Analysis of clinicopathological characteristics and prognostic factors of early‐stage human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)‐low breast cancer: Compared with HER2‐0 breast cancer

Abstract Purpose To investigate the clinicopathological characteristics and prognostic factors of early‐stage breast cancer (EBC) with human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)‐low expression. Methods The clinicopathological data and follow‐up information of EBC patients with HER2‐low and HER2...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Qian Wu, Fan Yang, YinHua Liu, Hong Zhang, Shuang Zhang, Ling Xin, Ling Xu
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wiley 2023-10-01
Series:Cancer Medicine
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1002/cam4.6571
_version_ 1827219719432699904
author Qian Wu
Fan Yang
YinHua Liu
Hong Zhang
Shuang Zhang
Ling Xin
Ling Xu
author_facet Qian Wu
Fan Yang
YinHua Liu
Hong Zhang
Shuang Zhang
Ling Xin
Ling Xu
author_sort Qian Wu
collection DOAJ
description Abstract Purpose To investigate the clinicopathological characteristics and prognostic factors of early‐stage breast cancer (EBC) with human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)‐low expression. Methods The clinicopathological data and follow‐up information of EBC patients with HER2‐low and HER2‐0 expression treated at the Breast Disease Center of Peking University First Hospital from January 2014 to December 2017 were analyzed. The prognosis between HER2‐low and HER2‐0 expression groups and with different hormone receptor (HR) expression were compared by statistics. Meanwhile, the expression of Ki67, androgen receptor (AR), TOPIIa, P53, PTEN, and CK5/6 were also analyzed with the HER2‐low expression and prognosis. Results Retrospectively analyzed 1253 cases of EBC, including 583 (46.5%) cases of HER2‐low breast cancer (BC) and 366 (29.2%) HER2‐0 BC cases. Among the HER2‐low BC patients, 487 (83.5%) were HR‐positive, while 96 (16.5%) were HR‐negative. Among the HER2‐0 BC patients, 265 (72.4%) were HR‐positive, while 101 (27.6%) were HR‐negative. Median follow‐up time was 53 months. The 5‐year disease‐free survival of HER2‐low BC patients was 90.2% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 87.2–93.1), and the 5‐year overall survival was 95.4% (95% CI: 93.3–97.6). Cox regression analysis showed that T stage, lymphovascular invasion, and/or perineural invasion were prognostic factors of HER2‐low BC patients. However, the 5‐year disease‐free survival and overall survival of patients in the HER2‐low and HER2‐0 groups were not significantly different in all patients, but a tendency of better prognosis in HER2‐low group was seen in HR‐negative tumors. Conclusion HER2‐low EBC patients accounted for 46.5% of the patient population. T stage, lymphovascular invasion, and/or perineural invasion were factors affecting the prognosis of BC patients with low HER2 expression. No significant difference in prognosis was noted between HER2‐low and HER2‐0 EBC patients. But in HR‐negative tumors, a tendency of better prognosis was seen in HER2‐low versus HER2‐0.
first_indexed 2024-03-11T17:00:01Z
format Article
id doaj.art-16669d3fd23b44b88c03cc8bc791282d
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2045-7634
language English
last_indexed 2025-03-21T15:55:16Z
publishDate 2023-10-01
publisher Wiley
record_format Article
series Cancer Medicine
spelling doaj.art-16669d3fd23b44b88c03cc8bc791282d2024-06-18T06:26:02ZengWileyCancer Medicine2045-76342023-10-011219195601957510.1002/cam4.6571Analysis of clinicopathological characteristics and prognostic factors of early‐stage human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)‐low breast cancer: Compared with HER2‐0 breast cancerQian Wu0Fan Yang1YinHua Liu2Hong Zhang3Shuang Zhang4Ling Xin5Ling Xu6Thyroid and Breast Surgery Peking University First Hospital Beijing ChinaThyroid and Breast Surgery Peking University First Hospital Beijing ChinaThyroid and Breast Surgery Peking University First Hospital Beijing ChinaDepartment of Pathology Peking University First Hospital Beijing ChinaDepartment of Pathology Peking University First Hospital Beijing ChinaThyroid and Breast Surgery Peking University First Hospital Beijing ChinaThyroid and Breast Surgery Peking University First Hospital Beijing ChinaAbstract Purpose To investigate the clinicopathological characteristics and prognostic factors of early‐stage breast cancer (EBC) with human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)‐low expression. Methods The clinicopathological data and follow‐up information of EBC patients with HER2‐low and HER2‐0 expression treated at the Breast Disease Center of Peking University First Hospital from January 2014 to December 2017 were analyzed. The prognosis between HER2‐low and HER2‐0 expression groups and with different hormone receptor (HR) expression were compared by statistics. Meanwhile, the expression of Ki67, androgen receptor (AR), TOPIIa, P53, PTEN, and CK5/6 were also analyzed with the HER2‐low expression and prognosis. Results Retrospectively analyzed 1253 cases of EBC, including 583 (46.5%) cases of HER2‐low breast cancer (BC) and 366 (29.2%) HER2‐0 BC cases. Among the HER2‐low BC patients, 487 (83.5%) were HR‐positive, while 96 (16.5%) were HR‐negative. Among the HER2‐0 BC patients, 265 (72.4%) were HR‐positive, while 101 (27.6%) were HR‐negative. Median follow‐up time was 53 months. The 5‐year disease‐free survival of HER2‐low BC patients was 90.2% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 87.2–93.1), and the 5‐year overall survival was 95.4% (95% CI: 93.3–97.6). Cox regression analysis showed that T stage, lymphovascular invasion, and/or perineural invasion were prognostic factors of HER2‐low BC patients. However, the 5‐year disease‐free survival and overall survival of patients in the HER2‐low and HER2‐0 groups were not significantly different in all patients, but a tendency of better prognosis in HER2‐low group was seen in HR‐negative tumors. Conclusion HER2‐low EBC patients accounted for 46.5% of the patient population. T stage, lymphovascular invasion, and/or perineural invasion were factors affecting the prognosis of BC patients with low HER2 expression. No significant difference in prognosis was noted between HER2‐low and HER2‐0 EBC patients. But in HR‐negative tumors, a tendency of better prognosis was seen in HER2‐low versus HER2‐0.https://doi.org/10.1002/cam4.6571breast cancerearly stageHER2‐lowprognosis
spellingShingle Qian Wu
Fan Yang
YinHua Liu
Hong Zhang
Shuang Zhang
Ling Xin
Ling Xu
Analysis of clinicopathological characteristics and prognostic factors of early‐stage human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)‐low breast cancer: Compared with HER2‐0 breast cancer
Cancer Medicine
breast cancer
early stage
HER2‐low
prognosis
title Analysis of clinicopathological characteristics and prognostic factors of early‐stage human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)‐low breast cancer: Compared with HER2‐0 breast cancer
title_full Analysis of clinicopathological characteristics and prognostic factors of early‐stage human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)‐low breast cancer: Compared with HER2‐0 breast cancer
title_fullStr Analysis of clinicopathological characteristics and prognostic factors of early‐stage human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)‐low breast cancer: Compared with HER2‐0 breast cancer
title_full_unstemmed Analysis of clinicopathological characteristics and prognostic factors of early‐stage human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)‐low breast cancer: Compared with HER2‐0 breast cancer
title_short Analysis of clinicopathological characteristics and prognostic factors of early‐stage human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)‐low breast cancer: Compared with HER2‐0 breast cancer
title_sort analysis of clinicopathological characteristics and prognostic factors of early stage human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 her2 low breast cancer compared with her2 0 breast cancer
topic breast cancer
early stage
HER2‐low
prognosis
url https://doi.org/10.1002/cam4.6571
work_keys_str_mv AT qianwu analysisofclinicopathologicalcharacteristicsandprognosticfactorsofearlystagehumanepidermalgrowthfactorreceptor2her2lowbreastcancercomparedwithher20breastcancer
AT fanyang analysisofclinicopathologicalcharacteristicsandprognosticfactorsofearlystagehumanepidermalgrowthfactorreceptor2her2lowbreastcancercomparedwithher20breastcancer
AT yinhualiu analysisofclinicopathologicalcharacteristicsandprognosticfactorsofearlystagehumanepidermalgrowthfactorreceptor2her2lowbreastcancercomparedwithher20breastcancer
AT hongzhang analysisofclinicopathologicalcharacteristicsandprognosticfactorsofearlystagehumanepidermalgrowthfactorreceptor2her2lowbreastcancercomparedwithher20breastcancer
AT shuangzhang analysisofclinicopathologicalcharacteristicsandprognosticfactorsofearlystagehumanepidermalgrowthfactorreceptor2her2lowbreastcancercomparedwithher20breastcancer
AT lingxin analysisofclinicopathologicalcharacteristicsandprognosticfactorsofearlystagehumanepidermalgrowthfactorreceptor2her2lowbreastcancercomparedwithher20breastcancer
AT lingxu analysisofclinicopathologicalcharacteristicsandprognosticfactorsofearlystagehumanepidermalgrowthfactorreceptor2her2lowbreastcancercomparedwithher20breastcancer