Standardised Outcome Reporting for the Nutrition Management of Complex Chronic Disease: A Rapid Review

Individuals with coexisting chronic diseases or with complex chronic disease are among the most challenging and costly patients to treat, placing a growing demand on healthcare systems. Recommending effective treatments, including nutrition interventions, relies on standardised outcome reporting fro...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Savita A Sandhu, Chloe A Angel, Katrina L Campbell, Ingrid J Hickman, Helen L MacLaughlin
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2021-09-01
Series:Nutrients
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/2072-6643/13/10/3388
_version_ 1797513531809071104
author Savita A Sandhu
Chloe A Angel
Katrina L Campbell
Ingrid J Hickman
Helen L MacLaughlin
author_facet Savita A Sandhu
Chloe A Angel
Katrina L Campbell
Ingrid J Hickman
Helen L MacLaughlin
author_sort Savita A Sandhu
collection DOAJ
description Individuals with coexisting chronic diseases or with complex chronic disease are among the most challenging and costly patients to treat, placing a growing demand on healthcare systems. Recommending effective treatments, including nutrition interventions, relies on standardised outcome reporting from randomised controlled trials (RCTs) to enable data synthesis. This rapid review sought to determine how the scope and consistency of the outcomes reported by RCTs investigating nutrition interventions for the management of complex chronic disease compared to what is recommended by the core outcome sets (COS) for individual disease states. Peer-reviewed RCTs published between January 2010 and July 2020 were systematically sourced from PubMed, CINAHL and Embase, and COS were sourced from the International Consortium for Health Outcomes Measurements (ICHOM) and the Core Outcome Measures in Effectiveness Trials (COMET) database. A total of 45 RCTs (43 studies) and 7 COS were identified. Outcomes were extracted from both the RCTs and COS and were organised using COMET Taxonomy Core Areas. A total of 66 outcomes and 439 outcome measures were reported by the RCTs. The RCTs demonstrated extensive outcome heterogeneity, with only five outcomes (5/66, 8%) being reported with relative consistency (cited by ≥50% of publications). Furthermore, the scope of the outcomes reported by studies was limited, with a notable paucity of patient-reported outcomes. Poor agreement (25%) was observed between the outcomes reported in the RCTs and those recommended by the COS. This review urges greater uptake of the existing COS and the development of a COS for complex chronic disease to be considered so that evidence can be better synthesised regarding effective nutrition interventions.
first_indexed 2024-03-10T06:18:51Z
format Article
id doaj.art-151dad67636940d19ca7d65321104ded
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2072-6643
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-10T06:18:51Z
publishDate 2021-09-01
publisher MDPI AG
record_format Article
series Nutrients
spelling doaj.art-151dad67636940d19ca7d65321104ded2023-11-22T19:27:46ZengMDPI AGNutrients2072-66432021-09-011310338810.3390/nu13103388Standardised Outcome Reporting for the Nutrition Management of Complex Chronic Disease: A Rapid ReviewSavita A Sandhu0Chloe A Angel1Katrina L Campbell2Ingrid J Hickman3Helen L MacLaughlin4School of Exercise and Nutrition Sciences, Queensland University of Technology (QUT), Brisbane 4059, AustraliaSchool of Exercise and Nutrition Sciences, Queensland University of Technology (QUT), Brisbane 4059, AustraliaHealthcare Excellence and Innovation, Metro North Hospital and Health Service, Brisbane 4029, AustraliaDepartment of Nutrition and Dietetics, Princess Alexandra Hospital, Brisbane 4102, AustraliaSchool of Exercise and Nutrition Sciences, Queensland University of Technology (QUT), Brisbane 4059, AustraliaIndividuals with coexisting chronic diseases or with complex chronic disease are among the most challenging and costly patients to treat, placing a growing demand on healthcare systems. Recommending effective treatments, including nutrition interventions, relies on standardised outcome reporting from randomised controlled trials (RCTs) to enable data synthesis. This rapid review sought to determine how the scope and consistency of the outcomes reported by RCTs investigating nutrition interventions for the management of complex chronic disease compared to what is recommended by the core outcome sets (COS) for individual disease states. Peer-reviewed RCTs published between January 2010 and July 2020 were systematically sourced from PubMed, CINAHL and Embase, and COS were sourced from the International Consortium for Health Outcomes Measurements (ICHOM) and the Core Outcome Measures in Effectiveness Trials (COMET) database. A total of 45 RCTs (43 studies) and 7 COS were identified. Outcomes were extracted from both the RCTs and COS and were organised using COMET Taxonomy Core Areas. A total of 66 outcomes and 439 outcome measures were reported by the RCTs. The RCTs demonstrated extensive outcome heterogeneity, with only five outcomes (5/66, 8%) being reported with relative consistency (cited by ≥50% of publications). Furthermore, the scope of the outcomes reported by studies was limited, with a notable paucity of patient-reported outcomes. Poor agreement (25%) was observed between the outcomes reported in the RCTs and those recommended by the COS. This review urges greater uptake of the existing COS and the development of a COS for complex chronic disease to be considered so that evidence can be better synthesised regarding effective nutrition interventions.https://www.mdpi.com/2072-6643/13/10/3388rapid reviewoutcomesoutcome measuresnutritionchronic diseasecore outcome set
spellingShingle Savita A Sandhu
Chloe A Angel
Katrina L Campbell
Ingrid J Hickman
Helen L MacLaughlin
Standardised Outcome Reporting for the Nutrition Management of Complex Chronic Disease: A Rapid Review
Nutrients
rapid review
outcomes
outcome measures
nutrition
chronic disease
core outcome set
title Standardised Outcome Reporting for the Nutrition Management of Complex Chronic Disease: A Rapid Review
title_full Standardised Outcome Reporting for the Nutrition Management of Complex Chronic Disease: A Rapid Review
title_fullStr Standardised Outcome Reporting for the Nutrition Management of Complex Chronic Disease: A Rapid Review
title_full_unstemmed Standardised Outcome Reporting for the Nutrition Management of Complex Chronic Disease: A Rapid Review
title_short Standardised Outcome Reporting for the Nutrition Management of Complex Chronic Disease: A Rapid Review
title_sort standardised outcome reporting for the nutrition management of complex chronic disease a rapid review
topic rapid review
outcomes
outcome measures
nutrition
chronic disease
core outcome set
url https://www.mdpi.com/2072-6643/13/10/3388
work_keys_str_mv AT savitaasandhu standardisedoutcomereportingforthenutritionmanagementofcomplexchronicdiseasearapidreview
AT chloeaangel standardisedoutcomereportingforthenutritionmanagementofcomplexchronicdiseasearapidreview
AT katrinalcampbell standardisedoutcomereportingforthenutritionmanagementofcomplexchronicdiseasearapidreview
AT ingridjhickman standardisedoutcomereportingforthenutritionmanagementofcomplexchronicdiseasearapidreview
AT helenlmaclaughlin standardisedoutcomereportingforthenutritionmanagementofcomplexchronicdiseasearapidreview