Impact of the combination and replacement of SLR-based low-degree gravity field coefficients in GRACE solutions

Abstract GRACE and GRACE Follow-On (FO) missions provide time-variable gravity field models of unprecedented quality that allow for the hydrological, oceanic, and ice mass change studies on a global scale. However, the very low-degree coefficients derived from GRACE and GRACE-FO are of inferior qual...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Filip Gałdyn, Krzysztof Sośnica
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: SpringerOpen 2024-02-01
Series:Progress in Earth and Planetary Science
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1186/s40645-024-00608-z
_version_ 1827325736504000512
author Filip Gałdyn
Krzysztof Sośnica
author_facet Filip Gałdyn
Krzysztof Sośnica
author_sort Filip Gałdyn
collection DOAJ
description Abstract GRACE and GRACE Follow-On (FO) missions provide time-variable gravity field models of unprecedented quality that allow for the hydrological, oceanic, and ice mass change studies on a global scale. However, the very low-degree coefficients derived from GRACE and GRACE-FO are of inferior quality due to thermal effects acting on satellites and malfunctioning of the onboard accelerometers. Therefore, C20 and C30 coefficients describing the Earth’s oblateness and the pear shape of the Earth, respectively, are being replaced by values derived from satellite laser ranging (SLR) in the standard GRACE solutions. This study assesses the impact of the replacement of low-degree gravity field coefficients in GRACE/GRACE-FO solutions by SLR data on the trend and seasonal signals of ice mass changes in Greenland and Antarctica. We found that the replacement of the low-degree gravity field coefficients changes the estimates of trends by 4, 8, and 22 Gt/year in Greenland, West, and East Antarctica, respectively, depending on the source of SLR coefficients and period for which the coefficients are replaced. In SLR and GRACE solutions, all coefficients of the same order and the same parity of degrees are strongly correlated. Therefore, replacing only two selected coefficients may lead to a biased solution. Thus, we propose to combine GRACE with SLR solutions up to a degree and order 10 × 10 to properly consider the sensitivity of each of the techniques to gravity field coefficients, instead of replacing two coefficients from SLR in GRACE solutions. The combined solution reduces the residual trend of post-glacial rebound from 1.2 to 0.9 Gt/year and from − 57.8 to − 57.0 Gt/year in Scandinavia and South Canada, respectively, when compared to GRACE/GRACE-FO solutions with the replacement of coefficients. The SLR-GRACE combination reduces the noise in the GRACE/GRACE-FO solutions by 8%, from 38 to 35 Gt, in the Fennoscandia region. In the periods when GRACE is at the end of its mission and observations are disrupted, the weights adjust the contribution from SLR and GRACE based on relative ratio of variances from each techniques. Thus, the combined solutions are more consistent with independent geophysical models of glacial isostatic adjustment, and the combinations are affected by smaller noise than the standard GRACE solutions and properly account for different sensitivities of SLR and GRACE techniques to low-degree time-variable gravity field coefficients.
first_indexed 2024-03-07T14:34:58Z
format Article
id doaj.art-15808dd762744ae99d5e0d71a629b576
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2197-4284
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-07T14:34:58Z
publishDate 2024-02-01
publisher SpringerOpen
record_format Article
series Progress in Earth and Planetary Science
spelling doaj.art-15808dd762744ae99d5e0d71a629b5762024-03-05T20:42:31ZengSpringerOpenProgress in Earth and Planetary Science2197-42842024-02-0111112010.1186/s40645-024-00608-zImpact of the combination and replacement of SLR-based low-degree gravity field coefficients in GRACE solutionsFilip Gałdyn0Krzysztof Sośnica1Wroclaw University of Environmental and Life Sciences, Institute Geodesy and GeoinfromaticsWroclaw University of Environmental and Life Sciences, Institute Geodesy and GeoinfromaticsAbstract GRACE and GRACE Follow-On (FO) missions provide time-variable gravity field models of unprecedented quality that allow for the hydrological, oceanic, and ice mass change studies on a global scale. However, the very low-degree coefficients derived from GRACE and GRACE-FO are of inferior quality due to thermal effects acting on satellites and malfunctioning of the onboard accelerometers. Therefore, C20 and C30 coefficients describing the Earth’s oblateness and the pear shape of the Earth, respectively, are being replaced by values derived from satellite laser ranging (SLR) in the standard GRACE solutions. This study assesses the impact of the replacement of low-degree gravity field coefficients in GRACE/GRACE-FO solutions by SLR data on the trend and seasonal signals of ice mass changes in Greenland and Antarctica. We found that the replacement of the low-degree gravity field coefficients changes the estimates of trends by 4, 8, and 22 Gt/year in Greenland, West, and East Antarctica, respectively, depending on the source of SLR coefficients and period for which the coefficients are replaced. In SLR and GRACE solutions, all coefficients of the same order and the same parity of degrees are strongly correlated. Therefore, replacing only two selected coefficients may lead to a biased solution. Thus, we propose to combine GRACE with SLR solutions up to a degree and order 10 × 10 to properly consider the sensitivity of each of the techniques to gravity field coefficients, instead of replacing two coefficients from SLR in GRACE solutions. The combined solution reduces the residual trend of post-glacial rebound from 1.2 to 0.9 Gt/year and from − 57.8 to − 57.0 Gt/year in Scandinavia and South Canada, respectively, when compared to GRACE/GRACE-FO solutions with the replacement of coefficients. The SLR-GRACE combination reduces the noise in the GRACE/GRACE-FO solutions by 8%, from 38 to 35 Gt, in the Fennoscandia region. In the periods when GRACE is at the end of its mission and observations are disrupted, the weights adjust the contribution from SLR and GRACE based on relative ratio of variances from each techniques. Thus, the combined solutions are more consistent with independent geophysical models of glacial isostatic adjustment, and the combinations are affected by smaller noise than the standard GRACE solutions and properly account for different sensitivities of SLR and GRACE techniques to low-degree time-variable gravity field coefficients.https://doi.org/10.1186/s40645-024-00608-zGRACESatellite laser rangingIce mass lossGreenlandAntarcticaGIA
spellingShingle Filip Gałdyn
Krzysztof Sośnica
Impact of the combination and replacement of SLR-based low-degree gravity field coefficients in GRACE solutions
Progress in Earth and Planetary Science
GRACE
Satellite laser ranging
Ice mass loss
Greenland
Antarctica
GIA
title Impact of the combination and replacement of SLR-based low-degree gravity field coefficients in GRACE solutions
title_full Impact of the combination and replacement of SLR-based low-degree gravity field coefficients in GRACE solutions
title_fullStr Impact of the combination and replacement of SLR-based low-degree gravity field coefficients in GRACE solutions
title_full_unstemmed Impact of the combination and replacement of SLR-based low-degree gravity field coefficients in GRACE solutions
title_short Impact of the combination and replacement of SLR-based low-degree gravity field coefficients in GRACE solutions
title_sort impact of the combination and replacement of slr based low degree gravity field coefficients in grace solutions
topic GRACE
Satellite laser ranging
Ice mass loss
Greenland
Antarctica
GIA
url https://doi.org/10.1186/s40645-024-00608-z
work_keys_str_mv AT filipgałdyn impactofthecombinationandreplacementofslrbasedlowdegreegravityfieldcoefficientsingracesolutions
AT krzysztofsosnica impactofthecombinationandreplacementofslrbasedlowdegreegravityfieldcoefficientsingracesolutions