Antarctic ice-sheet structures retrieved from P-wave coda autocorrelation method and comparisons with two other single-station passive seismic methods
Passive seismology is becoming increasingly popular for glacier/ice-sheet structure investigations in Polar regions. Single-station passive seismic methods including P-wave receiver functions (PRFs), horizontal-to-vertical spectral ratio (HVSR) and a recently proposed autocorrelation method have bee...
Main Authors: | , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Cambridge University Press
2020-02-01
|
Series: | Journal of Glaciology |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S0022143019000959/type/journal_article |
_version_ | 1811155780301225984 |
---|---|
author | Peng Yan Zhiwei Li Fei Li Yuande Yang Weifeng Hao |
author_facet | Peng Yan Zhiwei Li Fei Li Yuande Yang Weifeng Hao |
author_sort | Peng Yan |
collection | DOAJ |
description | Passive seismology is becoming increasingly popular for glacier/ice-sheet structure investigations in Polar regions. Single-station passive seismic methods including P-wave receiver functions (PRFs), horizontal-to-vertical spectral ratio (HVSR) and a recently proposed autocorrelation method have been used to retrieve glacier/ice-sheet structures. Despite their successful applications, analysis regarding their detection abilities in different glaciological environments has not been reported. In this study, we compare ice thicknesses and vp/vs ratios obtained from the three methods using data collected at GAMSEIS and POLENET/ANET seismic arrays in Antarctica. Ice thickness estimates derived from the three methods are found to be consistent. Comparisons conducted under various model setups, including those involving tiled layers and sedimentary layers, show that the effectiveness of the autocorrelation method is not superior to the PRF method for retrieving ice-sheet structures. The autocorrelation method however can complement other methods as it only requires a single component seismic record. |
first_indexed | 2024-04-10T04:40:23Z |
format | Article |
id | doaj.art-1673c1662b7743b897a0809a74d13f59 |
institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
issn | 0022-1430 1727-5652 |
language | English |
last_indexed | 2024-04-10T04:40:23Z |
publishDate | 2020-02-01 |
publisher | Cambridge University Press |
record_format | Article |
series | Journal of Glaciology |
spelling | doaj.art-1673c1662b7743b897a0809a74d13f592023-03-09T12:40:51ZengCambridge University PressJournal of Glaciology0022-14301727-56522020-02-016615316510.1017/jog.2019.95Antarctic ice-sheet structures retrieved from P-wave coda autocorrelation method and comparisons with two other single-station passive seismic methodsPeng Yan0https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4210-533XZhiwei Li1Fei Li2Yuande Yang3Weifeng Hao4Chinese Antarctic Center of Surveying and Mapping, Wuhan University, Wuhan430079, ChinaState Key Laboratory of Geodesy and Earth's Dynamics, Institute of Geodesy and Geophysics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Wuhan430077, ChinaChinese Antarctic Center of Surveying and Mapping, Wuhan University, Wuhan430079, China State Key Laboratory of Information Engineering in Surveying, Mapping and Remote Sensing, Wuhan University, Wuhan430079, ChinaChinese Antarctic Center of Surveying and Mapping, Wuhan University, Wuhan430079, ChinaChinese Antarctic Center of Surveying and Mapping, Wuhan University, Wuhan430079, ChinaPassive seismology is becoming increasingly popular for glacier/ice-sheet structure investigations in Polar regions. Single-station passive seismic methods including P-wave receiver functions (PRFs), horizontal-to-vertical spectral ratio (HVSR) and a recently proposed autocorrelation method have been used to retrieve glacier/ice-sheet structures. Despite their successful applications, analysis regarding their detection abilities in different glaciological environments has not been reported. In this study, we compare ice thicknesses and vp/vs ratios obtained from the three methods using data collected at GAMSEIS and POLENET/ANET seismic arrays in Antarctica. Ice thickness estimates derived from the three methods are found to be consistent. Comparisons conducted under various model setups, including those involving tiled layers and sedimentary layers, show that the effectiveness of the autocorrelation method is not superior to the PRF method for retrieving ice-sheet structures. The autocorrelation method however can complement other methods as it only requires a single component seismic record.https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S0022143019000959/type/journal_articleAntarctic glaciologyglacier geophysicsice-sheet modelingice thickness measurementsseismology |
spellingShingle | Peng Yan Zhiwei Li Fei Li Yuande Yang Weifeng Hao Antarctic ice-sheet structures retrieved from P-wave coda autocorrelation method and comparisons with two other single-station passive seismic methods Journal of Glaciology Antarctic glaciology glacier geophysics ice-sheet modeling ice thickness measurements seismology |
title | Antarctic ice-sheet structures retrieved from P-wave coda autocorrelation method and comparisons with two other single-station passive seismic methods |
title_full | Antarctic ice-sheet structures retrieved from P-wave coda autocorrelation method and comparisons with two other single-station passive seismic methods |
title_fullStr | Antarctic ice-sheet structures retrieved from P-wave coda autocorrelation method and comparisons with two other single-station passive seismic methods |
title_full_unstemmed | Antarctic ice-sheet structures retrieved from P-wave coda autocorrelation method and comparisons with two other single-station passive seismic methods |
title_short | Antarctic ice-sheet structures retrieved from P-wave coda autocorrelation method and comparisons with two other single-station passive seismic methods |
title_sort | antarctic ice sheet structures retrieved from p wave coda autocorrelation method and comparisons with two other single station passive seismic methods |
topic | Antarctic glaciology glacier geophysics ice-sheet modeling ice thickness measurements seismology |
url | https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S0022143019000959/type/journal_article |
work_keys_str_mv | AT pengyan antarcticicesheetstructuresretrievedfrompwavecodaautocorrelationmethodandcomparisonswithtwoothersinglestationpassiveseismicmethods AT zhiweili antarcticicesheetstructuresretrievedfrompwavecodaautocorrelationmethodandcomparisonswithtwoothersinglestationpassiveseismicmethods AT feili antarcticicesheetstructuresretrievedfrompwavecodaautocorrelationmethodandcomparisonswithtwoothersinglestationpassiveseismicmethods AT yuandeyang antarcticicesheetstructuresretrievedfrompwavecodaautocorrelationmethodandcomparisonswithtwoothersinglestationpassiveseismicmethods AT weifenghao antarcticicesheetstructuresretrievedfrompwavecodaautocorrelationmethodandcomparisonswithtwoothersinglestationpassiveseismicmethods |