THE INVESTIGATION OF PRODUCTIVE AND RECEPTIVE COMPETENCE IN V+N AND ADJ+N COLLOCATIONS AMONG INDONESIAN EFL LEARNERS

The important role of collocation in learners’ language proficiency has been acknowledged widely. In Systemic Functional Linguistics (SFL), collocation is known as one prominent member of the super-ordinate lexical cohesion, which contributes significantly to the textual coherence, together with gra...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Saudin Saudin, Iis Sulyaningsih, Lina Meilinda
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia 2017-05-01
Series:Indonesian Journal of Applied Linguistics
Subjects:
Online Access:http://ejournal.upi.edu/index.php/IJAL/article/view/6874
_version_ 1819091236457283584
author Saudin Saudin
Iis Sulyaningsih
Lina Meilinda
author_facet Saudin Saudin
Iis Sulyaningsih
Lina Meilinda
author_sort Saudin Saudin
collection DOAJ
description The important role of collocation in learners’ language proficiency has been acknowledged widely. In Systemic Functional Linguistics (SFL), collocation is known as one prominent member of the super-ordinate lexical cohesion, which contributes significantly to the textual coherence, together with grammatical cohesion and structural cohesion (Halliday & Hasan, 1985). Collocation is also viewed as the hallmark of truly advanced English learners since the higher the learners’ proficiency is, the more they tend to use collocation (Bazzaz & Samad, 2011; Hsu, 2007; Zhang, 1993). Further, knowledge of collocation is regarded as part of the native speakers’ communicative competence (Bazzaz & Samad, 2011); and lack of the knowledge is the most important sign of foreignness among foreign language learners (McArthur, 1992; McCarthy, 1990). Taking the importance of collocation into account, this study is aimed to shed light on Indonesian EFL learners’ levels of collocational competence. In the study, the collocational competence is restricted to v+n and adj+n of collocation but broken down into productive and receptive competence, about which little work has been done (Henriksen, 2013). For this purpose, 49 second-year students of an English department in a state polytechnic were chosen as the subjects. Two sets of tests (filling in the blanks and multiple-choice) were administered to obtain the data of the subjects’ levels of productive and receptive competence and to gain information of which type was more problematic for the learners. The test instruments were designed by referring to Brashi’s (2006) test model, and Koya’s (2003). In the analysis of the data, interpretive-qualitative method was used primarily to obtain broad explanatory information. The data analysis showed that the scores of productive competence were lower than those of receptive competence in both v+n and adj+n collocation. The analysis also revealed that the scores of productive and receptive competence in v+n collocation were higher than those of productive and receptive competence in adj+n collocation. The finding comes as a surprise since it turns out adj+n collocation is more problematic than v+n collocation both productively and receptively. Much research, by contrast, has reported that mistakes in v+n collocation are typical (Al-Zahrani, 1998; Nesselhauf, 2003; Liu, 1999; Sun, 2004). A conclusion has even been drawn that “v+n collocation is more difficult than adj+n collocation” (Kuo, 2009, p. 148). Though more studies are needed to support its finding, this research suggests the type of collocation deserve to get more attention from researchers.
first_indexed 2024-12-21T22:36:31Z
format Article
id doaj.art-14f03de66f7b46cbbb47248375b86389
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2301-9468
2502-6747
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-21T22:36:31Z
publishDate 2017-05-01
publisher Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia
record_format Article
series Indonesian Journal of Applied Linguistics
spelling doaj.art-14f03de66f7b46cbbb47248375b863892022-12-21T18:47:57ZengUniversitas Pendidikan IndonesiaIndonesian Journal of Applied Linguistics2301-94682502-67472017-05-017118920010.17509/ijal.v7i1.68744969THE INVESTIGATION OF PRODUCTIVE AND RECEPTIVE COMPETENCE IN V+N AND ADJ+N COLLOCATIONS AMONG INDONESIAN EFL LEARNERSSaudin Saudin0Iis Sulyaningsih1Lina Meilinda2Politeknik Negeri BandungPoliteknik Negeri BandungPoliteknik Negeri BandungThe important role of collocation in learners’ language proficiency has been acknowledged widely. In Systemic Functional Linguistics (SFL), collocation is known as one prominent member of the super-ordinate lexical cohesion, which contributes significantly to the textual coherence, together with grammatical cohesion and structural cohesion (Halliday & Hasan, 1985). Collocation is also viewed as the hallmark of truly advanced English learners since the higher the learners’ proficiency is, the more they tend to use collocation (Bazzaz & Samad, 2011; Hsu, 2007; Zhang, 1993). Further, knowledge of collocation is regarded as part of the native speakers’ communicative competence (Bazzaz & Samad, 2011); and lack of the knowledge is the most important sign of foreignness among foreign language learners (McArthur, 1992; McCarthy, 1990). Taking the importance of collocation into account, this study is aimed to shed light on Indonesian EFL learners’ levels of collocational competence. In the study, the collocational competence is restricted to v+n and adj+n of collocation but broken down into productive and receptive competence, about which little work has been done (Henriksen, 2013). For this purpose, 49 second-year students of an English department in a state polytechnic were chosen as the subjects. Two sets of tests (filling in the blanks and multiple-choice) were administered to obtain the data of the subjects’ levels of productive and receptive competence and to gain information of which type was more problematic for the learners. The test instruments were designed by referring to Brashi’s (2006) test model, and Koya’s (2003). In the analysis of the data, interpretive-qualitative method was used primarily to obtain broad explanatory information. The data analysis showed that the scores of productive competence were lower than those of receptive competence in both v+n and adj+n collocation. The analysis also revealed that the scores of productive and receptive competence in v+n collocation were higher than those of productive and receptive competence in adj+n collocation. The finding comes as a surprise since it turns out adj+n collocation is more problematic than v+n collocation both productively and receptively. Much research, by contrast, has reported that mistakes in v+n collocation are typical (Al-Zahrani, 1998; Nesselhauf, 2003; Liu, 1999; Sun, 2004). A conclusion has even been drawn that “v+n collocation is more difficult than adj+n collocation” (Kuo, 2009, p. 148). Though more studies are needed to support its finding, this research suggests the type of collocation deserve to get more attention from researchers.http://ejournal.upi.edu/index.php/IJAL/article/view/6874SFLEFLcohesioncoherencecollocationproductive and receptive competence
spellingShingle Saudin Saudin
Iis Sulyaningsih
Lina Meilinda
THE INVESTIGATION OF PRODUCTIVE AND RECEPTIVE COMPETENCE IN V+N AND ADJ+N COLLOCATIONS AMONG INDONESIAN EFL LEARNERS
Indonesian Journal of Applied Linguistics
SFL
EFL
cohesion
coherence
collocation
productive and receptive competence
title THE INVESTIGATION OF PRODUCTIVE AND RECEPTIVE COMPETENCE IN V+N AND ADJ+N COLLOCATIONS AMONG INDONESIAN EFL LEARNERS
title_full THE INVESTIGATION OF PRODUCTIVE AND RECEPTIVE COMPETENCE IN V+N AND ADJ+N COLLOCATIONS AMONG INDONESIAN EFL LEARNERS
title_fullStr THE INVESTIGATION OF PRODUCTIVE AND RECEPTIVE COMPETENCE IN V+N AND ADJ+N COLLOCATIONS AMONG INDONESIAN EFL LEARNERS
title_full_unstemmed THE INVESTIGATION OF PRODUCTIVE AND RECEPTIVE COMPETENCE IN V+N AND ADJ+N COLLOCATIONS AMONG INDONESIAN EFL LEARNERS
title_short THE INVESTIGATION OF PRODUCTIVE AND RECEPTIVE COMPETENCE IN V+N AND ADJ+N COLLOCATIONS AMONG INDONESIAN EFL LEARNERS
title_sort investigation of productive and receptive competence in v n and adj n collocations among indonesian efl learners
topic SFL
EFL
cohesion
coherence
collocation
productive and receptive competence
url http://ejournal.upi.edu/index.php/IJAL/article/view/6874
work_keys_str_mv AT saudinsaudin theinvestigationofproductiveandreceptivecompetenceinvnandadjncollocationsamongindonesianefllearners
AT iissulyaningsih theinvestigationofproductiveandreceptivecompetenceinvnandadjncollocationsamongindonesianefllearners
AT linameilinda theinvestigationofproductiveandreceptivecompetenceinvnandadjncollocationsamongindonesianefllearners
AT saudinsaudin investigationofproductiveandreceptivecompetenceinvnandadjncollocationsamongindonesianefllearners
AT iissulyaningsih investigationofproductiveandreceptivecompetenceinvnandadjncollocationsamongindonesianefllearners
AT linameilinda investigationofproductiveandreceptivecompetenceinvnandadjncollocationsamongindonesianefllearners