The mental health of NHS staff during the COVID-19 pandemic: two-wave Scottish cohort study

Background Health and social care workers (HSCWs) are at risk of experiencing adverse mental health outcomes (e.g. higher levels of anxiety and depression) because of the COVID-19 pandemic. This can have a detrimental effect on quality of care, the national response to the pandemic and its aftermath...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Johannes H. De Kock, Helen Ann Latham, Richard G. Cowden, Breda Cullen, Katia Narzisi, Shaun Jerdan, Sarah-Anne Muñoz, Stephen J. Leslie, Neil McNamara, Adam Boggon, Roger W. Humphry
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Cambridge University Press 2022-01-01
Series:BJPsych Open
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S2056472421010796/type/journal_article
_version_ 1827995593160523776
author Johannes H. De Kock
Helen Ann Latham
Richard G. Cowden
Breda Cullen
Katia Narzisi
Shaun Jerdan
Sarah-Anne Muñoz
Stephen J. Leslie
Neil McNamara
Adam Boggon
Roger W. Humphry
author_facet Johannes H. De Kock
Helen Ann Latham
Richard G. Cowden
Breda Cullen
Katia Narzisi
Shaun Jerdan
Sarah-Anne Muñoz
Stephen J. Leslie
Neil McNamara
Adam Boggon
Roger W. Humphry
author_sort Johannes H. De Kock
collection DOAJ
description Background Health and social care workers (HSCWs) are at risk of experiencing adverse mental health outcomes (e.g. higher levels of anxiety and depression) because of the COVID-19 pandemic. This can have a detrimental effect on quality of care, the national response to the pandemic and its aftermath. Aims A longitudinal design provided follow-up evidence on the mental health (changes in prevalence of disease over time) of NHS staff working at a remote health board in Scotland during the COVID-19 pandemic, and investigated the determinants of mental health outcomes over time. Method A two-wave longitudinal study was conducted from July to September 2020. Participants self-reported levels of depression (Patient Health Questionnaire-9), anxiety (Generalised Anxiety Disorder-7) and mental well-being (Warwick-Edinburgh Mental Well-being Scale) at baseline and 1.5 months later. Results The analytic sample of 169 participants, working in community (43%) and hospital (44%) settings, reported substantial levels of depression and anxiety, and low mental well-being at baseline (depression, 30.8%; anxiety, 20.1%; well-being, 31.9%). Although mental health remained mostly constant over time, the proportion of participants meeting the threshold for anxiety increased to 27.2% at follow-up. Multivariable modelling indicated that working with, and disruption because of, COVID-19 were associated with adverse mental health changes over time. Conclusions HSCWs working in a remote area with low COVID-19 prevalence reported substantial levels of anxiety and depression, similar to those working in areas with high COVID-19 prevalence. Efforts to support HSCW mental health must remain a priority, and should minimise the adverse effects of working with, and disruption caused by, the COVID-19 pandemic.
first_indexed 2024-04-10T04:58:47Z
format Article
id doaj.art-164374b6d92d478389043274255feef5
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2056-4724
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-10T04:58:47Z
publishDate 2022-01-01
publisher Cambridge University Press
record_format Article
series BJPsych Open
spelling doaj.art-164374b6d92d478389043274255feef52023-03-09T12:29:18ZengCambridge University PressBJPsych Open2056-47242022-01-01810.1192/bjo.2021.1079The mental health of NHS staff during the COVID-19 pandemic: two-wave Scottish cohort studyJohannes H. De Kock0https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2468-5572Helen Ann Latham1Richard G. Cowden2Breda Cullen3Katia Narzisi4https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9869-0799Shaun Jerdan5Sarah-Anne Muñoz6Stephen J. Leslie7Neil McNamara8Adam Boggon9Roger W. Humphry10Institute for Health Research and Innovation, University of the Highlands and Islands; and Department of Clinical Psychology, New Craigs Psychiatric Hospital, NHS Highland, UKNairn Healthcare Group, NHS Highland, UKInstitute for Quantitative Social Science, Harvard University, USAInstitute of Health & Wellbeing, University of Glasgow, UKInstitute for Health Research and Innovation, University of the Highlands and Islands, UKInstitute for Health Research and Innovation, University of the Highlands and Islands, UKInstitute for Health Research and Innovation, University of the Highlands and Islands, UKInstitute for Health Research and Innovation, University of the Highlands and Islands; and Cardiac Unit, Raigmore Hospital, NHS Highland, UKDepartment of Psychiatry, New Craigs Psychiatric Hospital, NHS Highland, UKUniversity College London Medical School, Royal Free Hospital, UKEpidemiology Research Unit, Scottish Rural College, UKBackground Health and social care workers (HSCWs) are at risk of experiencing adverse mental health outcomes (e.g. higher levels of anxiety and depression) because of the COVID-19 pandemic. This can have a detrimental effect on quality of care, the national response to the pandemic and its aftermath. Aims A longitudinal design provided follow-up evidence on the mental health (changes in prevalence of disease over time) of NHS staff working at a remote health board in Scotland during the COVID-19 pandemic, and investigated the determinants of mental health outcomes over time. Method A two-wave longitudinal study was conducted from July to September 2020. Participants self-reported levels of depression (Patient Health Questionnaire-9), anxiety (Generalised Anxiety Disorder-7) and mental well-being (Warwick-Edinburgh Mental Well-being Scale) at baseline and 1.5 months later. Results The analytic sample of 169 participants, working in community (43%) and hospital (44%) settings, reported substantial levels of depression and anxiety, and low mental well-being at baseline (depression, 30.8%; anxiety, 20.1%; well-being, 31.9%). Although mental health remained mostly constant over time, the proportion of participants meeting the threshold for anxiety increased to 27.2% at follow-up. Multivariable modelling indicated that working with, and disruption because of, COVID-19 were associated with adverse mental health changes over time. Conclusions HSCWs working in a remote area with low COVID-19 prevalence reported substantial levels of anxiety and depression, similar to those working in areas with high COVID-19 prevalence. Efforts to support HSCW mental health must remain a priority, and should minimise the adverse effects of working with, and disruption caused by, the COVID-19 pandemic. https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S2056472421010796/type/journal_articleMental healthstaffNational Health ServiceCOVID-19risk factors
spellingShingle Johannes H. De Kock
Helen Ann Latham
Richard G. Cowden
Breda Cullen
Katia Narzisi
Shaun Jerdan
Sarah-Anne Muñoz
Stephen J. Leslie
Neil McNamara
Adam Boggon
Roger W. Humphry
The mental health of NHS staff during the COVID-19 pandemic: two-wave Scottish cohort study
BJPsych Open
Mental health
staff
National Health Service
COVID-19
risk factors
title The mental health of NHS staff during the COVID-19 pandemic: two-wave Scottish cohort study
title_full The mental health of NHS staff during the COVID-19 pandemic: two-wave Scottish cohort study
title_fullStr The mental health of NHS staff during the COVID-19 pandemic: two-wave Scottish cohort study
title_full_unstemmed The mental health of NHS staff during the COVID-19 pandemic: two-wave Scottish cohort study
title_short The mental health of NHS staff during the COVID-19 pandemic: two-wave Scottish cohort study
title_sort mental health of nhs staff during the covid 19 pandemic two wave scottish cohort study
topic Mental health
staff
National Health Service
COVID-19
risk factors
url https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S2056472421010796/type/journal_article
work_keys_str_mv AT johanneshdekock thementalhealthofnhsstaffduringthecovid19pandemictwowavescottishcohortstudy
AT helenannlatham thementalhealthofnhsstaffduringthecovid19pandemictwowavescottishcohortstudy
AT richardgcowden thementalhealthofnhsstaffduringthecovid19pandemictwowavescottishcohortstudy
AT bredacullen thementalhealthofnhsstaffduringthecovid19pandemictwowavescottishcohortstudy
AT katianarzisi thementalhealthofnhsstaffduringthecovid19pandemictwowavescottishcohortstudy
AT shaunjerdan thementalhealthofnhsstaffduringthecovid19pandemictwowavescottishcohortstudy
AT sarahannemunoz thementalhealthofnhsstaffduringthecovid19pandemictwowavescottishcohortstudy
AT stephenjleslie thementalhealthofnhsstaffduringthecovid19pandemictwowavescottishcohortstudy
AT neilmcnamara thementalhealthofnhsstaffduringthecovid19pandemictwowavescottishcohortstudy
AT adamboggon thementalhealthofnhsstaffduringthecovid19pandemictwowavescottishcohortstudy
AT rogerwhumphry thementalhealthofnhsstaffduringthecovid19pandemictwowavescottishcohortstudy
AT johanneshdekock mentalhealthofnhsstaffduringthecovid19pandemictwowavescottishcohortstudy
AT helenannlatham mentalhealthofnhsstaffduringthecovid19pandemictwowavescottishcohortstudy
AT richardgcowden mentalhealthofnhsstaffduringthecovid19pandemictwowavescottishcohortstudy
AT bredacullen mentalhealthofnhsstaffduringthecovid19pandemictwowavescottishcohortstudy
AT katianarzisi mentalhealthofnhsstaffduringthecovid19pandemictwowavescottishcohortstudy
AT shaunjerdan mentalhealthofnhsstaffduringthecovid19pandemictwowavescottishcohortstudy
AT sarahannemunoz mentalhealthofnhsstaffduringthecovid19pandemictwowavescottishcohortstudy
AT stephenjleslie mentalhealthofnhsstaffduringthecovid19pandemictwowavescottishcohortstudy
AT neilmcnamara mentalhealthofnhsstaffduringthecovid19pandemictwowavescottishcohortstudy
AT adamboggon mentalhealthofnhsstaffduringthecovid19pandemictwowavescottishcohortstudy
AT rogerwhumphry mentalhealthofnhsstaffduringthecovid19pandemictwowavescottishcohortstudy