The Sweet and the Bitter: Intertwined Positive and Negative Social Impacts of a Biodiversity Offset

Major developments, such as mines, will often have unavoidable environmental impacts. In such cases, investors, governments, or even a company's own standards increasingly require implementation of biodiversity offsets (investment in conservation with a measurable outcome) with the aim of achie...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Cécile Bidaud, Kate Schreckenberg, Manolotsoa Rabeharison, Patrick Ranjatson, James Gibbons, Julia P.G. Jones
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications 2017-01-01
Series:Conservation & Society
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.conservationandsociety.org/article.asp?issn=0972-4923;year=2017;volume=15;issue=1;spage=1;epage=13;aulast=Bidaud
_version_ 1819264102680231936
author Cécile Bidaud
Kate Schreckenberg
Manolotsoa Rabeharison
Patrick Ranjatson
James Gibbons
Julia P.G. Jones
author_facet Cécile Bidaud
Kate Schreckenberg
Manolotsoa Rabeharison
Patrick Ranjatson
James Gibbons
Julia P.G. Jones
author_sort Cécile Bidaud
collection DOAJ
description Major developments, such as mines, will often have unavoidable environmental impacts. In such cases, investors, governments, or even a company's own standards increasingly require implementation of biodiversity offsets (investment in conservation with a measurable outcome) with the aim of achieving 'no net loss' or even a 'net gain' of biodiversity. Where conservation is achieved by changing the behaviour of people directly using natural resources, the offset might be expected to have social impacts but such impacts have received very little attention. Using the case study of Ambatovy, a major nickel mine in the eastern rainforests of Madagascar and a company at the vanguard of developing biodiversity offsets, we explore local perceptions of the magnitude and distribution of impacts of the biodiversity offset project on local wellbeing. We used both qualitative (key informant interviews and focus group discussions) and quantitative (household survey) methods. We found that the biodiversity offsets, which comprise both conservation restrictions and development activities, influenced wellbeing in a mixture of positive and negative ways. However, overall, respondents felt that they had suffered a net cost from the biodiversity offset. It is a matter of concern that benefits from development activities do not compensate for the costs of the conservation restrictions, that those who bear the costs are not the same people as those who benefit, and that there is a mismatch in timing between the immediate restrictions and the associated development activities which take some time to deliver benefits. These issues matter both from the perspective of environmental justice, and for the long-term sustainability of the biodiversity benefits the offset is supposed to deliver.
first_indexed 2024-12-23T20:24:09Z
format Article
id doaj.art-15f17ed01a21436990c269c201d45c7e
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 0972-4923
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-23T20:24:09Z
publishDate 2017-01-01
publisher Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications
record_format Article
series Conservation & Society
spelling doaj.art-15f17ed01a21436990c269c201d45c7e2022-12-21T17:32:26ZengWolters Kluwer Medknow PublicationsConservation & Society0972-49232017-01-0115111310.4103/0972-4923.196315The Sweet and the Bitter: Intertwined Positive and Negative Social Impacts of a Biodiversity OffsetCécile BidaudKate SchreckenbergManolotsoa RabeharisonPatrick RanjatsonJames GibbonsJulia P.G. JonesMajor developments, such as mines, will often have unavoidable environmental impacts. In such cases, investors, governments, or even a company's own standards increasingly require implementation of biodiversity offsets (investment in conservation with a measurable outcome) with the aim of achieving 'no net loss' or even a 'net gain' of biodiversity. Where conservation is achieved by changing the behaviour of people directly using natural resources, the offset might be expected to have social impacts but such impacts have received very little attention. Using the case study of Ambatovy, a major nickel mine in the eastern rainforests of Madagascar and a company at the vanguard of developing biodiversity offsets, we explore local perceptions of the magnitude and distribution of impacts of the biodiversity offset project on local wellbeing. We used both qualitative (key informant interviews and focus group discussions) and quantitative (household survey) methods. We found that the biodiversity offsets, which comprise both conservation restrictions and development activities, influenced wellbeing in a mixture of positive and negative ways. However, overall, respondents felt that they had suffered a net cost from the biodiversity offset. It is a matter of concern that benefits from development activities do not compensate for the costs of the conservation restrictions, that those who bear the costs are not the same people as those who benefit, and that there is a mismatch in timing between the immediate restrictions and the associated development activities which take some time to deliver benefits. These issues matter both from the perspective of environmental justice, and for the long-term sustainability of the biodiversity benefits the offset is supposed to deliver.http://www.conservationandsociety.org/article.asp?issn=0972-4923;year=2017;volume=15;issue=1;spage=1;epage=13;aulast=BidaudMadagascarprotected areaenvironmental justiceminingsustainable developmentforest use
spellingShingle Cécile Bidaud
Kate Schreckenberg
Manolotsoa Rabeharison
Patrick Ranjatson
James Gibbons
Julia P.G. Jones
The Sweet and the Bitter: Intertwined Positive and Negative Social Impacts of a Biodiversity Offset
Conservation & Society
Madagascar
protected area
environmental justice
mining
sustainable development
forest use
title The Sweet and the Bitter: Intertwined Positive and Negative Social Impacts of a Biodiversity Offset
title_full The Sweet and the Bitter: Intertwined Positive and Negative Social Impacts of a Biodiversity Offset
title_fullStr The Sweet and the Bitter: Intertwined Positive and Negative Social Impacts of a Biodiversity Offset
title_full_unstemmed The Sweet and the Bitter: Intertwined Positive and Negative Social Impacts of a Biodiversity Offset
title_short The Sweet and the Bitter: Intertwined Positive and Negative Social Impacts of a Biodiversity Offset
title_sort sweet and the bitter intertwined positive and negative social impacts of a biodiversity offset
topic Madagascar
protected area
environmental justice
mining
sustainable development
forest use
url http://www.conservationandsociety.org/article.asp?issn=0972-4923;year=2017;volume=15;issue=1;spage=1;epage=13;aulast=Bidaud
work_keys_str_mv AT cecilebidaud thesweetandthebitterintertwinedpositiveandnegativesocialimpactsofabiodiversityoffset
AT kateschreckenberg thesweetandthebitterintertwinedpositiveandnegativesocialimpactsofabiodiversityoffset
AT manolotsoarabeharison thesweetandthebitterintertwinedpositiveandnegativesocialimpactsofabiodiversityoffset
AT patrickranjatson thesweetandthebitterintertwinedpositiveandnegativesocialimpactsofabiodiversityoffset
AT jamesgibbons thesweetandthebitterintertwinedpositiveandnegativesocialimpactsofabiodiversityoffset
AT juliapgjones thesweetandthebitterintertwinedpositiveandnegativesocialimpactsofabiodiversityoffset
AT cecilebidaud sweetandthebitterintertwinedpositiveandnegativesocialimpactsofabiodiversityoffset
AT kateschreckenberg sweetandthebitterintertwinedpositiveandnegativesocialimpactsofabiodiversityoffset
AT manolotsoarabeharison sweetandthebitterintertwinedpositiveandnegativesocialimpactsofabiodiversityoffset
AT patrickranjatson sweetandthebitterintertwinedpositiveandnegativesocialimpactsofabiodiversityoffset
AT jamesgibbons sweetandthebitterintertwinedpositiveandnegativesocialimpactsofabiodiversityoffset
AT juliapgjones sweetandthebitterintertwinedpositiveandnegativesocialimpactsofabiodiversityoffset