A Comparative Study and Analysis of Layered-Beam and Single-Beam Metamaterial Structures: Transmissibility Bandgap Development

Recently, layered-beam metamaterial structures have been gaining popularity in a variety of engineering applications including energy harvesting and vibration isolation. While both single-beam metamaterial structures and layered-beam metamaterial structures are capable of generating bandgaps, it is...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Winner Anigbogu, Hamzeh Bardaweel
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2022-07-01
Series:Applied Sciences
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/2076-3417/12/15/7550
_version_ 1827626069450031104
author Winner Anigbogu
Hamzeh Bardaweel
author_facet Winner Anigbogu
Hamzeh Bardaweel
author_sort Winner Anigbogu
collection DOAJ
description Recently, layered-beam metamaterial structures have been gaining popularity in a variety of engineering applications including energy harvesting and vibration isolation. While both single-beam metamaterial structures and layered-beam metamaterial structures are capable of generating bandgaps, it is important to understand the limitations of each type of metamaterial structure in order to make informed design decisions. In this article, a comparative study of bandgap development in single-beam metamaterial structures and layered-beam metamaterial structures is presented. The results show that for the single-beam metamaterial structure, with equally spaced local resonator designs, only one significant bandgap is developed at approximately 300–415 Hz. This bandgap occurs near the resonant frequency of the local resonators, i.e., 309 Hz. The results also show that when the spacing and the design of the local resonators are desired to remain fixed, layering the horizontal beams offers a significant pathway for both lowering the bandgap and developing additional bandgaps. The double-layered beam-type metamaterial structure studied in this work generates two bandgaps at approximately 238–275 Hz and 298–410 Hz. When the goal is to keep the number of local resonators per beam constant, increasing the length of the unit cells offers an alternative technique for lowering the bandgaps.
first_indexed 2024-03-09T12:48:42Z
format Article
id doaj.art-163d467761ee4fa483e8e9e33633dd82
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2076-3417
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-09T12:48:42Z
publishDate 2022-07-01
publisher MDPI AG
record_format Article
series Applied Sciences
spelling doaj.art-163d467761ee4fa483e8e9e33633dd822023-11-30T22:09:29ZengMDPI AGApplied Sciences2076-34172022-07-011215755010.3390/app12157550A Comparative Study and Analysis of Layered-Beam and Single-Beam Metamaterial Structures: Transmissibility Bandgap DevelopmentWinner Anigbogu0Hamzeh Bardaweel1Institute for Micromanufacturing, College of Engineering and Science, Louisiana Tech University, Ruston, LA 71272, USAInstitute for Micromanufacturing, College of Engineering and Science, Louisiana Tech University, Ruston, LA 71272, USARecently, layered-beam metamaterial structures have been gaining popularity in a variety of engineering applications including energy harvesting and vibration isolation. While both single-beam metamaterial structures and layered-beam metamaterial structures are capable of generating bandgaps, it is important to understand the limitations of each type of metamaterial structure in order to make informed design decisions. In this article, a comparative study of bandgap development in single-beam metamaterial structures and layered-beam metamaterial structures is presented. The results show that for the single-beam metamaterial structure, with equally spaced local resonator designs, only one significant bandgap is developed at approximately 300–415 Hz. This bandgap occurs near the resonant frequency of the local resonators, i.e., 309 Hz. The results also show that when the spacing and the design of the local resonators are desired to remain fixed, layering the horizontal beams offers a significant pathway for both lowering the bandgap and developing additional bandgaps. The double-layered beam-type metamaterial structure studied in this work generates two bandgaps at approximately 238–275 Hz and 298–410 Hz. When the goal is to keep the number of local resonators per beam constant, increasing the length of the unit cells offers an alternative technique for lowering the bandgaps.https://www.mdpi.com/2076-3417/12/15/7550layered-beam metamateriallocal resonatorstransmissibility bandgapssingle-beam metamaterialsvibration isolation
spellingShingle Winner Anigbogu
Hamzeh Bardaweel
A Comparative Study and Analysis of Layered-Beam and Single-Beam Metamaterial Structures: Transmissibility Bandgap Development
Applied Sciences
layered-beam metamaterial
local resonators
transmissibility bandgaps
single-beam metamaterials
vibration isolation
title A Comparative Study and Analysis of Layered-Beam and Single-Beam Metamaterial Structures: Transmissibility Bandgap Development
title_full A Comparative Study and Analysis of Layered-Beam and Single-Beam Metamaterial Structures: Transmissibility Bandgap Development
title_fullStr A Comparative Study and Analysis of Layered-Beam and Single-Beam Metamaterial Structures: Transmissibility Bandgap Development
title_full_unstemmed A Comparative Study and Analysis of Layered-Beam and Single-Beam Metamaterial Structures: Transmissibility Bandgap Development
title_short A Comparative Study and Analysis of Layered-Beam and Single-Beam Metamaterial Structures: Transmissibility Bandgap Development
title_sort comparative study and analysis of layered beam and single beam metamaterial structures transmissibility bandgap development
topic layered-beam metamaterial
local resonators
transmissibility bandgaps
single-beam metamaterials
vibration isolation
url https://www.mdpi.com/2076-3417/12/15/7550
work_keys_str_mv AT winneranigbogu acomparativestudyandanalysisoflayeredbeamandsinglebeammetamaterialstructurestransmissibilitybandgapdevelopment
AT hamzehbardaweel acomparativestudyandanalysisoflayeredbeamandsinglebeammetamaterialstructurestransmissibilitybandgapdevelopment
AT winneranigbogu comparativestudyandanalysisoflayeredbeamandsinglebeammetamaterialstructurestransmissibilitybandgapdevelopment
AT hamzehbardaweel comparativestudyandanalysisoflayeredbeamandsinglebeammetamaterialstructurestransmissibilitybandgapdevelopment