Assessing Reliability of Recycled Water in Wicking Beds for Sustainable Urban Agriculture

Urban agriculture requires sustainable solutions to secure its water resources. A wicking bed (WB) is a simple system that could provide high yield and water use efficiency. This single trial glasshouse study compares the performance of a WB and surface irrigation (SI) system for growing tomatoes (&...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Niranjani P. K. Semananda, James D. Ward, Baden R. Myers
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2021-07-01
Series:Earth
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/2673-4834/2/3/28
_version_ 1797519604683112448
author Niranjani P. K. Semananda
James D. Ward
Baden R. Myers
author_facet Niranjani P. K. Semananda
James D. Ward
Baden R. Myers
author_sort Niranjani P. K. Semananda
collection DOAJ
description Urban agriculture requires sustainable solutions to secure its water resources. A wicking bed (WB) is a simple system that could provide high yield and water use efficiency. This single trial glasshouse study compares the performance of a WB and surface irrigation (SI) system for growing tomatoes (<i>Solanum lycopersicum</i> L.) using fresh (FW) and recycled water (RW). The performance of both treatments was compared when irrigating 2 days per week and for two environmental conditions (indoor and outdoor). In addition, the reliability of using FW and RW at a 7-day irrigation interval was studied for WBs alone. Results showed that the irrigation water use efficiency (kg/m<sup>3</sup>) and the yield (kg/plant) are significantly different only between WB (FW) and SI (RW) considering all conditions. The accumulation of salts and the sodium absorption ratio (SAR) were high in the surface layer of WBs compared to SI. This indicates that the use of RW affects the level of salinity and sodicity in soil, which in turn may decrease the yield. However, WBs perform similar to, if not better than, SI with FW. The WBs show the advantage of reducing the leachate of nutrients into groundwater, compared to SI systems. Further research into irrigation and nutrient management in WBs to reduce the effect of salinity at the surface is recommended to increase the efficiency of the system.
first_indexed 2024-03-10T07:45:09Z
format Article
id doaj.art-162124ab0132495eba49a43bdaa1559c
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2673-4834
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-10T07:45:09Z
publishDate 2021-07-01
publisher MDPI AG
record_format Article
series Earth
spelling doaj.art-162124ab0132495eba49a43bdaa1559c2023-11-22T12:43:33ZengMDPI AGEarth2673-48342021-07-012346848410.3390/earth2030028Assessing Reliability of Recycled Water in Wicking Beds for Sustainable Urban AgricultureNiranjani P. K. Semananda0James D. Ward1Baden R. Myers2UniSA STEM, University of South Australia, Mawson Lakes, Adelaide 5095, AustraliaUniSA STEM, University of South Australia, Mawson Lakes, Adelaide 5095, AustraliaUniSA STEM, University of South Australia, Mawson Lakes, Adelaide 5095, AustraliaUrban agriculture requires sustainable solutions to secure its water resources. A wicking bed (WB) is a simple system that could provide high yield and water use efficiency. This single trial glasshouse study compares the performance of a WB and surface irrigation (SI) system for growing tomatoes (<i>Solanum lycopersicum</i> L.) using fresh (FW) and recycled water (RW). The performance of both treatments was compared when irrigating 2 days per week and for two environmental conditions (indoor and outdoor). In addition, the reliability of using FW and RW at a 7-day irrigation interval was studied for WBs alone. Results showed that the irrigation water use efficiency (kg/m<sup>3</sup>) and the yield (kg/plant) are significantly different only between WB (FW) and SI (RW) considering all conditions. The accumulation of salts and the sodium absorption ratio (SAR) were high in the surface layer of WBs compared to SI. This indicates that the use of RW affects the level of salinity and sodicity in soil, which in turn may decrease the yield. However, WBs perform similar to, if not better than, SI with FW. The WBs show the advantage of reducing the leachate of nutrients into groundwater, compared to SI systems. Further research into irrigation and nutrient management in WBs to reduce the effect of salinity at the surface is recommended to increase the efficiency of the system.https://www.mdpi.com/2673-4834/2/3/28irrigationsalinityurban agriculturewicking bedwater use efficiencyyield
spellingShingle Niranjani P. K. Semananda
James D. Ward
Baden R. Myers
Assessing Reliability of Recycled Water in Wicking Beds for Sustainable Urban Agriculture
Earth
irrigation
salinity
urban agriculture
wicking bed
water use efficiency
yield
title Assessing Reliability of Recycled Water in Wicking Beds for Sustainable Urban Agriculture
title_full Assessing Reliability of Recycled Water in Wicking Beds for Sustainable Urban Agriculture
title_fullStr Assessing Reliability of Recycled Water in Wicking Beds for Sustainable Urban Agriculture
title_full_unstemmed Assessing Reliability of Recycled Water in Wicking Beds for Sustainable Urban Agriculture
title_short Assessing Reliability of Recycled Water in Wicking Beds for Sustainable Urban Agriculture
title_sort assessing reliability of recycled water in wicking beds for sustainable urban agriculture
topic irrigation
salinity
urban agriculture
wicking bed
water use efficiency
yield
url https://www.mdpi.com/2673-4834/2/3/28
work_keys_str_mv AT niranjanipksemananda assessingreliabilityofrecycledwaterinwickingbedsforsustainableurbanagriculture
AT jamesdward assessingreliabilityofrecycledwaterinwickingbedsforsustainableurbanagriculture
AT badenrmyers assessingreliabilityofrecycledwaterinwickingbedsforsustainableurbanagriculture