Lessons learned from implementation of a national hotline for Ebola virus disease emergency preparedness in South Sudan
Abstract Background The world’s second largest Ebola outbreak occurred in the Democratic Republic of Congo from 2018 to 2020. At the time, risk of cross-border spread into South Sudan was very high. Thus, the South Sudan Ministry of Health scaled up Ebola preparedness activities in August 2018, incl...
Main Authors: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
BMC
2021-04-01
|
Series: | Conflict and Health |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://doi.org/10.1186/s13031-021-00360-x |
_version_ | 1818726226329600000 |
---|---|
author | Velma K. Lopez Sharmila Shetty Angelo Thon Kouch Matthew Tut Khol Richard Lako Alexandre Bili Anyang David Ayuen Agnes Jukudu Ajak Ater Kug Atem David Mayen Emmanuel Nyawel Kibebu Berta Olushayo Olu Kevin Clarke Sudhir Bunga |
author_facet | Velma K. Lopez Sharmila Shetty Angelo Thon Kouch Matthew Tut Khol Richard Lako Alexandre Bili Anyang David Ayuen Agnes Jukudu Ajak Ater Kug Atem David Mayen Emmanuel Nyawel Kibebu Berta Olushayo Olu Kevin Clarke Sudhir Bunga |
author_sort | Velma K. Lopez |
collection | DOAJ |
description | Abstract Background The world’s second largest Ebola outbreak occurred in the Democratic Republic of Congo from 2018 to 2020. At the time, risk of cross-border spread into South Sudan was very high. Thus, the South Sudan Ministry of Health scaled up Ebola preparedness activities in August 2018, including implementation of a 24-h, toll-free Ebola virus disease (EVD) hotline. The primary purpose was the hotline was to receive EVD alerts and the secondary goal was to provide evidence-based EVD messages to the public. Methods To assess whether the hotline augmented Ebola preparedness activities in a protracted humanitarian emergency context, we reviewed 22 weeks of call logs from January to June 2019. Counts and percentages were calculated for all available data. Results The hotline received 2114 calls during the analysis period, and an additional 1835 missed calls were documented. Callers used the hotline throughout 24-h of the day and were most often men and individuals living in Jubek state, where the national capital is located. The leading reasons for calling were to learn more about EVD (68%) or to report clinical signs or symptoms (16%). Common EVD-related questions included EVD signs and symptoms, transmission, and prevention. Only one call was documented as an EVD alert, and there was no documentation of reported symptoms or whether the person met the EVD case definition. Conclusions Basic surveillance information was not collected from callers. To trigger effective outbreak investigation from hotline calls, the hotline should capture who is reporting and from where, symptoms and travel history, and whether this information should be further investigated. Electronic data capture will enhance data quality and availability of information for review. Additionally, the magnitude of missed calls presents a major challenge. When calls are answered, there is potential to provide health communication, so risk communication needs should be considered. However, prior to hotline implementation, governments should critically assess whether their hotline would yield actionable data and if other data sources for surveillance or community concerns are available. |
first_indexed | 2024-12-17T21:54:50Z |
format | Article |
id | doaj.art-16402660668743f3babc192bd0e197c5 |
institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
issn | 1752-1505 |
language | English |
last_indexed | 2024-12-17T21:54:50Z |
publishDate | 2021-04-01 |
publisher | BMC |
record_format | Article |
series | Conflict and Health |
spelling | doaj.art-16402660668743f3babc192bd0e197c52022-12-21T21:31:08ZengBMCConflict and Health1752-15052021-04-011511710.1186/s13031-021-00360-xLessons learned from implementation of a national hotline for Ebola virus disease emergency preparedness in South SudanVelma K. Lopez0Sharmila Shetty1Angelo Thon Kouch2Matthew Tut Khol3Richard Lako4Alexandre Bili5Anyang David Ayuen6Agnes Jukudu7Ajak Ater Kug8Atem David Mayen9Emmanuel Nyawel10Kibebu Berta11Olushayo Olu12Kevin Clarke13Sudhir Bunga14Division of Global Health Protection, Center for Global Health, CDCDivision of Global Health Protection, Center for Global Health, CDCMinistry of HealthMinistry of HealthMinistry of HealthMinistry of HealthMinistry of HealthMinistry of HealthMinistry of HealthMinistry of HealthMinistry of HealthWorld Health OrganizationWorld Health OrganizationDivision of Global Health Protection, Center for Global Health, CDCDivision of Global HIV and TB, Center for Global Health, CDCAbstract Background The world’s second largest Ebola outbreak occurred in the Democratic Republic of Congo from 2018 to 2020. At the time, risk of cross-border spread into South Sudan was very high. Thus, the South Sudan Ministry of Health scaled up Ebola preparedness activities in August 2018, including implementation of a 24-h, toll-free Ebola virus disease (EVD) hotline. The primary purpose was the hotline was to receive EVD alerts and the secondary goal was to provide evidence-based EVD messages to the public. Methods To assess whether the hotline augmented Ebola preparedness activities in a protracted humanitarian emergency context, we reviewed 22 weeks of call logs from January to June 2019. Counts and percentages were calculated for all available data. Results The hotline received 2114 calls during the analysis period, and an additional 1835 missed calls were documented. Callers used the hotline throughout 24-h of the day and were most often men and individuals living in Jubek state, where the national capital is located. The leading reasons for calling were to learn more about EVD (68%) or to report clinical signs or symptoms (16%). Common EVD-related questions included EVD signs and symptoms, transmission, and prevention. Only one call was documented as an EVD alert, and there was no documentation of reported symptoms or whether the person met the EVD case definition. Conclusions Basic surveillance information was not collected from callers. To trigger effective outbreak investigation from hotline calls, the hotline should capture who is reporting and from where, symptoms and travel history, and whether this information should be further investigated. Electronic data capture will enhance data quality and availability of information for review. Additionally, the magnitude of missed calls presents a major challenge. When calls are answered, there is potential to provide health communication, so risk communication needs should be considered. However, prior to hotline implementation, governments should critically assess whether their hotline would yield actionable data and if other data sources for surveillance or community concerns are available.https://doi.org/10.1186/s13031-021-00360-xEmergency preparednessEbolaHotline |
spellingShingle | Velma K. Lopez Sharmila Shetty Angelo Thon Kouch Matthew Tut Khol Richard Lako Alexandre Bili Anyang David Ayuen Agnes Jukudu Ajak Ater Kug Atem David Mayen Emmanuel Nyawel Kibebu Berta Olushayo Olu Kevin Clarke Sudhir Bunga Lessons learned from implementation of a national hotline for Ebola virus disease emergency preparedness in South Sudan Conflict and Health Emergency preparedness Ebola Hotline |
title | Lessons learned from implementation of a national hotline for Ebola virus disease emergency preparedness in South Sudan |
title_full | Lessons learned from implementation of a national hotline for Ebola virus disease emergency preparedness in South Sudan |
title_fullStr | Lessons learned from implementation of a national hotline for Ebola virus disease emergency preparedness in South Sudan |
title_full_unstemmed | Lessons learned from implementation of a national hotline for Ebola virus disease emergency preparedness in South Sudan |
title_short | Lessons learned from implementation of a national hotline for Ebola virus disease emergency preparedness in South Sudan |
title_sort | lessons learned from implementation of a national hotline for ebola virus disease emergency preparedness in south sudan |
topic | Emergency preparedness Ebola Hotline |
url | https://doi.org/10.1186/s13031-021-00360-x |
work_keys_str_mv | AT velmaklopez lessonslearnedfromimplementationofanationalhotlineforebolavirusdiseaseemergencypreparednessinsouthsudan AT sharmilashetty lessonslearnedfromimplementationofanationalhotlineforebolavirusdiseaseemergencypreparednessinsouthsudan AT angelothonkouch lessonslearnedfromimplementationofanationalhotlineforebolavirusdiseaseemergencypreparednessinsouthsudan AT matthewtutkhol lessonslearnedfromimplementationofanationalhotlineforebolavirusdiseaseemergencypreparednessinsouthsudan AT richardlako lessonslearnedfromimplementationofanationalhotlineforebolavirusdiseaseemergencypreparednessinsouthsudan AT alexandrebili lessonslearnedfromimplementationofanationalhotlineforebolavirusdiseaseemergencypreparednessinsouthsudan AT anyangdavidayuen lessonslearnedfromimplementationofanationalhotlineforebolavirusdiseaseemergencypreparednessinsouthsudan AT agnesjukudu lessonslearnedfromimplementationofanationalhotlineforebolavirusdiseaseemergencypreparednessinsouthsudan AT ajakaterkug lessonslearnedfromimplementationofanationalhotlineforebolavirusdiseaseemergencypreparednessinsouthsudan AT atemdavidmayen lessonslearnedfromimplementationofanationalhotlineforebolavirusdiseaseemergencypreparednessinsouthsudan AT emmanuelnyawel lessonslearnedfromimplementationofanationalhotlineforebolavirusdiseaseemergencypreparednessinsouthsudan AT kibebuberta lessonslearnedfromimplementationofanationalhotlineforebolavirusdiseaseemergencypreparednessinsouthsudan AT olushayoolu lessonslearnedfromimplementationofanationalhotlineforebolavirusdiseaseemergencypreparednessinsouthsudan AT kevinclarke lessonslearnedfromimplementationofanationalhotlineforebolavirusdiseaseemergencypreparednessinsouthsudan AT sudhirbunga lessonslearnedfromimplementationofanationalhotlineforebolavirusdiseaseemergencypreparednessinsouthsudan |