Effect of common and experimental anti-tuberculosis treatments on Mycobacterium tuberculosis growing as biofilms

Much is known regarding the antibiotic susceptibility of planktonic cultures of Mycobacterium tuberculosis, the bacterium responsible for the lung disease tuberculosis (TB). As planktonically-grown M. tuberculosis are unlikely to be entirely representative of the bacterium during infection, we set o...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: James P. Dalton, Benedict Uy, Narisa Phummarin, Brent R. Copp, William A. Denny, Simon Swift, Siouxsie Wiles
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: PeerJ Inc. 2016-11-01
Series:PeerJ
Subjects:
Online Access:https://peerj.com/articles/2717.pdf
_version_ 1797418848668876800
author James P. Dalton
Benedict Uy
Narisa Phummarin
Brent R. Copp
William A. Denny
Simon Swift
Siouxsie Wiles
author_facet James P. Dalton
Benedict Uy
Narisa Phummarin
Brent R. Copp
William A. Denny
Simon Swift
Siouxsie Wiles
author_sort James P. Dalton
collection DOAJ
description Much is known regarding the antibiotic susceptibility of planktonic cultures of Mycobacterium tuberculosis, the bacterium responsible for the lung disease tuberculosis (TB). As planktonically-grown M. tuberculosis are unlikely to be entirely representative of the bacterium during infection, we set out to determine how effective a range of anti-mycobacterial treatments were against M. tuberculosis growing as a biofilm, a bacterial phenotype known to be more resistant to antibiotic treatment. Light levels from bioluminescently-labelled M. tuberculosis H37Rv (strain BSG001) were used as a surrogate for bacterial viability, and were monitored before and after one week of treatment. After treatment, biofilms were disrupted, washed and inoculated into fresh broth and plated onto solid media to rescue any surviving bacteria. We found that in this phenotypic state M. tuberculosis was resistant to the majority of the compounds tested. Minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs) increased by 20-fold to greater than 1,000-fold, underlying the potential of this phenotype to cause significant problems during treatment.
first_indexed 2024-03-09T06:38:54Z
format Article
id doaj.art-1550deb607ba4325ba3511510b8c1091
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2167-8359
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-09T06:38:54Z
publishDate 2016-11-01
publisher PeerJ Inc.
record_format Article
series PeerJ
spelling doaj.art-1550deb607ba4325ba3511510b8c10912023-12-03T10:53:34ZengPeerJ Inc.PeerJ2167-83592016-11-014e271710.7717/peerj.2717Effect of common and experimental anti-tuberculosis treatments on Mycobacterium tuberculosis growing as biofilmsJames P. Dalton0Benedict Uy1Narisa Phummarin2Brent R. Copp3William A. Denny4Simon Swift5Siouxsie Wiles6Molecular Medicine and Pathology, University of Auckland, Auckland, New ZealandMolecular Medicine and Pathology, University of Auckland, Auckland, New ZealandSchool of Chemical Sciences, University of Auckland, Auckland, New ZealandMaurice Wilkins Centre for Molecular Biodiscovery, Auckland, New ZealandMaurice Wilkins Centre for Molecular Biodiscovery, Auckland, New ZealandMolecular Medicine and Pathology, University of Auckland, Auckland, New ZealandMolecular Medicine and Pathology, University of Auckland, Auckland, New ZealandMuch is known regarding the antibiotic susceptibility of planktonic cultures of Mycobacterium tuberculosis, the bacterium responsible for the lung disease tuberculosis (TB). As planktonically-grown M. tuberculosis are unlikely to be entirely representative of the bacterium during infection, we set out to determine how effective a range of anti-mycobacterial treatments were against M. tuberculosis growing as a biofilm, a bacterial phenotype known to be more resistant to antibiotic treatment. Light levels from bioluminescently-labelled M. tuberculosis H37Rv (strain BSG001) were used as a surrogate for bacterial viability, and were monitored before and after one week of treatment. After treatment, biofilms were disrupted, washed and inoculated into fresh broth and plated onto solid media to rescue any surviving bacteria. We found that in this phenotypic state M. tuberculosis was resistant to the majority of the compounds tested. Minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs) increased by 20-fold to greater than 1,000-fold, underlying the potential of this phenotype to cause significant problems during treatment.https://peerj.com/articles/2717.pdfMycobacterium tuberculosisMTBTBBiofilmPellicleAscorbic acid
spellingShingle James P. Dalton
Benedict Uy
Narisa Phummarin
Brent R. Copp
William A. Denny
Simon Swift
Siouxsie Wiles
Effect of common and experimental anti-tuberculosis treatments on Mycobacterium tuberculosis growing as biofilms
PeerJ
Mycobacterium tuberculosis
MTB
TB
Biofilm
Pellicle
Ascorbic acid
title Effect of common and experimental anti-tuberculosis treatments on Mycobacterium tuberculosis growing as biofilms
title_full Effect of common and experimental anti-tuberculosis treatments on Mycobacterium tuberculosis growing as biofilms
title_fullStr Effect of common and experimental anti-tuberculosis treatments on Mycobacterium tuberculosis growing as biofilms
title_full_unstemmed Effect of common and experimental anti-tuberculosis treatments on Mycobacterium tuberculosis growing as biofilms
title_short Effect of common and experimental anti-tuberculosis treatments on Mycobacterium tuberculosis growing as biofilms
title_sort effect of common and experimental anti tuberculosis treatments on mycobacterium tuberculosis growing as biofilms
topic Mycobacterium tuberculosis
MTB
TB
Biofilm
Pellicle
Ascorbic acid
url https://peerj.com/articles/2717.pdf
work_keys_str_mv AT jamespdalton effectofcommonandexperimentalantituberculosistreatmentsonmycobacteriumtuberculosisgrowingasbiofilms
AT benedictuy effectofcommonandexperimentalantituberculosistreatmentsonmycobacteriumtuberculosisgrowingasbiofilms
AT narisaphummarin effectofcommonandexperimentalantituberculosistreatmentsonmycobacteriumtuberculosisgrowingasbiofilms
AT brentrcopp effectofcommonandexperimentalantituberculosistreatmentsonmycobacteriumtuberculosisgrowingasbiofilms
AT williamadenny effectofcommonandexperimentalantituberculosistreatmentsonmycobacteriumtuberculosisgrowingasbiofilms
AT simonswift effectofcommonandexperimentalantituberculosistreatmentsonmycobacteriumtuberculosisgrowingasbiofilms
AT siouxsiewiles effectofcommonandexperimentalantituberculosistreatmentsonmycobacteriumtuberculosisgrowingasbiofilms