Comparison of onset anesthesia time and injection discomfort of 4% articaine and 2% mepivacaine during teeth extractions
Objective: To investigate the speed of action and injection discomfort of 4% articaine and 2% mepivacaine for upper teeth extractions. Materials and Methods: Forty-five patients were included in the articaine 4% group, and 45 in the mepivacaine 2% control group. After all injections, soft and hard t...
Main Authors: | Giath Gazal, Rashdan Alharbi, Wamiq Musheer Fareed, Esam Omar, Albraa Badr Alolayan, Hassan Al-Zoubi, Ahmad A Alnazzawi |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications
2017-01-01
|
Series: | Saudi Journal of Anaesthesia |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://www.saudija.org/article.asp?issn=1658-354X;year=2017;volume=11;issue=2;spage=152;epage=157;aulast=Gazal |
Similar Items
-
Is Articaine More Potent than Mepivacaine for Use in Oral Surgery?
by: Giath Gazal
Published: (2018-09-01) -
Articaine and mepivacaine buccal infiltration in securing mandibular first molar pulp anesthesia following mepivacaine inferior alveolar nerve block: A randomized, double-blind crossover study
by: Giath Gazal, et al.
Published: (2015-01-01) -
Biological evaluation of the efficacy of two different anesthetic solutions in pain control during extraction of mandibular second primary molars
by: Rasha F. Sharaf, et al.
Published: (2022-03-01) -
Articaine versus Lidocaine in only buccal infiltration anesthesia for the extraction of mandibular anterior teeth. A prospective split-mouth randomized-controlled clinical study
by: Haytham Al-Mahalawy, et al.
Published: (2023-08-01) -
LOCAL ANESTHETICS INDUCED ALLERGIC REACTIONS AND CONFOUNDING FACTORS
by: Andrei Gheorghe Vicovan, et al.
Published: (2019-08-01)