Effects of In Situ Co or Ni Doping on the Photoelectrochemical Performance of Hematite Nanorod Arrays

Co-doped and Ni-doped hematite (α-Fe<sub>2</sub>O<sub>3</sub>) nanorod arrays were prepared on fluorine-doped tin oxide (FTO) conductive glass via aqueous chemical growth, in which the doping and the formation of nanorods occurred simultaneously (i.e., in situ doping). These...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Feng Cheng, Xiuwei Li
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2020-05-01
Series:Applied Sciences
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/2076-3417/10/10/3567
_version_ 1797567340670353408
author Feng Cheng
Xiuwei Li
author_facet Feng Cheng
Xiuwei Li
author_sort Feng Cheng
collection DOAJ
description Co-doped and Ni-doped hematite (α-Fe<sub>2</sub>O<sub>3</sub>) nanorod arrays were prepared on fluorine-doped tin oxide (FTO) conductive glass via aqueous chemical growth, in which the doping and the formation of nanorods occurred simultaneously (i.e., in situ doping). These samples were characterized by X-ray diffraction (XRD), scanning electron microscopy (SEM), ultraviolet (UV)–visible spectrophotometry, linear sweep voltammetry and Mott–Schottky (M–S) measurement. Results showed that the introduction of 5% Co or Ni into α-Fe<sub>2</sub>O<sub>3</sub> (the molar ratio of dopant to Fe is 1:20) did not change its crystal phase, morphology, energy gap and flat band potential. Both the undoped and the doped α-Fe<sub>2</sub>O<sub>3</sub> showed a direct band gap of 2.24 eV, an indirect band gap of 1.85 eV, and a flat band potential of −0.22 V vs. saturated calomel electrode (SCE). At an applied potential of 0.2 V vs. SCE, the Co-doped and the Ni-doped α-Fe<sub>2</sub>O<sub>3</sub> exhibited a photocurrent of 1.28 mA/cm<sup>2</sup> and 0.79 mA/cm<sup>2</sup>, respectively, which were 2.1 times and 1.3 times that of the undoped α-Fe<sub>2</sub>O<sub>3</sub>. After the Co or Ni doping, the charge carrier concentration increased from 1.65 × 10<sup>25</sup> m<sup>−3</sup> to 3.74 × 10<sup>25</sup> m<sup>−3</sup> and 2.50 × 10<sup>25</sup> m<sup>−3</sup>, respectively. Therefore, the increase in the photocurrent of the doped α-Fe<sub>2</sub>O<sub>3</sub> was likely attributed to their enhanced conductivity.
first_indexed 2024-03-10T19:40:21Z
format Article
id doaj.art-16032ee3b839446585165b9756ba5947
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2076-3417
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-10T19:40:21Z
publishDate 2020-05-01
publisher MDPI AG
record_format Article
series Applied Sciences
spelling doaj.art-16032ee3b839446585165b9756ba59472023-11-20T01:13:36ZengMDPI AGApplied Sciences2076-34172020-05-011010356710.3390/app10103567Effects of In Situ Co or Ni Doping on the Photoelectrochemical Performance of Hematite Nanorod ArraysFeng Cheng0Xiuwei Li1School of Energy and Power Engineering, Nanjing University of Science and Technology, Nanjing 210094, ChinaSchool of Energy and Power Engineering, Nanjing University of Science and Technology, Nanjing 210094, ChinaCo-doped and Ni-doped hematite (α-Fe<sub>2</sub>O<sub>3</sub>) nanorod arrays were prepared on fluorine-doped tin oxide (FTO) conductive glass via aqueous chemical growth, in which the doping and the formation of nanorods occurred simultaneously (i.e., in situ doping). These samples were characterized by X-ray diffraction (XRD), scanning electron microscopy (SEM), ultraviolet (UV)–visible spectrophotometry, linear sweep voltammetry and Mott–Schottky (M–S) measurement. Results showed that the introduction of 5% Co or Ni into α-Fe<sub>2</sub>O<sub>3</sub> (the molar ratio of dopant to Fe is 1:20) did not change its crystal phase, morphology, energy gap and flat band potential. Both the undoped and the doped α-Fe<sub>2</sub>O<sub>3</sub> showed a direct band gap of 2.24 eV, an indirect band gap of 1.85 eV, and a flat band potential of −0.22 V vs. saturated calomel electrode (SCE). At an applied potential of 0.2 V vs. SCE, the Co-doped and the Ni-doped α-Fe<sub>2</sub>O<sub>3</sub> exhibited a photocurrent of 1.28 mA/cm<sup>2</sup> and 0.79 mA/cm<sup>2</sup>, respectively, which were 2.1 times and 1.3 times that of the undoped α-Fe<sub>2</sub>O<sub>3</sub>. After the Co or Ni doping, the charge carrier concentration increased from 1.65 × 10<sup>25</sup> m<sup>−3</sup> to 3.74 × 10<sup>25</sup> m<sup>−3</sup> and 2.50 × 10<sup>25</sup> m<sup>−3</sup>, respectively. Therefore, the increase in the photocurrent of the doped α-Fe<sub>2</sub>O<sub>3</sub> was likely attributed to their enhanced conductivity.https://www.mdpi.com/2076-3417/10/10/3567photoelectrochemical water splittinghydrogen productionaqueous chemical growthhematite nanorodin-situ doping
spellingShingle Feng Cheng
Xiuwei Li
Effects of In Situ Co or Ni Doping on the Photoelectrochemical Performance of Hematite Nanorod Arrays
Applied Sciences
photoelectrochemical water splitting
hydrogen production
aqueous chemical growth
hematite nanorod
in-situ doping
title Effects of In Situ Co or Ni Doping on the Photoelectrochemical Performance of Hematite Nanorod Arrays
title_full Effects of In Situ Co or Ni Doping on the Photoelectrochemical Performance of Hematite Nanorod Arrays
title_fullStr Effects of In Situ Co or Ni Doping on the Photoelectrochemical Performance of Hematite Nanorod Arrays
title_full_unstemmed Effects of In Situ Co or Ni Doping on the Photoelectrochemical Performance of Hematite Nanorod Arrays
title_short Effects of In Situ Co or Ni Doping on the Photoelectrochemical Performance of Hematite Nanorod Arrays
title_sort effects of in situ co or ni doping on the photoelectrochemical performance of hematite nanorod arrays
topic photoelectrochemical water splitting
hydrogen production
aqueous chemical growth
hematite nanorod
in-situ doping
url https://www.mdpi.com/2076-3417/10/10/3567
work_keys_str_mv AT fengcheng effectsofinsitucoornidopingonthephotoelectrochemicalperformanceofhematitenanorodarrays
AT xiuweili effectsofinsitucoornidopingonthephotoelectrochemicalperformanceofhematitenanorodarrays