Accuracy of 68Ga-PSMA PET-CT and PET-MRI in lymph node staging for localized prostate cancer

ABSTRACT Objective To evaluate the predictive value of positron emission computed tomography or magnetic resonance (PET-CT and PET-MRI) using gallium-68-labeled prostate-specific membrane antigen (68Ga-PSMA) in lymph node involvement in prostate cancer. Methods A retrospective study comprising 9...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Álan Roger Gomes Barbosa, Breno Santos Amaral, Danilo Budib Lourenço, Bianca Bianco, Felipe Arakaki Gushiken, Marcelo Apezzato, Júlia Francisco Silva, Marcelo Livorsi da Cunha, Reneé Zon Filippi, Ronaldo Hueb Baroni, Gustavo Caserta Lemos, Arie Carneiro
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Instituto Israelita de Ensino e Pesquisa Albert Einstein 2022-05-01
Series:Einstein (São Paulo)
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1679-45082022000100248&lng=en&tlng=en
_version_ 1818212907464261632
author Álan Roger Gomes Barbosa
Breno Santos Amaral
Danilo Budib Lourenço
Bianca Bianco
Felipe Arakaki Gushiken
Marcelo Apezzato
Júlia Francisco Silva
Marcelo Livorsi da Cunha
Reneé Zon Filippi
Ronaldo Hueb Baroni
Gustavo Caserta Lemos
Arie Carneiro
author_facet Álan Roger Gomes Barbosa
Breno Santos Amaral
Danilo Budib Lourenço
Bianca Bianco
Felipe Arakaki Gushiken
Marcelo Apezzato
Júlia Francisco Silva
Marcelo Livorsi da Cunha
Reneé Zon Filippi
Ronaldo Hueb Baroni
Gustavo Caserta Lemos
Arie Carneiro
author_sort Álan Roger Gomes Barbosa
collection DOAJ
description ABSTRACT Objective To evaluate the predictive value of positron emission computed tomography or magnetic resonance (PET-CT and PET-MRI) using gallium-68-labeled prostate-specific membrane antigen (68Ga-PSMA) in lymph node involvement in prostate cancer. Methods A retrospective study comprising 91 patients diagnosed with prostate cancer between 2016 to 2020, who underwent 68Ga-PSMA PET-CT or PET-MRI for staging before prostatectomy. The patients were divided into Group 1, with 65 patients with satisfactory pathological lymph node analysis, and Group 2, with 91 patients representing the sum of patients with pathological lymph node analysis and those with postoperative prostate-specific antigen within 60 days after surgery. Receiver Operating Characteristic curves were used to assess accuracy of predictive capacity of imaging exams for lymph node involvement. Results Regarding local clinical staging, the groups showed similar results, and 50% were classified as staging T2a. The accuracy of 68Ga-PSMA PET-CT for prostate cancer lymph node staging was 86.5% (95%CI 0.74-0.94; p=0.06), with a sensitivity of 58.3% and specificity of 95%. The accuracy of 68Ga-PSMA PET-MRI was 84.6% (95%CI 0.69-0.94; p=0.09), with a sensitivity of 40% and specificity of 100%. Considering both 68Ga-PSMA PET-CT and PET-MRI, the accuracy was 85.7% (95%CI 0.76-0.92; p=0.015), with sensitivity of 50% and specificity of 97%. Conclusion The imaging tests 68Ga-PSMA PET-CT and PET-MRI were highly accurate to detect preoperative lymph node involvement, and could be useful tools to indicate the need for extended lymph node dissection during radical prostatectomy.
first_indexed 2024-12-12T05:55:51Z
format Article
id doaj.art-15bca67af6254c3d862c18f1adba82e9
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2317-6385
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-12T05:55:51Z
publishDate 2022-05-01
publisher Instituto Israelita de Ensino e Pesquisa Albert Einstein
record_format Article
series Einstein (São Paulo)
spelling doaj.art-15bca67af6254c3d862c18f1adba82e92022-12-22T00:35:34ZengInstituto Israelita de Ensino e Pesquisa Albert EinsteinEinstein (São Paulo)2317-63852022-05-012010.31744/einstein_journal/2022ao6599Accuracy of 68Ga-PSMA PET-CT and PET-MRI in lymph node staging for localized prostate cancerÁlan Roger Gomes Barbosahttps://orcid.org/0000-0001-9892-6458Breno Santos Amaralhttps://orcid.org/0000-0002-4586-8183Danilo Budib Lourençohttps://orcid.org/0000-0002-7536-1148Bianca Biancohttps://orcid.org/0000-0001-8669-3562Felipe Arakaki Gushikenhttps://orcid.org/0000-0002-5710-2599Marcelo Apezzatohttps://orcid.org/0000-0003-1068-6600Júlia Francisco Silvahttps://orcid.org/0000-0002-6169-3117Marcelo Livorsi da Cunhahttps://orcid.org/0000-0002-5416-5439Reneé Zon Filippihttps://orcid.org/0000-0002-1250-0876Ronaldo Hueb Baronihttps://orcid.org/0000-0001-8762-0875Gustavo Caserta Lemoshttps://orcid.org/0000-0001-8818-4964Arie Carneirohttps://orcid.org/0000-0002-0152-0513ABSTRACT Objective To evaluate the predictive value of positron emission computed tomography or magnetic resonance (PET-CT and PET-MRI) using gallium-68-labeled prostate-specific membrane antigen (68Ga-PSMA) in lymph node involvement in prostate cancer. Methods A retrospective study comprising 91 patients diagnosed with prostate cancer between 2016 to 2020, who underwent 68Ga-PSMA PET-CT or PET-MRI for staging before prostatectomy. The patients were divided into Group 1, with 65 patients with satisfactory pathological lymph node analysis, and Group 2, with 91 patients representing the sum of patients with pathological lymph node analysis and those with postoperative prostate-specific antigen within 60 days after surgery. Receiver Operating Characteristic curves were used to assess accuracy of predictive capacity of imaging exams for lymph node involvement. Results Regarding local clinical staging, the groups showed similar results, and 50% were classified as staging T2a. The accuracy of 68Ga-PSMA PET-CT for prostate cancer lymph node staging was 86.5% (95%CI 0.74-0.94; p=0.06), with a sensitivity of 58.3% and specificity of 95%. The accuracy of 68Ga-PSMA PET-MRI was 84.6% (95%CI 0.69-0.94; p=0.09), with a sensitivity of 40% and specificity of 100%. Considering both 68Ga-PSMA PET-CT and PET-MRI, the accuracy was 85.7% (95%CI 0.76-0.92; p=0.015), with sensitivity of 50% and specificity of 97%. Conclusion The imaging tests 68Ga-PSMA PET-CT and PET-MRI were highly accurate to detect preoperative lymph node involvement, and could be useful tools to indicate the need for extended lymph node dissection during radical prostatectomy.http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1679-45082022000100248&lng=en&tlng=enProstatic neoplasmsLymph nodesProstatectomyData accuracyPositron emission tomography computed tomographyProstate-specific antigenGallium
spellingShingle Álan Roger Gomes Barbosa
Breno Santos Amaral
Danilo Budib Lourenço
Bianca Bianco
Felipe Arakaki Gushiken
Marcelo Apezzato
Júlia Francisco Silva
Marcelo Livorsi da Cunha
Reneé Zon Filippi
Ronaldo Hueb Baroni
Gustavo Caserta Lemos
Arie Carneiro
Accuracy of 68Ga-PSMA PET-CT and PET-MRI in lymph node staging for localized prostate cancer
Einstein (São Paulo)
Prostatic neoplasms
Lymph nodes
Prostatectomy
Data accuracy
Positron emission tomography computed tomography
Prostate-specific antigen
Gallium
title Accuracy of 68Ga-PSMA PET-CT and PET-MRI in lymph node staging for localized prostate cancer
title_full Accuracy of 68Ga-PSMA PET-CT and PET-MRI in lymph node staging for localized prostate cancer
title_fullStr Accuracy of 68Ga-PSMA PET-CT and PET-MRI in lymph node staging for localized prostate cancer
title_full_unstemmed Accuracy of 68Ga-PSMA PET-CT and PET-MRI in lymph node staging for localized prostate cancer
title_short Accuracy of 68Ga-PSMA PET-CT and PET-MRI in lymph node staging for localized prostate cancer
title_sort accuracy of 68ga psma pet ct and pet mri in lymph node staging for localized prostate cancer
topic Prostatic neoplasms
Lymph nodes
Prostatectomy
Data accuracy
Positron emission tomography computed tomography
Prostate-specific antigen
Gallium
url http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1679-45082022000100248&lng=en&tlng=en
work_keys_str_mv AT alanrogergomesbarbosa accuracyof68gapsmapetctandpetmriinlymphnodestagingforlocalizedprostatecancer
AT brenosantosamaral accuracyof68gapsmapetctandpetmriinlymphnodestagingforlocalizedprostatecancer
AT danilobudiblourenco accuracyof68gapsmapetctandpetmriinlymphnodestagingforlocalizedprostatecancer
AT biancabianco accuracyof68gapsmapetctandpetmriinlymphnodestagingforlocalizedprostatecancer
AT felipearakakigushiken accuracyof68gapsmapetctandpetmriinlymphnodestagingforlocalizedprostatecancer
AT marceloapezzato accuracyof68gapsmapetctandpetmriinlymphnodestagingforlocalizedprostatecancer
AT juliafranciscosilva accuracyof68gapsmapetctandpetmriinlymphnodestagingforlocalizedprostatecancer
AT marcelolivorsidacunha accuracyof68gapsmapetctandpetmriinlymphnodestagingforlocalizedprostatecancer
AT reneezonfilippi accuracyof68gapsmapetctandpetmriinlymphnodestagingforlocalizedprostatecancer
AT ronaldohuebbaroni accuracyof68gapsmapetctandpetmriinlymphnodestagingforlocalizedprostatecancer
AT gustavocasertalemos accuracyof68gapsmapetctandpetmriinlymphnodestagingforlocalizedprostatecancer
AT ariecarneiro accuracyof68gapsmapetctandpetmriinlymphnodestagingforlocalizedprostatecancer