Impact of a Swept Source-Optical Coherence Tomography Device on Efficiency in Cataract Evaluation and Surgery: A Time-and-Motion Study [Corrigendum]
Multack S, Pan LC, Timmons SK, et al. Clin Ophthalmol. 2023;17:1–13. Page 2, second paragraph from the bottom, fifth sentence, line four, the text “using an SS-OCT biometer” should read “using an SS-OCT w/ORT biometer”. Page 11, second paragraph...
| Main Authors: | , , , , , , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Dove Medical Press
2023-01-01
|
| Series: | Clinical Ophthalmology |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://www.dovepress.com/corrigendum-impact-of-a-swept-source-optical-coherence-tomography-devi-peer-reviewed-fulltext-article-OPTH |
| _version_ | 1811168749537984512 |
|---|---|
| author | Multack S Pan LC Timmons SK Datar M Hsiao CW Babu R Pan SM Woodard L |
| author_facet | Multack S Pan LC Timmons SK Datar M Hsiao CW Babu R Pan SM Woodard L |
| author_sort | Multack S |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | Multack S, Pan LC, Timmons SK, et al. Clin Ophthalmol. 2023;17:1–13.
Page 2, second paragraph from the bottom, fifth sentence, line four, the text “using an SS-OCT biometer” should read “using an SS-OCT w/ORT biometer”.
Page 11, second paragraph, fourth and fifth sentences, the text “All four articles found that the SS-OCT w/ORT biometer has the lowest acquisition rate when compared to all biometers, except when compared to the use of a contact ultrasound biometer. Acquisition rates ranged from 0.6% to 4% for the SS-OCT w/ORT biometer, 3% to 7.4% for the SS-OCT biometer, 15% to 23% for the PCI biometer, and 3% to 21% for the OLCR biometer” should read “All four articles found that the SS-OCT w/ORT biometer has the lowest acquisition failure rate when compared to all biometers, except when compared to the use of a contact ultrasound biometer. Acquisition failure rates ranged from 0.6% to 4% for the SS-OCT w/ORT biometer, 3% to 7.4% for the SS-OCT biometer, 15% to 23% for the PCI biometer, and 3% to 21% for the OLCR biometer”.
The authors apologize for these errors and advise they do not affect the interpretation of the data and the conclusion of the study. |
| first_indexed | 2024-04-10T16:32:02Z |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj.art-152b6457ae694129a831491ef35bf31e |
| institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
| issn | 1177-5483 |
| language | English |
| last_indexed | 2024-04-10T16:32:02Z |
| publishDate | 2023-01-01 |
| publisher | Dove Medical Press |
| record_format | Article |
| series | Clinical Ophthalmology |
| spelling | doaj.art-152b6457ae694129a831491ef35bf31e2023-02-08T22:17:21ZengDove Medical PressClinical Ophthalmology1177-54832023-01-01Volume 1739139281322Impact of a Swept Source-Optical Coherence Tomography Device on Efficiency in Cataract Evaluation and Surgery: A Time-and-Motion Study [Corrigendum]Multack SPan LCTimmons SKDatar MHsiao CWBabu RPan SMWoodard LMultack S, Pan LC, Timmons SK, et al. Clin Ophthalmol. 2023;17:1–13. Page 2, second paragraph from the bottom, fifth sentence, line four, the text “using an SS-OCT biometer” should read “using an SS-OCT w/ORT biometer”. Page 11, second paragraph, fourth and fifth sentences, the text “All four articles found that the SS-OCT w/ORT biometer has the lowest acquisition rate when compared to all biometers, except when compared to the use of a contact ultrasound biometer. Acquisition rates ranged from 0.6% to 4% for the SS-OCT w/ORT biometer, 3% to 7.4% for the SS-OCT biometer, 15% to 23% for the PCI biometer, and 3% to 21% for the OLCR biometer” should read “All four articles found that the SS-OCT w/ORT biometer has the lowest acquisition failure rate when compared to all biometers, except when compared to the use of a contact ultrasound biometer. Acquisition failure rates ranged from 0.6% to 4% for the SS-OCT w/ORT biometer, 3% to 7.4% for the SS-OCT biometer, 15% to 23% for the PCI biometer, and 3% to 21% for the OLCR biometer”. The authors apologize for these errors and advise they do not affect the interpretation of the data and the conclusion of the study.https://www.dovepress.com/corrigendum-impact-of-a-swept-source-optical-coherence-tomography-devi-peer-reviewed-fulltext-article-OPTHcataract surgeryswept-source optical coherence tomography biometertime-and-motion studypreoperative evaluation phase |
| spellingShingle | Multack S Pan LC Timmons SK Datar M Hsiao CW Babu R Pan SM Woodard L Impact of a Swept Source-Optical Coherence Tomography Device on Efficiency in Cataract Evaluation and Surgery: A Time-and-Motion Study [Corrigendum] Clinical Ophthalmology cataract surgery swept-source optical coherence tomography biometer time-and-motion study preoperative evaluation phase |
| title | Impact of a Swept Source-Optical Coherence Tomography Device on Efficiency in Cataract Evaluation and Surgery: A Time-and-Motion Study [Corrigendum] |
| title_full | Impact of a Swept Source-Optical Coherence Tomography Device on Efficiency in Cataract Evaluation and Surgery: A Time-and-Motion Study [Corrigendum] |
| title_fullStr | Impact of a Swept Source-Optical Coherence Tomography Device on Efficiency in Cataract Evaluation and Surgery: A Time-and-Motion Study [Corrigendum] |
| title_full_unstemmed | Impact of a Swept Source-Optical Coherence Tomography Device on Efficiency in Cataract Evaluation and Surgery: A Time-and-Motion Study [Corrigendum] |
| title_short | Impact of a Swept Source-Optical Coherence Tomography Device on Efficiency in Cataract Evaluation and Surgery: A Time-and-Motion Study [Corrigendum] |
| title_sort | impact of a swept source optical coherence tomography device on efficiency in cataract evaluation and surgery a time and motion study corrigendum |
| topic | cataract surgery swept-source optical coherence tomography biometer time-and-motion study preoperative evaluation phase |
| url | https://www.dovepress.com/corrigendum-impact-of-a-swept-source-optical-coherence-tomography-devi-peer-reviewed-fulltext-article-OPTH |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT multacks impactofasweptsourceopticalcoherencetomographydeviceonefficiencyincataractevaluationandsurgeryatimeandmotionstudycorrigendum AT panlc impactofasweptsourceopticalcoherencetomographydeviceonefficiencyincataractevaluationandsurgeryatimeandmotionstudycorrigendum AT timmonssk impactofasweptsourceopticalcoherencetomographydeviceonefficiencyincataractevaluationandsurgeryatimeandmotionstudycorrigendum AT datarm impactofasweptsourceopticalcoherencetomographydeviceonefficiencyincataractevaluationandsurgeryatimeandmotionstudycorrigendum AT hsiaocw impactofasweptsourceopticalcoherencetomographydeviceonefficiencyincataractevaluationandsurgeryatimeandmotionstudycorrigendum AT babur impactofasweptsourceopticalcoherencetomographydeviceonefficiencyincataractevaluationandsurgeryatimeandmotionstudycorrigendum AT pansm impactofasweptsourceopticalcoherencetomographydeviceonefficiencyincataractevaluationandsurgeryatimeandmotionstudycorrigendum AT woodardl impactofasweptsourceopticalcoherencetomographydeviceonefficiencyincataractevaluationandsurgeryatimeandmotionstudycorrigendum |