Systematic Review and Comparative Meta-Analysis of Outcomes Following Pedicled Muscle versus Fasciocutaneous Flap Coverage for Complex Periprosthetic Wounds in Patients with Total Knee Arthroplasty

Background In cases of total knee arthroplasty (TKA) threatened by potential hardware exposure, flap-based reconstruction is indicated to provide durable coverage. Historically, muscle flaps were favored as they provide vascular tissue to an infected wound bed. However, data comparing the performan...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: James M. Economides, Michael V. DeFazio, Kayvon Golshani, Mark Cinque, Ersilia L. Anghel, Christopher E. Attinger, Karen Kim Evans
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Thieme Medical Publishers, Inc. 2017-03-01
Series:Archives of Plastic Surgery
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.thieme-connect.de/DOI/DOI?10.5999/aps.2017.44.2.124
_version_ 1811184434724995072
author James M. Economides
Michael V. DeFazio
Kayvon Golshani
Mark Cinque
Ersilia L. Anghel
Christopher E. Attinger
Karen Kim Evans
author_facet James M. Economides
Michael V. DeFazio
Kayvon Golshani
Mark Cinque
Ersilia L. Anghel
Christopher E. Attinger
Karen Kim Evans
author_sort James M. Economides
collection DOAJ
description Background In cases of total knee arthroplasty (TKA) threatened by potential hardware exposure, flap-based reconstruction is indicated to provide durable coverage. Historically, muscle flaps were favored as they provide vascular tissue to an infected wound bed. However, data comparing the performance of muscle versus fasciocutaneous flaps are limited and reflect a lack of consensus regarding the optimal management of these wounds. The aim of this study was to compare the outcomes of muscle versus fasciocutaneous flaps following the salvage of compromised TKA. Methods A systematic search and meta-analysis were performed to identify patients with TKA who underwent either pedicled muscle or fasciocutaneous flap coverage of periprosthetic knee defects. Studies evaluating implant/limb salvage rates, ambulatory function, complications, and donor-site morbidity were included in the comparative analysis. Results A total of 18 articles, corresponding to 172 flaps (119 muscle flaps and 53 fasciocutaneous flaps) were reviewed. Rates of implant salvage (88.8% vs. 90.1%, P=0.05) and limb salvage (89.8% vs. 100%, P=0.14) were comparable in each cohort. While overall complication rates were similar (47.3% vs. 44%, P=0.78), the rates of persistent infection (16.4% vs. 0%, P=0.14) and recurrent infection (9.1% vs. 4%, P=0.94) tended to be higher in the muscle flap cohort. Notably, functional outcomes and ambulation rates were sparingly reported. Conclusions Rates of limb and prosthetic salvage were comparable following muscle or fasciocutaneous flap coverage of compromised TKA. The functional morbidity associated with muscle flap harvest, however, may support the use of fasciocutaneous flaps for coverage of these defects, particularly in young patients and/or high-performance athletes.
first_indexed 2024-04-11T13:12:15Z
format Article
id doaj.art-14e62ce2b5c54907b6cc252f6a162e24
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2234-6163
2234-6171
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-11T13:12:15Z
publishDate 2017-03-01
publisher Thieme Medical Publishers, Inc.
record_format Article
series Archives of Plastic Surgery
spelling doaj.art-14e62ce2b5c54907b6cc252f6a162e242022-12-22T04:22:32ZengThieme Medical Publishers, Inc.Archives of Plastic Surgery2234-61632234-61712017-03-01440212413510.5999/aps.2017.44.2.124773Systematic Review and Comparative Meta-Analysis of Outcomes Following Pedicled Muscle versus Fasciocutaneous Flap Coverage for Complex Periprosthetic Wounds in Patients with Total Knee ArthroplastyJames M. Economides0Michael V. DeFazio1Kayvon Golshani2Mark Cinque3Ersilia L. Anghel4Christopher E. Attinger5Karen Kim Evans6Department of Plastic Surgery, Georgetown University Hospital, Washington, DC, USADepartment of Plastic Surgery, Georgetown University Hospital, Washington, DC, USADepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Georgetown University Hospital, Washington, DC, USADepartment of Plastic Surgery, Georgetown University Hospital, Washington, DC, USADepartment of Plastic Surgery, Georgetown University Hospital, Washington, DC, USADepartment of Plastic Surgery, Georgetown University Hospital, Washington, DC, USADepartment of Plastic Surgery, Georgetown University Hospital, Washington, DC, USABackground In cases of total knee arthroplasty (TKA) threatened by potential hardware exposure, flap-based reconstruction is indicated to provide durable coverage. Historically, muscle flaps were favored as they provide vascular tissue to an infected wound bed. However, data comparing the performance of muscle versus fasciocutaneous flaps are limited and reflect a lack of consensus regarding the optimal management of these wounds. The aim of this study was to compare the outcomes of muscle versus fasciocutaneous flaps following the salvage of compromised TKA. Methods A systematic search and meta-analysis were performed to identify patients with TKA who underwent either pedicled muscle or fasciocutaneous flap coverage of periprosthetic knee defects. Studies evaluating implant/limb salvage rates, ambulatory function, complications, and donor-site morbidity were included in the comparative analysis. Results A total of 18 articles, corresponding to 172 flaps (119 muscle flaps and 53 fasciocutaneous flaps) were reviewed. Rates of implant salvage (88.8% vs. 90.1%, P=0.05) and limb salvage (89.8% vs. 100%, P=0.14) were comparable in each cohort. While overall complication rates were similar (47.3% vs. 44%, P=0.78), the rates of persistent infection (16.4% vs. 0%, P=0.14) and recurrent infection (9.1% vs. 4%, P=0.94) tended to be higher in the muscle flap cohort. Notably, functional outcomes and ambulation rates were sparingly reported. Conclusions Rates of limb and prosthetic salvage were comparable following muscle or fasciocutaneous flap coverage of compromised TKA. The functional morbidity associated with muscle flap harvest, however, may support the use of fasciocutaneous flaps for coverage of these defects, particularly in young patients and/or high-performance athletes.http://www.thieme-connect.de/DOI/DOI?10.5999/aps.2017.44.2.124arthroplasty, replacement, kneeknee prosthesissurgical flaps
spellingShingle James M. Economides
Michael V. DeFazio
Kayvon Golshani
Mark Cinque
Ersilia L. Anghel
Christopher E. Attinger
Karen Kim Evans
Systematic Review and Comparative Meta-Analysis of Outcomes Following Pedicled Muscle versus Fasciocutaneous Flap Coverage for Complex Periprosthetic Wounds in Patients with Total Knee Arthroplasty
Archives of Plastic Surgery
arthroplasty, replacement, knee
knee prosthesis
surgical flaps
title Systematic Review and Comparative Meta-Analysis of Outcomes Following Pedicled Muscle versus Fasciocutaneous Flap Coverage for Complex Periprosthetic Wounds in Patients with Total Knee Arthroplasty
title_full Systematic Review and Comparative Meta-Analysis of Outcomes Following Pedicled Muscle versus Fasciocutaneous Flap Coverage for Complex Periprosthetic Wounds in Patients with Total Knee Arthroplasty
title_fullStr Systematic Review and Comparative Meta-Analysis of Outcomes Following Pedicled Muscle versus Fasciocutaneous Flap Coverage for Complex Periprosthetic Wounds in Patients with Total Knee Arthroplasty
title_full_unstemmed Systematic Review and Comparative Meta-Analysis of Outcomes Following Pedicled Muscle versus Fasciocutaneous Flap Coverage for Complex Periprosthetic Wounds in Patients with Total Knee Arthroplasty
title_short Systematic Review and Comparative Meta-Analysis of Outcomes Following Pedicled Muscle versus Fasciocutaneous Flap Coverage for Complex Periprosthetic Wounds in Patients with Total Knee Arthroplasty
title_sort systematic review and comparative meta analysis of outcomes following pedicled muscle versus fasciocutaneous flap coverage for complex periprosthetic wounds in patients with total knee arthroplasty
topic arthroplasty, replacement, knee
knee prosthesis
surgical flaps
url http://www.thieme-connect.de/DOI/DOI?10.5999/aps.2017.44.2.124
work_keys_str_mv AT jamesmeconomides systematicreviewandcomparativemetaanalysisofoutcomesfollowingpedicledmuscleversusfasciocutaneousflapcoverageforcomplexperiprostheticwoundsinpatientswithtotalkneearthroplasty
AT michaelvdefazio systematicreviewandcomparativemetaanalysisofoutcomesfollowingpedicledmuscleversusfasciocutaneousflapcoverageforcomplexperiprostheticwoundsinpatientswithtotalkneearthroplasty
AT kayvongolshani systematicreviewandcomparativemetaanalysisofoutcomesfollowingpedicledmuscleversusfasciocutaneousflapcoverageforcomplexperiprostheticwoundsinpatientswithtotalkneearthroplasty
AT markcinque systematicreviewandcomparativemetaanalysisofoutcomesfollowingpedicledmuscleversusfasciocutaneousflapcoverageforcomplexperiprostheticwoundsinpatientswithtotalkneearthroplasty
AT ersilialanghel systematicreviewandcomparativemetaanalysisofoutcomesfollowingpedicledmuscleversusfasciocutaneousflapcoverageforcomplexperiprostheticwoundsinpatientswithtotalkneearthroplasty
AT christophereattinger systematicreviewandcomparativemetaanalysisofoutcomesfollowingpedicledmuscleversusfasciocutaneousflapcoverageforcomplexperiprostheticwoundsinpatientswithtotalkneearthroplasty
AT karenkimevans systematicreviewandcomparativemetaanalysisofoutcomesfollowingpedicledmuscleversusfasciocutaneousflapcoverageforcomplexperiprostheticwoundsinpatientswithtotalkneearthroplasty