Iyer, Aniket Chowdhury, S. Kiran Pradeep, Kathiresan Jeyashree, S. Devika, Joshua Chadwick, Jeromie Wesley Vivian, Dheeraj Tumu, Amar N. Shah, Bhavin Vadera, Venkatesh Roddawar, Sanjay K. Mattoo, Kiran Rade, Raghuram Rao, Manoj V. Murhekar
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Taylor & Francis Group 2023-12-01
Series:Global Health Action
Subjects:
Online Access:http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/16549716.2023.2256129
_version_ 1797351872395214848
author Hemant Deepak Shewade
G. Kiruthika
Prabhadevi Ravichandran
Swati Iyer
Aniket Chowdhury
S. Kiran Pradeep
Kathiresan Jeyashree
S. Devika
Joshua Chadwick
Jeromie Wesley Vivian
Dheeraj Tumu
Amar N. Shah
Bhavin Vadera
Venkatesh Roddawar
Sanjay K. Mattoo
Kiran Rade
Raghuram Rao
Manoj V. Murhekar
author_facet Hemant Deepak Shewade
G. Kiruthika
Prabhadevi Ravichandran
Swati Iyer
Aniket Chowdhury
S. Kiran Pradeep
Kathiresan Jeyashree
S. Devika
Joshua Chadwick
Jeromie Wesley Vivian
Dheeraj Tumu
Amar N. Shah
Bhavin Vadera
Venkatesh Roddawar
Sanjay K. Mattoo
Kiran Rade
Raghuram Rao
Manoj V. Murhekar
author_sort Hemant Deepak Shewade
collection DOAJ
description Background India has been implementing active case-finding (ACF) for TB among marginalised and vulnerable (high-risk) populations since 2017. The effectiveness of ACF cycle(s) is dependent on the use of appropriate screening and diagnostic tools and meeting quality indicators. Objectives To determine the number of ACF cycles implemented in 2021 at national, state (n = 36) and district (n = 768) level and quality indicators for the first ACF cycle. Methods In this descriptive study, aggregate TB program data for each ACF activity that was extracted was further aggregated against each ACF cycle at the district level in 2021. One ACF cycle was the period identified to cover all the high-risk populations in the district. Three TB ACF quality indicators were calculated: percentage population screened (≥10%), percentage tested among screened (≥4.8%) and percentage diagnosed among tested (≥5%). We also calculated the number needed to screen (NNS) for diagnosing one person with TB (≤1538). Results Of 768 TB districts, ACF data for 111 were not available. Of the remaining 657 districts, 642 (98%) implemented one, and 15 implemented two to three ACF cycles. None of the districts or states met all three TB ACF quality indicators’ cut-offs. At the national level, for the first ACF cycle, 9.3% of the population were screened, 1% of the screened were tested and 3.7% of the tested were diagnosed. The NNS was 2824: acceptable (≤1538) in institutional facilities and poor for population-based groups. Data were not consistently available to calculate the percentage of i) high-risk population covered, ii) presumptive TB among screened and iii) tested among presumptive. Conclusion In 2021, India implemented one ACF cycle with sub-optimal ACF quality indicators. Reducing the losses between screening and testing, improving data quality and sensitising stakeholders regarding the importance of meeting all ACF quality indicators are recommended.
first_indexed 2024-03-08T13:06:54Z
format Article
id doaj.art-14c9196225454fc190397f83f5bf729f
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1654-9880
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-08T13:06:54Z
publishDate 2023-12-01
publisher Taylor & Francis Group
record_format Article
series Global Health Action
spelling doaj.art-14c9196225454fc190397f83f5bf729f2024-01-18T15:58:24ZengTaylor & Francis GroupGlobal Health Action1654-98802023-12-0116110.1080/16549716.2023.22561292256129Quality of active case-finding for tuberculosis in India: a national level secondary data analysisHemant Deepak Shewade0G. Kiruthika1Prabhadevi Ravichandran2Swati Iyer3Aniket Chowdhury4S. Kiran Pradeep5Kathiresan Jeyashree6S. Devika7Joshua Chadwick8Jeromie Wesley Vivian9Dheeraj Tumu10Amar N. Shah11Bhavin Vadera12Venkatesh Roddawar13Sanjay K. Mattoo14Kiran Rade15Raghuram Rao16Manoj V. Murhekar17Division of Health Systems Research, ICMR-National Institute of Epidemiology (ICMR-NIE)Division of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, ICMR-National Institute of Epidemiology (ICMR-NIE)Division of Health Systems Research, ICMR-National Institute of Epidemiology (ICMR-NIE)Tuberculosis, Office of the World Health Organization (WHO) Representative to IndiaTuberculosis, Office of the World Health Organization (WHO) Representative to IndiaDivision of Health Systems Research, ICMR-National Institute of Epidemiology (ICMR-NIE)Division of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, ICMR-National Institute of Epidemiology (ICMR-NIE)Division of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, ICMR-National Institute of Epidemiology (ICMR-NIE)School of Public Health, ICMR-National Institute of Epidemiology (ICMR-NIE)Division of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, ICMR-National Institute of Epidemiology (ICMR-NIE)Tuberculosis, Office of the World Health Organization (WHO) Representative to IndiaHealth Office, USAID IndiaHealth Office, USAID IndiaTIFA project, John Snow India Private LtdCentral TB Division, Ministry of Health and Family WelfareTuberculosis, Office of the World Health Organization (WHO) Representative to IndiaCentral TB Division, Ministry of Health and Family WelfareDivision of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, ICMR-National Institute of Epidemiology (ICMR-NIE)Background India has been implementing active case-finding (ACF) for TB among marginalised and vulnerable (high-risk) populations since 2017. The effectiveness of ACF cycle(s) is dependent on the use of appropriate screening and diagnostic tools and meeting quality indicators. Objectives To determine the number of ACF cycles implemented in 2021 at national, state (n = 36) and district (n = 768) level and quality indicators for the first ACF cycle. Methods In this descriptive study, aggregate TB program data for each ACF activity that was extracted was further aggregated against each ACF cycle at the district level in 2021. One ACF cycle was the period identified to cover all the high-risk populations in the district. Three TB ACF quality indicators were calculated: percentage population screened (≥10%), percentage tested among screened (≥4.8%) and percentage diagnosed among tested (≥5%). We also calculated the number needed to screen (NNS) for diagnosing one person with TB (≤1538). Results Of 768 TB districts, ACF data for 111 were not available. Of the remaining 657 districts, 642 (98%) implemented one, and 15 implemented two to three ACF cycles. None of the districts or states met all three TB ACF quality indicators’ cut-offs. At the national level, for the first ACF cycle, 9.3% of the population were screened, 1% of the screened were tested and 3.7% of the tested were diagnosed. The NNS was 2824: acceptable (≤1538) in institutional facilities and poor for population-based groups. Data were not consistently available to calculate the percentage of i) high-risk population covered, ii) presumptive TB among screened and iii) tested among presumptive. Conclusion In 2021, India implemented one ACF cycle with sub-optimal ACF quality indicators. Reducing the losses between screening and testing, improving data quality and sensitising stakeholders regarding the importance of meeting all ACF quality indicators are recommended.http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/16549716.2023.2256129operational researchtb acf cyclenumber needed to screentb acf quality indicatorshigh-risk groupsindia
spellingShingle Hemant Deepak Shewade
G. Kiruthika
Prabhadevi Ravichandran
Swati Iyer
Aniket Chowdhury
S. Kiran Pradeep
Kathiresan Jeyashree
S. Devika
Joshua Chadwick
Jeromie Wesley Vivian
Dheeraj Tumu
Amar N. Shah
Bhavin Vadera
Venkatesh Roddawar
Sanjay K. Mattoo
Kiran Rade
Raghuram Rao
Manoj V. Murhekar
Quality of active case-finding for tuberculosis in India: a national level secondary data analysis
Global Health Action
operational research
tb acf cycle
number needed to screen
tb acf quality indicators
high-risk groups
india
title Quality of active case-finding for tuberculosis in India: a national level secondary data analysis
title_full Quality of active case-finding for tuberculosis in India: a national level secondary data analysis
title_fullStr Quality of active case-finding for tuberculosis in India: a national level secondary data analysis
title_full_unstemmed Quality of active case-finding for tuberculosis in India: a national level secondary data analysis
title_short Quality of active case-finding for tuberculosis in India: a national level secondary data analysis
title_sort quality of active case finding for tuberculosis in india a national level secondary data analysis
topic operational research
tb acf cycle
number needed to screen
tb acf quality indicators
high-risk groups
india
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/16549716.2023.2256129
work_keys_str_mv AT hemantdeepakshewade qualityofactivecasefindingfortuberculosisinindiaanationallevelsecondarydataanalysis
AT gkiruthika qualityofactivecasefindingfortuberculosisinindiaanationallevelsecondarydataanalysis
AT prabhadeviravichandran qualityofactivecasefindingfortuberculosisinindiaanationallevelsecondarydataanalysis
AT swatiiyer qualityofactivecasefindingfortuberculosisinindiaanationallevelsecondarydataanalysis
AT aniketchowdhury qualityofactivecasefindingfortuberculosisinindiaanationallevelsecondarydataanalysis
AT skiranpradeep qualityofactivecasefindingfortuberculosisinindiaanationallevelsecondarydataanalysis
AT kathiresanjeyashree qualityofactivecasefindingfortuberculosisinindiaanationallevelsecondarydataanalysis
AT sdevika qualityofactivecasefindingfortuberculosisinindiaanationallevelsecondarydataanalysis
AT joshuachadwick qualityofactivecasefindingfortuberculosisinindiaanationallevelsecondarydataanalysis
AT jeromiewesleyvivian qualityofactivecasefindingfortuberculosisinindiaanationallevelsecondarydataanalysis
AT dheerajtumu qualityofactivecasefindingfortuberculosisinindiaanationallevelsecondarydataanalysis
AT amarnshah qualityofactivecasefindingfortuberculosisinindiaanationallevelsecondarydataanalysis
AT bhavinvadera qualityofactivecasefindingfortuberculosisinindiaanationallevelsecondarydataanalysis
AT venkateshroddawar qualityofactivecasefindingfortuberculosisinindiaanationallevelsecondarydataanalysis
AT sanjaykmattoo qualityofactivecasefindingfortuberculosisinindiaanationallevelsecondarydataanalysis
AT kiranrade qualityofactivecasefindingfortuberculosisinindiaanationallevelsecondarydataanalysis
AT raghuramrao qualityofactivecasefindingfortuberculosisinindiaanationallevelsecondarydataanalysis
AT manojvmurhekar qualityofactivecasefindingfortuberculosisinindiaanationallevelsecondarydataanalysis