Animal shelter management of feline leukemia virus and feline immunodeficiency virus infections in cats

Approximately 5% of cats in animal shelters in the United States test positive for either feline leukemia virus (FeLV) or feline immunodeficiency virus (FIV), which translates to more than 100,000 positive cats managed by shelters each year. Little is known about the current status of retroviral man...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Paola Dezubiria, E. Susan Amirian, Keegan Spera, P. Cynda Crawford, Julie K. Levy
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Frontiers Media S.A. 2023-01-01
Series:Frontiers in Veterinary Science
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fvets.2022.1003388/full
_version_ 1797950489888817152
author Paola Dezubiria
E. Susan Amirian
Keegan Spera
P. Cynda Crawford
Julie K. Levy
author_facet Paola Dezubiria
E. Susan Amirian
Keegan Spera
P. Cynda Crawford
Julie K. Levy
author_sort Paola Dezubiria
collection DOAJ
description Approximately 5% of cats in animal shelters in the United States test positive for either feline leukemia virus (FeLV) or feline immunodeficiency virus (FIV), which translates to more than 100,000 positive cats managed by shelters each year. Little is known about the current status of retroviral management in animal shelters, particularly in regions burdened by chronic pet overpopulation and high shelter admissions, such as the southern United States. The purpose of this study was to describe feline retroviral management in Florida shelters. Shelters were surveyed on practices including selection of cats for testing, diagnostic techniques, and outcome options for cats with positive test results. Responses were received from 139 of 153 animal shelters known to admit cats, including 55 municipal shelters (40%), 70 private shelters (50%), and 14 private shelters with municipal contracts (10%). A total of 115 shelters (83%) performed at least some testing, most using combination point-of-care devices for simultaneous FeLV antigen and FIV antibody screening. Of shelters that performed any testing, 56 (49%) tested all cats for FeLV and 52 (45%) tested all cats for both FeLV and FIV. The most common reason for testing was screening adoptable cats (108 shelters; 94%) and cats available for transfer to other organizations (78; 68%). Testing cats in trap-neuter-return/return-to-field programs was least common (21; 18%). Most common outcome options for positive cats included adoption (74; 64%), transfer (62; 54%), and euthanasia (49; 43%). Euthanasia following a positive test result was more common for cats with FeLV (49; 43%) than for cats with FIV (29; 25%) and was more common in municipal shelters, rural shelters, shelters taking in <500 cats a year, and shelters with overall live outcome rates for cats <70%. Although Florida shelter compliance with national guidelines for identification and management of FeLV and FIV positive cats was variable, most had live outcome options for at least some of their cats with positive test results. Increased access to training and practical programmatic tools may help more shelters implement cost-effective testing protocols, reduce risk for transmission to other cats, and support the best outcomes for this vulnerable population of cats.
first_indexed 2024-04-10T22:17:08Z
format Article
id doaj.art-153c3dcf09514deda5d030fbd26597c2
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2297-1769
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-10T22:17:08Z
publishDate 2023-01-01
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format Article
series Frontiers in Veterinary Science
spelling doaj.art-153c3dcf09514deda5d030fbd26597c22023-01-18T07:29:36ZengFrontiers Media S.A.Frontiers in Veterinary Science2297-17692023-01-01910.3389/fvets.2022.10033881003388Animal shelter management of feline leukemia virus and feline immunodeficiency virus infections in catsPaola Dezubiria0E. Susan Amirian1Keegan Spera2P. Cynda Crawford3Julie K. Levy4Maddie's Shelter Medicine Program, College of Veterinary Medicine, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, United StatesResearch Department, Austin Pets Alive!, Austin, TX, United StatesMaddie's Shelter Medicine Program, College of Veterinary Medicine, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, United StatesMaddie's Shelter Medicine Program, College of Veterinary Medicine, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, United StatesMaddie's Shelter Medicine Program, College of Veterinary Medicine, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, United StatesApproximately 5% of cats in animal shelters in the United States test positive for either feline leukemia virus (FeLV) or feline immunodeficiency virus (FIV), which translates to more than 100,000 positive cats managed by shelters each year. Little is known about the current status of retroviral management in animal shelters, particularly in regions burdened by chronic pet overpopulation and high shelter admissions, such as the southern United States. The purpose of this study was to describe feline retroviral management in Florida shelters. Shelters were surveyed on practices including selection of cats for testing, diagnostic techniques, and outcome options for cats with positive test results. Responses were received from 139 of 153 animal shelters known to admit cats, including 55 municipal shelters (40%), 70 private shelters (50%), and 14 private shelters with municipal contracts (10%). A total of 115 shelters (83%) performed at least some testing, most using combination point-of-care devices for simultaneous FeLV antigen and FIV antibody screening. Of shelters that performed any testing, 56 (49%) tested all cats for FeLV and 52 (45%) tested all cats for both FeLV and FIV. The most common reason for testing was screening adoptable cats (108 shelters; 94%) and cats available for transfer to other organizations (78; 68%). Testing cats in trap-neuter-return/return-to-field programs was least common (21; 18%). Most common outcome options for positive cats included adoption (74; 64%), transfer (62; 54%), and euthanasia (49; 43%). Euthanasia following a positive test result was more common for cats with FeLV (49; 43%) than for cats with FIV (29; 25%) and was more common in municipal shelters, rural shelters, shelters taking in <500 cats a year, and shelters with overall live outcome rates for cats <70%. Although Florida shelter compliance with national guidelines for identification and management of FeLV and FIV positive cats was variable, most had live outcome options for at least some of their cats with positive test results. Increased access to training and practical programmatic tools may help more shelters implement cost-effective testing protocols, reduce risk for transmission to other cats, and support the best outcomes for this vulnerable population of cats.https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fvets.2022.1003388/fullfeline leukemia virusfeline immunodeficiency virusanimal sheltercatsdiagnostic testingeuthanasia
spellingShingle Paola Dezubiria
E. Susan Amirian
Keegan Spera
P. Cynda Crawford
Julie K. Levy
Animal shelter management of feline leukemia virus and feline immunodeficiency virus infections in cats
Frontiers in Veterinary Science
feline leukemia virus
feline immunodeficiency virus
animal shelter
cats
diagnostic testing
euthanasia
title Animal shelter management of feline leukemia virus and feline immunodeficiency virus infections in cats
title_full Animal shelter management of feline leukemia virus and feline immunodeficiency virus infections in cats
title_fullStr Animal shelter management of feline leukemia virus and feline immunodeficiency virus infections in cats
title_full_unstemmed Animal shelter management of feline leukemia virus and feline immunodeficiency virus infections in cats
title_short Animal shelter management of feline leukemia virus and feline immunodeficiency virus infections in cats
title_sort animal shelter management of feline leukemia virus and feline immunodeficiency virus infections in cats
topic feline leukemia virus
feline immunodeficiency virus
animal shelter
cats
diagnostic testing
euthanasia
url https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fvets.2022.1003388/full
work_keys_str_mv AT paoladezubiria animalsheltermanagementoffelineleukemiavirusandfelineimmunodeficiencyvirusinfectionsincats
AT esusanamirian animalsheltermanagementoffelineleukemiavirusandfelineimmunodeficiencyvirusinfectionsincats
AT keeganspera animalsheltermanagementoffelineleukemiavirusandfelineimmunodeficiencyvirusinfectionsincats
AT pcyndacrawford animalsheltermanagementoffelineleukemiavirusandfelineimmunodeficiencyvirusinfectionsincats
AT julieklevy animalsheltermanagementoffelineleukemiavirusandfelineimmunodeficiencyvirusinfectionsincats