Salience is in the brain of the beholder: ERPs reflect acoustically salient variables

A recent paper by Boswijk, Loerts & Hilton (Boswijk et al., 2020) in this journal discusses how technological advances allow us to explore the cognitive processing of so-called salient linguistic features, and how this could provide us with quantifiable measures of ‘salience’. The paper conc...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: V. Boswijk, N.H. Hilton, M. Coler, H. Loerts
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Elsevier 2022-01-01
Series:Ampersand
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2215039022000042
_version_ 1811188616262582272
author V. Boswijk
N.H. Hilton
M. Coler
H. Loerts
author_facet V. Boswijk
N.H. Hilton
M. Coler
H. Loerts
author_sort V. Boswijk
collection DOAJ
description A recent paper by Boswijk, Loerts & Hilton (Boswijk et al., 2020) in this journal discusses how technological advances allow us to explore the cognitive processing of so-called salient linguistic features, and how this could provide us with quantifiable measures of ‘salience’. The paper concludes that, although promising, the used measure of pupil dilation seems to be limited as a measure for linguistic salience, and therefore refers future research to other measures, specifically Event Related Potentials (ERPs). In this paper we therefore replicate the Boswijk et al. study using the ERP measure with the hypothesis that linguistic salience evokes distinct ERP components. We use the same materials that were used in the Boswijk et al. (2020) paper to observe changes in Dutch participants' pupil sizes when listening to stimuli containing salient and non-salient variants of linguistic variables.Using Generalized Additive Mixed Modelling (GAMM), we find distinct responses for five of six stimuli categories. We consider our findings in light of the literature on linguistic salience and discuss how our findings relate to the Boswijk et al. (2020) study. We find that ERPs provide a more fine-grained measure of theoretically salient stimuli.
first_indexed 2024-04-11T14:22:58Z
format Article
id doaj.art-15ce720b6eda4d77b0b83b1bcf1c050c
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2215-0390
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-11T14:22:58Z
publishDate 2022-01-01
publisher Elsevier
record_format Article
series Ampersand
spelling doaj.art-15ce720b6eda4d77b0b83b1bcf1c050c2022-12-22T04:19:00ZengElsevierAmpersand2215-03902022-01-019100085Salience is in the brain of the beholder: ERPs reflect acoustically salient variablesV. Boswijk0N.H. Hilton1M. Coler2H. Loerts3Campus Fryslân, University of Groningen, the Netherlands; Cognitive Neuroscience Center (CNC), University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, the Netherlands; Corresponding author. Campus Fryslân, University of Groningen, the Netherlands.Center for Language and Cognition (CLCG), University of Groningen, the NetherlandsCampus Fryslân, University of Groningen, the NetherlandsCenter for Language and Cognition (CLCG), University of Groningen, the Netherlands; Cognitive Neuroscience Center (CNC), University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, the NetherlandsA recent paper by Boswijk, Loerts & Hilton (Boswijk et al., 2020) in this journal discusses how technological advances allow us to explore the cognitive processing of so-called salient linguistic features, and how this could provide us with quantifiable measures of ‘salience’. The paper concludes that, although promising, the used measure of pupil dilation seems to be limited as a measure for linguistic salience, and therefore refers future research to other measures, specifically Event Related Potentials (ERPs). In this paper we therefore replicate the Boswijk et al. study using the ERP measure with the hypothesis that linguistic salience evokes distinct ERP components. We use the same materials that were used in the Boswijk et al. (2020) paper to observe changes in Dutch participants' pupil sizes when listening to stimuli containing salient and non-salient variants of linguistic variables.Using Generalized Additive Mixed Modelling (GAMM), we find distinct responses for five of six stimuli categories. We consider our findings in light of the literature on linguistic salience and discuss how our findings relate to the Boswijk et al. (2020) study. We find that ERPs provide a more fine-grained measure of theoretically salient stimuli.http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2215039022000042Linguistic salienceERPsGAMMsN400Speech processing
spellingShingle V. Boswijk
N.H. Hilton
M. Coler
H. Loerts
Salience is in the brain of the beholder: ERPs reflect acoustically salient variables
Ampersand
Linguistic salience
ERPs
GAMMs
N400
Speech processing
title Salience is in the brain of the beholder: ERPs reflect acoustically salient variables
title_full Salience is in the brain of the beholder: ERPs reflect acoustically salient variables
title_fullStr Salience is in the brain of the beholder: ERPs reflect acoustically salient variables
title_full_unstemmed Salience is in the brain of the beholder: ERPs reflect acoustically salient variables
title_short Salience is in the brain of the beholder: ERPs reflect acoustically salient variables
title_sort salience is in the brain of the beholder erps reflect acoustically salient variables
topic Linguistic salience
ERPs
GAMMs
N400
Speech processing
url http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2215039022000042
work_keys_str_mv AT vboswijk salienceisinthebrainofthebeholdererpsreflectacousticallysalientvariables
AT nhhilton salienceisinthebrainofthebeholdererpsreflectacousticallysalientvariables
AT mcoler salienceisinthebrainofthebeholdererpsreflectacousticallysalientvariables
AT hloerts salienceisinthebrainofthebeholdererpsreflectacousticallysalientvariables