Avoidance Learning Across the Menstrual Cycle: A Conceptual Replication

Hormonal transitions across the menstrual cycle may modulate human reward processing and reinforcement learning, but previous results were contradictory. Studies assessed relatively small samples (n < 30) and exclusively used within-subject designs to compare women in hormonally distinct mens...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Esther K. Diekhof, Sina Korf, Franziska Ott, Carolin Schädlich, Sarah K. C. Holtfrerich
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Frontiers Media S.A. 2020-04-01
Series:Frontiers in Endocrinology
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fendo.2020.00231/full
_version_ 1818304576076382208
author Esther K. Diekhof
Sina Korf
Franziska Ott
Carolin Schädlich
Sarah K. C. Holtfrerich
author_facet Esther K. Diekhof
Sina Korf
Franziska Ott
Carolin Schädlich
Sarah K. C. Holtfrerich
author_sort Esther K. Diekhof
collection DOAJ
description Hormonal transitions across the menstrual cycle may modulate human reward processing and reinforcement learning, but previous results were contradictory. Studies assessed relatively small samples (n < 30) and exclusively used within-subject designs to compare women in hormonally distinct menstrual cycle phases. This increased the risk of sporadic findings and results may have been disproportionally affected by expectancy effects. Also, replication studies are widely missing, which currently precludes any reliable inferences. The present study was intended as a conceptual replication of a previous study [(1), Neuropsychologia 84; n = 15]. There, we had observed a reduction in avoidance learning capacity when women were in the high estradiol state of the late follicular phase as compared to the mid luteal phase with enhanced progesterone influence. These results conformed to the idea that estradiol and progesterone may antagonistically modulate dopaminergic transmission as a dopamine agonist and antagonist, respectively. Heightened progesterone in the luteal phase thereby supported the ability to learn from the negative outcomes of one's actions, while the follicular rise in estradiol interfered with this capacity. Here, we re-examined the above described within-subject difference between the follicular and the luteal phase in a between-subjects design. Seventy-five women were tested once with a probabilistic feedback learning task, while being either in the follicular (36 women) or luteal phase (39 women), and were compared for phase-related differences in behavior. Secondly, we combined the new data with data from three previous studies from our laboratory that used the same task and menstrual cycle phases. This meta-analysis included only data from the first test day, free of any biasing expectancy effects. Both analyses demonstrated the consistency of the decline in avoidance learning in the follicular relative to the luteal phase. We also showed that this decline reliably occurred in all of the included samples. Altogether, these results provide evidence for the consistency of a behavioral difference and its apparent association with a transient change in hormonal state that occurs in the natural menstrual cycle. Our findings may also open new avenues for the development of reliable between-subjects test protocols in menstrual cycle research.
first_indexed 2024-12-13T06:12:53Z
format Article
id doaj.art-16731bbe5c5e43668a51c5b9d62f32dc
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1664-2392
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-13T06:12:53Z
publishDate 2020-04-01
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format Article
series Frontiers in Endocrinology
spelling doaj.art-16731bbe5c5e43668a51c5b9d62f32dc2022-12-21T23:57:03ZengFrontiers Media S.A.Frontiers in Endocrinology1664-23922020-04-011110.3389/fendo.2020.00231514337Avoidance Learning Across the Menstrual Cycle: A Conceptual ReplicationEsther K. DiekhofSina KorfFranziska OttCarolin SchädlichSarah K. C. HoltfrerichHormonal transitions across the menstrual cycle may modulate human reward processing and reinforcement learning, but previous results were contradictory. Studies assessed relatively small samples (n < 30) and exclusively used within-subject designs to compare women in hormonally distinct menstrual cycle phases. This increased the risk of sporadic findings and results may have been disproportionally affected by expectancy effects. Also, replication studies are widely missing, which currently precludes any reliable inferences. The present study was intended as a conceptual replication of a previous study [(1), Neuropsychologia 84; n = 15]. There, we had observed a reduction in avoidance learning capacity when women were in the high estradiol state of the late follicular phase as compared to the mid luteal phase with enhanced progesterone influence. These results conformed to the idea that estradiol and progesterone may antagonistically modulate dopaminergic transmission as a dopamine agonist and antagonist, respectively. Heightened progesterone in the luteal phase thereby supported the ability to learn from the negative outcomes of one's actions, while the follicular rise in estradiol interfered with this capacity. Here, we re-examined the above described within-subject difference between the follicular and the luteal phase in a between-subjects design. Seventy-five women were tested once with a probabilistic feedback learning task, while being either in the follicular (36 women) or luteal phase (39 women), and were compared for phase-related differences in behavior. Secondly, we combined the new data with data from three previous studies from our laboratory that used the same task and menstrual cycle phases. This meta-analysis included only data from the first test day, free of any biasing expectancy effects. Both analyses demonstrated the consistency of the decline in avoidance learning in the follicular relative to the luteal phase. We also showed that this decline reliably occurred in all of the included samples. Altogether, these results provide evidence for the consistency of a behavioral difference and its apparent association with a transient change in hormonal state that occurs in the natural menstrual cycle. Our findings may also open new avenues for the development of reliable between-subjects test protocols in menstrual cycle research.https://www.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fendo.2020.00231/fullestrogen (17β-estradiol)menstrual cyclereplication crisis in psychologyreinforcement learning (RL)meta-analysisprogesterone and estradiol
spellingShingle Esther K. Diekhof
Sina Korf
Franziska Ott
Carolin Schädlich
Sarah K. C. Holtfrerich
Avoidance Learning Across the Menstrual Cycle: A Conceptual Replication
Frontiers in Endocrinology
estrogen (17β-estradiol)
menstrual cycle
replication crisis in psychology
reinforcement learning (RL)
meta-analysis
progesterone and estradiol
title Avoidance Learning Across the Menstrual Cycle: A Conceptual Replication
title_full Avoidance Learning Across the Menstrual Cycle: A Conceptual Replication
title_fullStr Avoidance Learning Across the Menstrual Cycle: A Conceptual Replication
title_full_unstemmed Avoidance Learning Across the Menstrual Cycle: A Conceptual Replication
title_short Avoidance Learning Across the Menstrual Cycle: A Conceptual Replication
title_sort avoidance learning across the menstrual cycle a conceptual replication
topic estrogen (17β-estradiol)
menstrual cycle
replication crisis in psychology
reinforcement learning (RL)
meta-analysis
progesterone and estradiol
url https://www.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fendo.2020.00231/full
work_keys_str_mv AT estherkdiekhof avoidancelearningacrossthemenstrualcycleaconceptualreplication
AT sinakorf avoidancelearningacrossthemenstrualcycleaconceptualreplication
AT franziskaott avoidancelearningacrossthemenstrualcycleaconceptualreplication
AT carolinschadlich avoidancelearningacrossthemenstrualcycleaconceptualreplication
AT sarahkcholtfrerich avoidancelearningacrossthemenstrualcycleaconceptualreplication