Looking Inside the Strategic Plans: Strengths and Weaknesses of Turkish Higher Education Institutions

As strengths and weaknesses are regarded as internal features of an organization, the present study focused on strengths and weaknesses of Turkish public universities by analyzing the SWOTs (Strengths, Weaknesses, Opportunities, Threats) of twenty higher education institutions. By applying qualitat...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Abdullah Selvitopu, Metin Kaya
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Hipatia Press 2020-02-01
Series:Qualitative Research in Education
Subjects:
Online Access:https://hipatiapress.com/hpjournals/index.php/qre/article/view/4111
_version_ 1797800274954289152
author Abdullah Selvitopu
Metin Kaya
author_facet Abdullah Selvitopu
Metin Kaya
author_sort Abdullah Selvitopu
collection DOAJ
description As strengths and weaknesses are regarded as internal features of an organization, the present study focused on strengths and weaknesses of Turkish public universities by analyzing the SWOTs (Strengths, Weaknesses, Opportunities, Threats) of twenty higher education institutions. By applying qualitative content analytical tools, we tried to make some comparisons, twenty universities, ten ranked at the top and ten at the bottom of the URAP list, were chosen to analyze the strengths and weaknesses. Findings show that all universities top or bottom ones have internal strengths and weaknesses on their own. The strengths of universities differ according to their size, field of service, structure, history and geographical locations. Top universities which are in big size, have a deeply rooted history and situated in a better geographical location can enjoy the strengths as qualified faculty members, organizational culture, internationalization process, infrastructure and good alumni relations. On the other hand, bottom universities which have not got those advantages deal with other strengths such as young faculty members, organizational support and internal communication. As for the weaknesses, top universities need more budget and acceptable rate of faculty member and student. Bottom ones need more qualified faculty members, students and staff. As they are located in disadvantageous regions, they are in need of some promotions to attract faculties, staff, national and international students. In addition, they also should be aware of the contributions of good alumni relations.
first_indexed 2024-03-13T04:32:46Z
format Article
id doaj.art-15c3be53b2414b989c746f3c4f221fe7
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2014-6418
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-13T04:32:46Z
publishDate 2020-02-01
publisher Hipatia Press
record_format Article
series Qualitative Research in Education
spelling doaj.art-15c3be53b2414b989c746f3c4f221fe72023-06-19T08:30:43ZengHipatia PressQualitative Research in Education2014-64182020-02-019110.17583/qre.2020.4111Looking Inside the Strategic Plans: Strengths and Weaknesses of Turkish Higher Education InstitutionsAbdullah Selvitopu0Metin Kaya1Karamanoglu Mehmetbey UniversityBayburt University As strengths and weaknesses are regarded as internal features of an organization, the present study focused on strengths and weaknesses of Turkish public universities by analyzing the SWOTs (Strengths, Weaknesses, Opportunities, Threats) of twenty higher education institutions. By applying qualitative content analytical tools, we tried to make some comparisons, twenty universities, ten ranked at the top and ten at the bottom of the URAP list, were chosen to analyze the strengths and weaknesses. Findings show that all universities top or bottom ones have internal strengths and weaknesses on their own. The strengths of universities differ according to their size, field of service, structure, history and geographical locations. Top universities which are in big size, have a deeply rooted history and situated in a better geographical location can enjoy the strengths as qualified faculty members, organizational culture, internationalization process, infrastructure and good alumni relations. On the other hand, bottom universities which have not got those advantages deal with other strengths such as young faculty members, organizational support and internal communication. As for the weaknesses, top universities need more budget and acceptable rate of faculty member and student. Bottom ones need more qualified faculty members, students and staff. As they are located in disadvantageous regions, they are in need of some promotions to attract faculties, staff, national and international students. In addition, they also should be aware of the contributions of good alumni relations. https://hipatiapress.com/hpjournals/index.php/qre/article/view/4111universitySWOT analysisstrengthsweaknessesTurkey
spellingShingle Abdullah Selvitopu
Metin Kaya
Looking Inside the Strategic Plans: Strengths and Weaknesses of Turkish Higher Education Institutions
Qualitative Research in Education
university
SWOT analysis
strengths
weaknesses
Turkey
title Looking Inside the Strategic Plans: Strengths and Weaknesses of Turkish Higher Education Institutions
title_full Looking Inside the Strategic Plans: Strengths and Weaknesses of Turkish Higher Education Institutions
title_fullStr Looking Inside the Strategic Plans: Strengths and Weaknesses of Turkish Higher Education Institutions
title_full_unstemmed Looking Inside the Strategic Plans: Strengths and Weaknesses of Turkish Higher Education Institutions
title_short Looking Inside the Strategic Plans: Strengths and Weaknesses of Turkish Higher Education Institutions
title_sort looking inside the strategic plans strengths and weaknesses of turkish higher education institutions
topic university
SWOT analysis
strengths
weaknesses
Turkey
url https://hipatiapress.com/hpjournals/index.php/qre/article/view/4111
work_keys_str_mv AT abdullahselvitopu lookinginsidethestrategicplansstrengthsandweaknessesofturkishhighereducationinstitutions
AT metinkaya lookinginsidethestrategicplansstrengthsandweaknessesofturkishhighereducationinstitutions