"Definite the task" in examining the theory of the right of obedience

When there is doubt in the obligation and there is no reason, it is the time to implement the practical principle. What is the verdict of basic rule in case of doubt in the obligation? There is disagreement among uṣūliyūn (legal theorists). The famous uṣūliyūn (legal theorists) believe in the implem...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Mohammad hosein Roohi yazdi, Mohammadreza Ayati, Aliasghar Arabian
Format: Article
Language:fas
Published: Semnan University 2023-01-01
Series:مطالعات فقه و حقوق اسلامی
Subjects:
Online Access:https://feqh.semnan.ac.ir/article_7356_9fc4359c726156702ce04f5afaf6d999.pdf
_version_ 1797296319364071424
author Mohammad hosein Roohi yazdi
Mohammadreza Ayati
Aliasghar Arabian
author_facet Mohammad hosein Roohi yazdi
Mohammadreza Ayati
Aliasghar Arabian
author_sort Mohammad hosein Roohi yazdi
collection DOAJ
description When there is doubt in the obligation and there is no reason, it is the time to implement the practical principle. What is the verdict of basic rule in case of doubt in the obligation? There is disagreement among uṣūliyūn (legal theorists). The famous uṣūliyūn (legal theorists) believe in the implementation of the innocence by virtue of reason and by citation of the rule of obscenity for unstated punishment. Contrary to the popular opinion some people, by rejecting the popular view, considered the rule of reason as a necessity of caution. Martyr Sadr (RA) called this theory the right of obedience and he believes that as long as the release is not from the legislator, whoever opposes the suspicious duty, deserves the punishment.From these two professions, we have accepted the theory of obedience. But in accepting this theory, we have a nominal understanding and a fundamental disagreement with Martyr Sadr. Because Martyr Sadr considered the issue of the right of obedience as an obligatory task, but we considered the issue of the right of obedience as a duty in the real world according to the practical rational rule. While reviewing criticizing and rejecting the two mentional professions, we have explained and presented arguments and defended our point of view and we have named it finalized of duty or new method. I invite you to read this article to get more accustomed with the new method.
first_indexed 2024-03-07T22:02:54Z
format Article
id doaj.art-14d3826d2a4f4c73be4c1a0d849031f8
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2008-7012
2717-0330
language fas
last_indexed 2024-03-07T22:02:54Z
publishDate 2023-01-01
publisher Semnan University
record_format Article
series مطالعات فقه و حقوق اسلامی
spelling doaj.art-14d3826d2a4f4c73be4c1a0d849031f82024-02-23T23:28:02ZfasSemnan Universityمطالعات فقه و حقوق اسلامی2008-70122717-03302023-01-01142973610.22075/feqh.2021.24763.30507356"Definite the task" in examining the theory of the right of obedienceMohammad hosein Roohi yazdi0Mohammadreza Ayati1Aliasghar Arabian2PhD student of Science and Research Unit, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran.Associate Professor of Science and Research Unit, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran.دانشیار گروه حقوق، الهیات و علوم سیاسی، واحد علوم و تحقیقات تهران، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی، تهران، ایرانWhen there is doubt in the obligation and there is no reason, it is the time to implement the practical principle. What is the verdict of basic rule in case of doubt in the obligation? There is disagreement among uṣūliyūn (legal theorists). The famous uṣūliyūn (legal theorists) believe in the implementation of the innocence by virtue of reason and by citation of the rule of obscenity for unstated punishment. Contrary to the popular opinion some people, by rejecting the popular view, considered the rule of reason as a necessity of caution. Martyr Sadr (RA) called this theory the right of obedience and he believes that as long as the release is not from the legislator, whoever opposes the suspicious duty, deserves the punishment.From these two professions, we have accepted the theory of obedience. But in accepting this theory, we have a nominal understanding and a fundamental disagreement with Martyr Sadr. Because Martyr Sadr considered the issue of the right of obedience as an obligatory task, but we considered the issue of the right of obedience as a duty in the real world according to the practical rational rule. While reviewing criticizing and rejecting the two mentional professions, we have explained and presented arguments and defended our point of view and we have named it finalized of duty or new method. I invite you to read this article to get more accustomed with the new method.https://feqh.semnan.ac.ir/article_7356_9fc4359c726156702ce04f5afaf6d999.pdfpractical principleinnocenceprecautionobscenity for unstated punishmentright of obediencefulfillment of duty
spellingShingle Mohammad hosein Roohi yazdi
Mohammadreza Ayati
Aliasghar Arabian
"Definite the task" in examining the theory of the right of obedience
مطالعات فقه و حقوق اسلامی
practical principle
innocence
precaution
obscenity for unstated punishment
right of obedience
fulfillment of duty
title "Definite the task" in examining the theory of the right of obedience
title_full "Definite the task" in examining the theory of the right of obedience
title_fullStr "Definite the task" in examining the theory of the right of obedience
title_full_unstemmed "Definite the task" in examining the theory of the right of obedience
title_short "Definite the task" in examining the theory of the right of obedience
title_sort definite the task in examining the theory of the right of obedience
topic practical principle
innocence
precaution
obscenity for unstated punishment
right of obedience
fulfillment of duty
url https://feqh.semnan.ac.ir/article_7356_9fc4359c726156702ce04f5afaf6d999.pdf
work_keys_str_mv AT mohammadhoseinroohiyazdi definitethetaskinexaminingthetheoryoftherightofobedience
AT mohammadrezaayati definitethetaskinexaminingthetheoryoftherightofobedience
AT aliasghararabian definitethetaskinexaminingthetheoryoftherightofobedience