Artisanal Mining River Dredge Detection Using SAR: A Method Comparison

Challenges exist in monitoring artisanal and small-scale mining (ASM) activities, given their dynamic and often informal nature. ASM takes form through various techniques and scales, including riverine dredging, which often targets the abundant alluvial gold deposits in South America. Remote sensing...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Marissa A. Alessi, Peter G. Chirico, Marco Millones
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2023-12-01
Series:Remote Sensing
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/2072-4292/15/24/5701
_version_ 1797379473267490816
author Marissa A. Alessi
Peter G. Chirico
Marco Millones
author_facet Marissa A. Alessi
Peter G. Chirico
Marco Millones
author_sort Marissa A. Alessi
collection DOAJ
description Challenges exist in monitoring artisanal and small-scale mining (ASM) activities, given their dynamic and often informal nature. ASM takes form through various techniques and scales, including riverine dredging, which often targets the abundant alluvial gold deposits in South America. Remote sensing offers a solution to improve data collection, regulation, and monitoring of the more mobile and elusive ASM activities and their impacts. Mapping ASM riverine dredges using Synthetic Aperture Radar (SAR) is one of the application areas least explored. Three semi-automated detection approaches using Sentinel-1 SAR are compared on their ability to identify dredges with minimal false positives. The methods are: (i) Search for Unidentified Maritime Objects (SUMO), an established method for large ocean ship detection; and two techniques specifically developed for riverine environments that are introduced in this paper: (ii) a local detection method; and (iii) a global threshold method. A visual interpretation of SAR data with the inclusion of optical high-resolution data are used to generate a validation dataset. Results show it is possible to semi-automatically detect riverine dredge using SAR and that a local detection method provides the best balance between sensitivity and precision and has the lowest risk of error. Future improvements may consider further automation, more discriminatory variables, and analyzing the methods in different environments and at higher spatial resolutions.
first_indexed 2024-03-08T20:23:43Z
format Article
id doaj.art-1602b929e20a41bfba4a46e5cb80c0ac
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2072-4292
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-08T20:23:43Z
publishDate 2023-12-01
publisher MDPI AG
record_format Article
series Remote Sensing
spelling doaj.art-1602b929e20a41bfba4a46e5cb80c0ac2023-12-22T14:39:04ZengMDPI AGRemote Sensing2072-42922023-12-011524570110.3390/rs15245701Artisanal Mining River Dredge Detection Using SAR: A Method ComparisonMarissa A. Alessi0Peter G. Chirico1Marco Millones2U.S. Geological Survey, Florence Bascom Geoscience Center, 12201 Sunrise Valley Drive, Reston, VA 20192, USAU.S. Geological Survey, Florence Bascom Geoscience Center, 12201 Sunrise Valley Drive, Reston, VA 20192, USADepartment of Geography, University of Mary Washington, 1301 College Avenue, Fredericksburg, VA 22401, USAChallenges exist in monitoring artisanal and small-scale mining (ASM) activities, given their dynamic and often informal nature. ASM takes form through various techniques and scales, including riverine dredging, which often targets the abundant alluvial gold deposits in South America. Remote sensing offers a solution to improve data collection, regulation, and monitoring of the more mobile and elusive ASM activities and their impacts. Mapping ASM riverine dredges using Synthetic Aperture Radar (SAR) is one of the application areas least explored. Three semi-automated detection approaches using Sentinel-1 SAR are compared on their ability to identify dredges with minimal false positives. The methods are: (i) Search for Unidentified Maritime Objects (SUMO), an established method for large ocean ship detection; and two techniques specifically developed for riverine environments that are introduced in this paper: (ii) a local detection method; and (iii) a global threshold method. A visual interpretation of SAR data with the inclusion of optical high-resolution data are used to generate a validation dataset. Results show it is possible to semi-automatically detect riverine dredge using SAR and that a local detection method provides the best balance between sensitivity and precision and has the lowest risk of error. Future improvements may consider further automation, more discriminatory variables, and analyzing the methods in different environments and at higher spatial resolutions.https://www.mdpi.com/2072-4292/15/24/5701Synthetic Aperture Radar (SAR)dredgesartisanal and small-scale mining (ASM)radar detectionremote sensinggold mining
spellingShingle Marissa A. Alessi
Peter G. Chirico
Marco Millones
Artisanal Mining River Dredge Detection Using SAR: A Method Comparison
Remote Sensing
Synthetic Aperture Radar (SAR)
dredges
artisanal and small-scale mining (ASM)
radar detection
remote sensing
gold mining
title Artisanal Mining River Dredge Detection Using SAR: A Method Comparison
title_full Artisanal Mining River Dredge Detection Using SAR: A Method Comparison
title_fullStr Artisanal Mining River Dredge Detection Using SAR: A Method Comparison
title_full_unstemmed Artisanal Mining River Dredge Detection Using SAR: A Method Comparison
title_short Artisanal Mining River Dredge Detection Using SAR: A Method Comparison
title_sort artisanal mining river dredge detection using sar a method comparison
topic Synthetic Aperture Radar (SAR)
dredges
artisanal and small-scale mining (ASM)
radar detection
remote sensing
gold mining
url https://www.mdpi.com/2072-4292/15/24/5701
work_keys_str_mv AT marissaaalessi artisanalminingriverdredgedetectionusingsaramethodcomparison
AT petergchirico artisanalminingriverdredgedetectionusingsaramethodcomparison
AT marcomillones artisanalminingriverdredgedetectionusingsaramethodcomparison