Bioavailability of iron measurement in two nutrients multiple solutions by in vitro and in vivo: a comparative methodology between methods

Objectives: The bioavailability of dietary iron present in a nutritional formulation may be evaluated by in vitro and in vivo methods since they provide for a cohesive line study and provided in the literature. The aim of this study was to evaluate the bioavailability of iron targeting a comparative...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Luciana Bueno, Juliana C. Pizzo, Osvaldo Freitas, Fernando Barbosa Junior, José Ernesto dos Santos, Julio Sergio Marchini, José Eduardo Dutra-de-Oliveira
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Arán Ediciones, S. L. 2013-02-01
Series:Nutrición Hospitalaria
Subjects:
Online Access:http://scielo.isciii.es/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0212-16112013000100012&lng=en&tlng=en
_version_ 1818431588003741696
author Luciana Bueno
Juliana C. Pizzo
Osvaldo Freitas
Fernando Barbosa Junior
José Ernesto dos Santos
Julio Sergio Marchini
José Eduardo Dutra-de-Oliveira
author_facet Luciana Bueno
Juliana C. Pizzo
Osvaldo Freitas
Fernando Barbosa Junior
José Ernesto dos Santos
Julio Sergio Marchini
José Eduardo Dutra-de-Oliveira
author_sort Luciana Bueno
collection DOAJ
description Objectives: The bioavailability of dietary iron present in a nutritional formulation may be evaluated by in vitro and in vivo methods since they provide for a cohesive line study and provided in the literature. The aim of this study was to evaluate the bioavailability of iron targeting a comparative analysis of two nutritional supplement formulations (A and B). Methods: For this study were using in vitro and in vivo methods, both described in the literature for availability of iron in an enteral feeding after ingestion supplement nutrition with much nutrients. Results: The results obtained by in vitro simulation of the human gastrointestinal tract were 0.70 ± 0.02 and 0.80 ± 0.01 % iron availability by formulations A and B. In vivo studies, as measured by the curves of serum iron in humans after ingestion of formulations allowed the calculation of coefficient of variation Δ < 0, indicating that there was a low absorption of iron. The bioavailability of iron as two multinutrients solutions obtained by in vitro and in vivo showed that there were comparisons of those methodologies used in this study.
first_indexed 2024-12-14T15:51:41Z
format Article
id doaj.art-14f37cccf4c54916b841955b13021b76
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 0212-1611
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-14T15:51:41Z
publishDate 2013-02-01
publisher Arán Ediciones, S. L.
record_format Article
series Nutrición Hospitalaria
spelling doaj.art-14f37cccf4c54916b841955b13021b762022-12-21T22:55:21ZengArán Ediciones, S. L.Nutrición Hospitalaria0212-16112013-02-01281939910.3305/nh.2013.28.1.5965S0212-16112013000100012Bioavailability of iron measurement in two nutrients multiple solutions by in vitro and in vivo: a comparative methodology between methodsLuciana Bueno0Juliana C. Pizzo1Osvaldo Freitas2Fernando Barbosa Junior3José Ernesto dos Santos4Julio Sergio Marchini5José Eduardo Dutra-de-Oliveira6Universidade de São PauloUniversidade de São PauloUniversidade de São PauloUniversidade de São PauloUniversidade de São PauloUniversidade de São PauloUniversidade de São PauloObjectives: The bioavailability of dietary iron present in a nutritional formulation may be evaluated by in vitro and in vivo methods since they provide for a cohesive line study and provided in the literature. The aim of this study was to evaluate the bioavailability of iron targeting a comparative analysis of two nutritional supplement formulations (A and B). Methods: For this study were using in vitro and in vivo methods, both described in the literature for availability of iron in an enteral feeding after ingestion supplement nutrition with much nutrients. Results: The results obtained by in vitro simulation of the human gastrointestinal tract were 0.70 ± 0.02 and 0.80 ± 0.01 % iron availability by formulations A and B. In vivo studies, as measured by the curves of serum iron in humans after ingestion of formulations allowed the calculation of coefficient of variation Δ < 0, indicating that there was a low absorption of iron. The bioavailability of iron as two multinutrients solutions obtained by in vitro and in vivo showed that there were comparisons of those methodologies used in this study.http://scielo.isciii.es/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0212-16112013000100012&lng=en&tlng=enBiodisponibilidadHierroIn vitroIn vivo
spellingShingle Luciana Bueno
Juliana C. Pizzo
Osvaldo Freitas
Fernando Barbosa Junior
José Ernesto dos Santos
Julio Sergio Marchini
José Eduardo Dutra-de-Oliveira
Bioavailability of iron measurement in two nutrients multiple solutions by in vitro and in vivo: a comparative methodology between methods
Nutrición Hospitalaria
Biodisponibilidad
Hierro
In vitro
In vivo
title Bioavailability of iron measurement in two nutrients multiple solutions by in vitro and in vivo: a comparative methodology between methods
title_full Bioavailability of iron measurement in two nutrients multiple solutions by in vitro and in vivo: a comparative methodology between methods
title_fullStr Bioavailability of iron measurement in two nutrients multiple solutions by in vitro and in vivo: a comparative methodology between methods
title_full_unstemmed Bioavailability of iron measurement in two nutrients multiple solutions by in vitro and in vivo: a comparative methodology between methods
title_short Bioavailability of iron measurement in two nutrients multiple solutions by in vitro and in vivo: a comparative methodology between methods
title_sort bioavailability of iron measurement in two nutrients multiple solutions by in vitro and in vivo a comparative methodology between methods
topic Biodisponibilidad
Hierro
In vitro
In vivo
url http://scielo.isciii.es/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0212-16112013000100012&lng=en&tlng=en
work_keys_str_mv AT lucianabueno bioavailabilityofironmeasurementintwonutrientsmultiplesolutionsbyinvitroandinvivoacomparativemethodologybetweenmethods
AT julianacpizzo bioavailabilityofironmeasurementintwonutrientsmultiplesolutionsbyinvitroandinvivoacomparativemethodologybetweenmethods
AT osvaldofreitas bioavailabilityofironmeasurementintwonutrientsmultiplesolutionsbyinvitroandinvivoacomparativemethodologybetweenmethods
AT fernandobarbosajunior bioavailabilityofironmeasurementintwonutrientsmultiplesolutionsbyinvitroandinvivoacomparativemethodologybetweenmethods
AT joseernestodossantos bioavailabilityofironmeasurementintwonutrientsmultiplesolutionsbyinvitroandinvivoacomparativemethodologybetweenmethods
AT juliosergiomarchini bioavailabilityofironmeasurementintwonutrientsmultiplesolutionsbyinvitroandinvivoacomparativemethodologybetweenmethods
AT joseeduardodutradeoliveira bioavailabilityofironmeasurementintwonutrientsmultiplesolutionsbyinvitroandinvivoacomparativemethodologybetweenmethods