Evaluation approach on public‐private partnership (PPP) urban redevelopments

Urban redevelopments in recent years tend to follow a pragmatic market‐led partnership approach with involvement of both public and private sectors. However, it has been evidenced that this approach suffers from a number of deficiencies. These include over‐reliance on private investments which make...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Barbara Y.P. Leung, Eddie C.M. Hui
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Vilnius Gediminas Technical University 2005-03-01
Series:International Journal of Strategic Property Management
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.bme.vgtu.lt/index.php/IJSPM/article/view/7257
_version_ 1818563655614070784
author Barbara Y.P. Leung
Eddie C.M. Hui
author_facet Barbara Y.P. Leung
Eddie C.M. Hui
author_sort Barbara Y.P. Leung
collection DOAJ
description Urban redevelopments in recent years tend to follow a pragmatic market‐led partnership approach with involvement of both public and private sectors. However, it has been evidenced that this approach suffers from a number of deficiencies. These include over‐reliance on private investments which make the project vulnerable to financial risks and over‐emphases on creating a place of opportunity rather than improving the social environment in the deprived areas. This paper proposes an approach encompassing Cost‐Benefit Analysis (CBA) and Option Pricing concepts (OP) into urban renewal projects which is considered more appropriate for urban redevelopment appraisal. The approach is applied for appraising the bust‐boom saga of the London Docklands redevelopment to demonstrate the importance of the inclusion of social costs and benefits in the evaluation and the strategic value of operating options. Furthermore, key factors for an urban redevelopment project are also identified from the analyses which are considered crucial for the success of the project. Urbanistiniai pertvarkymai pastaraisiais metais dažniausiai vykdomi laikantis pragmatine rinka pagristos partnerystes nuostatos, būdingos tiek viešiesiems, tiek privatiems sektoriams. Tačiau buvo irodyta, kad šis būdas turi nemažai trūkumu. Tai susije su pernelyg dideliu pasitikejimu privačiomis investicijomis, del kuriu projektas susiduria su finansine rizika, bei pernelyg pabrežiamu galimybiu sukūrimu, o ne socialines aplinkos pagerinimu skurdžiuose kvartaluose. Šiame darbe siūloma i urbanistinius atnaujinimo projektus itraukti kaštu ir naudos analize (CBA) bei pasirinkčiu kainodaros (OP) metodika, kuri laikoma tinkamesne urbanistiniams pertvarkymams ivertinti. Ši metodika taikoma Londono doku pertvarkymams vertinti, norint parodyti socialiniu kaštu bei naudos itraukimo i vertinima svarba bei strategine valdymo pasirinkčiu verte. Be to, pagrindiniai veiksniai urbanistiniu pertvarkymu projekte taip pat nustatomi analizes, turinčios esmine itaka projekto sekmei, metodu. First Published Online: 18 Oct 2010
first_indexed 2024-12-14T01:19:14Z
format Article
id doaj.art-166d02c51aea4fb8ae85c01671a1d318
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1648-715X
1648-9179
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-14T01:19:14Z
publishDate 2005-03-01
publisher Vilnius Gediminas Technical University
record_format Article
series International Journal of Strategic Property Management
spelling doaj.art-166d02c51aea4fb8ae85c01671a1d3182022-12-21T23:22:28ZengVilnius Gediminas Technical UniversityInternational Journal of Strategic Property Management1648-715X1648-91792005-03-019110.3846/1648715X.2005.9637522Evaluation approach on public‐private partnership (PPP) urban redevelopmentsBarbara Y.P. Leung0Eddie C.M. Hui1Department of Building and Real Estate , The Hong Kong Polytechnic University , Hung Hom, Kowloon, Hong Kong, ChinaDepartment of Building and Real Estate , The Hong Kong Polytechnic University , Hung Hom, Kowloon, Hong Kong, ChinaUrban redevelopments in recent years tend to follow a pragmatic market‐led partnership approach with involvement of both public and private sectors. However, it has been evidenced that this approach suffers from a number of deficiencies. These include over‐reliance on private investments which make the project vulnerable to financial risks and over‐emphases on creating a place of opportunity rather than improving the social environment in the deprived areas. This paper proposes an approach encompassing Cost‐Benefit Analysis (CBA) and Option Pricing concepts (OP) into urban renewal projects which is considered more appropriate for urban redevelopment appraisal. The approach is applied for appraising the bust‐boom saga of the London Docklands redevelopment to demonstrate the importance of the inclusion of social costs and benefits in the evaluation and the strategic value of operating options. Furthermore, key factors for an urban redevelopment project are also identified from the analyses which are considered crucial for the success of the project. Urbanistiniai pertvarkymai pastaraisiais metais dažniausiai vykdomi laikantis pragmatine rinka pagristos partnerystes nuostatos, būdingos tiek viešiesiems, tiek privatiems sektoriams. Tačiau buvo irodyta, kad šis būdas turi nemažai trūkumu. Tai susije su pernelyg dideliu pasitikejimu privačiomis investicijomis, del kuriu projektas susiduria su finansine rizika, bei pernelyg pabrežiamu galimybiu sukūrimu, o ne socialines aplinkos pagerinimu skurdžiuose kvartaluose. Šiame darbe siūloma i urbanistinius atnaujinimo projektus itraukti kaštu ir naudos analize (CBA) bei pasirinkčiu kainodaros (OP) metodika, kuri laikoma tinkamesne urbanistiniams pertvarkymams ivertinti. Ši metodika taikoma Londono doku pertvarkymams vertinti, norint parodyti socialiniu kaštu bei naudos itraukimo i vertinima svarba bei strategine valdymo pasirinkčiu verte. Be to, pagrindiniai veiksniai urbanistiniu pertvarkymu projekte taip pat nustatomi analizes, turinčios esmine itaka projekto sekmei, metodu. First Published Online: 18 Oct 2010https://www.bme.vgtu.lt/index.php/IJSPM/article/view/7257Public‐Private PartnershipCost‐Benefit AnalysisOption PricingUrban redevelopmentLondon Docklands
spellingShingle Barbara Y.P. Leung
Eddie C.M. Hui
Evaluation approach on public‐private partnership (PPP) urban redevelopments
International Journal of Strategic Property Management
Public‐Private Partnership
Cost‐Benefit Analysis
Option Pricing
Urban redevelopment
London Docklands
title Evaluation approach on public‐private partnership (PPP) urban redevelopments
title_full Evaluation approach on public‐private partnership (PPP) urban redevelopments
title_fullStr Evaluation approach on public‐private partnership (PPP) urban redevelopments
title_full_unstemmed Evaluation approach on public‐private partnership (PPP) urban redevelopments
title_short Evaluation approach on public‐private partnership (PPP) urban redevelopments
title_sort evaluation approach on public private partnership ppp urban redevelopments
topic Public‐Private Partnership
Cost‐Benefit Analysis
Option Pricing
Urban redevelopment
London Docklands
url https://www.bme.vgtu.lt/index.php/IJSPM/article/view/7257
work_keys_str_mv AT barbaraypleung evaluationapproachonpublicprivatepartnershippppurbanredevelopments
AT eddiecmhui evaluationapproachonpublicprivatepartnershippppurbanredevelopments