Open partial nephrectomy in the robotic era

Objective: To evaluate the contemporary role of open partial nephrectomy at a referral high-volume kidney cancer Center, presenting our step-by-step technique of open tumor enucleation. Patient and Surgical Procedure: We queried our prospectively database to select patients undergoing open PN for no...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Riccardo Campi, Alessio Pecoraro, Anna Rivetti, Maria Lucia Gallo, Mauro Gacci, Graziano Vignolini, Sergio Serni
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Elsevier 2022-06-01
Series:Urology Video Journal
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2590089722000263
_version_ 1818211739624275968
author Riccardo Campi
Alessio Pecoraro
Anna Rivetti
Maria Lucia Gallo
Mauro Gacci
Graziano Vignolini
Sergio Serni
author_facet Riccardo Campi
Alessio Pecoraro
Anna Rivetti
Maria Lucia Gallo
Mauro Gacci
Graziano Vignolini
Sergio Serni
author_sort Riccardo Campi
collection DOAJ
description Objective: To evaluate the contemporary role of open partial nephrectomy at a referral high-volume kidney cancer Center, presenting our step-by-step technique of open tumor enucleation. Patient and Surgical Procedure: We queried our prospectively database to select patients undergoing open PN for non-metastatic renal masses at our Center between January 2017 and December 2020. Preoperative patients’ and tumors’ characteristics were recorded. Overall, open PN was performed by a single highly experienced surgeon (S.S.) (> 500 RAPN; > 500 open PN) following established principles. In this video we present a case of a 69-year-old patient with a highly complex (PADUA 10), cT2N0M0, predominantly endophytic 8 cm renal mass in a congenital right solitary kidney (preoperative eGFR 73 ml/min/1.73 m2), with no previous abdominal surgery, undergoing open PN. Results: Overall, of 428 patients treated with PN at our Center in the study period, 422 (98.6%) underwent RAPN while 6 (1.4%) open PN. There were no intraoperative adverse events. Perioperative major (Clavien-Dindo grade > 3) complications were recorded in two patients. In the case shown in the video, the overall operative time was 240 min, while warm ischemia time 35 min. The postoperative course was uneventful, and the patient was discharged on postoperative day (POD) 6 in good clinical conditions and with an eGFR of 53.7 ml/min/1.73 m2. The patient was then readmitted on POD 13 for an active bleeding from a small renal pseudoaneurysm detected by an angio-computed tomography scan. Therefore, the patient underwent super-selective embolization, and discharged four days later in good clinical conditions and with an eGFR of 49 ml/min/1.73 m2. Histopathological examination revealed a pT3a Nx ISUP grade 3 clear cell renal cell carcinoma, with negative surgical margins. Conclusions: While robotic approach has almost replaced open PN at referral high- volume Centers worldwide for localized renal masses, carefully selected patients may still benefit from an open approach.
first_indexed 2024-12-12T05:37:17Z
format Article
id doaj.art-1646aa42d9b540f0a4e9783f65779740
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2590-0897
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-12T05:37:17Z
publishDate 2022-06-01
publisher Elsevier
record_format Article
series Urology Video Journal
spelling doaj.art-1646aa42d9b540f0a4e9783f657797402022-12-22T00:36:05ZengElsevierUrology Video Journal2590-08972022-06-0114100149Open partial nephrectomy in the robotic eraRiccardo Campi0Alessio Pecoraro1Anna Rivetti2Maria Lucia Gallo3Mauro Gacci4Graziano Vignolini5Sergio Serni6Unit of Urological Robotic Surgery and Renal Transplantation, Careggi Hospital, University of Florence, Florence 50134, Italy; Department of Experimental and Clinical Medicine, University of Florence, Florence, Italy; Corresponding author at: Unit of Urological Robotic Surgery and Renal Transplantation, Careggi Hospital, University of Florence, Florence 50134, Italy.Unit of Urological Robotic Surgery and Renal Transplantation, Careggi Hospital, University of Florence, Florence 50134, ItalyUnit of Urological Robotic Surgery and Renal Transplantation, Careggi Hospital, University of Florence, Florence 50134, ItalyUnit of Urological Robotic Surgery and Renal Transplantation, Careggi Hospital, University of Florence, Florence 50134, ItalyUnit of Urological Robotic Surgery and Renal Transplantation, Careggi Hospital, University of Florence, Florence 50134, ItalyUnit of Urological Robotic Surgery and Renal Transplantation, Careggi Hospital, University of Florence, Florence 50134, ItalyUnit of Urological Robotic Surgery and Renal Transplantation, Careggi Hospital, University of Florence, Florence 50134, Italy; Department of Experimental and Clinical Medicine, University of Florence, Florence, ItalyObjective: To evaluate the contemporary role of open partial nephrectomy at a referral high-volume kidney cancer Center, presenting our step-by-step technique of open tumor enucleation. Patient and Surgical Procedure: We queried our prospectively database to select patients undergoing open PN for non-metastatic renal masses at our Center between January 2017 and December 2020. Preoperative patients’ and tumors’ characteristics were recorded. Overall, open PN was performed by a single highly experienced surgeon (S.S.) (> 500 RAPN; > 500 open PN) following established principles. In this video we present a case of a 69-year-old patient with a highly complex (PADUA 10), cT2N0M0, predominantly endophytic 8 cm renal mass in a congenital right solitary kidney (preoperative eGFR 73 ml/min/1.73 m2), with no previous abdominal surgery, undergoing open PN. Results: Overall, of 428 patients treated with PN at our Center in the study period, 422 (98.6%) underwent RAPN while 6 (1.4%) open PN. There were no intraoperative adverse events. Perioperative major (Clavien-Dindo grade > 3) complications were recorded in two patients. In the case shown in the video, the overall operative time was 240 min, while warm ischemia time 35 min. The postoperative course was uneventful, and the patient was discharged on postoperative day (POD) 6 in good clinical conditions and with an eGFR of 53.7 ml/min/1.73 m2. The patient was then readmitted on POD 13 for an active bleeding from a small renal pseudoaneurysm detected by an angio-computed tomography scan. Therefore, the patient underwent super-selective embolization, and discharged four days later in good clinical conditions and with an eGFR of 49 ml/min/1.73 m2. Histopathological examination revealed a pT3a Nx ISUP grade 3 clear cell renal cell carcinoma, with negative surgical margins. Conclusions: While robotic approach has almost replaced open PN at referral high- volume Centers worldwide for localized renal masses, carefully selected patients may still benefit from an open approach.http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2590089722000263Decision-makingOpen surgeryPartial nephrectomyRenal cell carcinomaRenal mass
spellingShingle Riccardo Campi
Alessio Pecoraro
Anna Rivetti
Maria Lucia Gallo
Mauro Gacci
Graziano Vignolini
Sergio Serni
Open partial nephrectomy in the robotic era
Urology Video Journal
Decision-making
Open surgery
Partial nephrectomy
Renal cell carcinoma
Renal mass
title Open partial nephrectomy in the robotic era
title_full Open partial nephrectomy in the robotic era
title_fullStr Open partial nephrectomy in the robotic era
title_full_unstemmed Open partial nephrectomy in the robotic era
title_short Open partial nephrectomy in the robotic era
title_sort open partial nephrectomy in the robotic era
topic Decision-making
Open surgery
Partial nephrectomy
Renal cell carcinoma
Renal mass
url http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2590089722000263
work_keys_str_mv AT riccardocampi openpartialnephrectomyintheroboticera
AT alessiopecoraro openpartialnephrectomyintheroboticera
AT annarivetti openpartialnephrectomyintheroboticera
AT marialuciagallo openpartialnephrectomyintheroboticera
AT maurogacci openpartialnephrectomyintheroboticera
AT grazianovignolini openpartialnephrectomyintheroboticera
AT sergioserni openpartialnephrectomyintheroboticera