Antarctic ice-sheet structures retrieved from P-wave coda autocorrelation method and comparisons with two other single-station passive seismic methods

Passive seismology is becoming increasingly popular for glacier/ice-sheet structure investigations in Polar regions. Single-station passive seismic methods including P-wave receiver functions (PRFs), horizontal-to-vertical spectral ratio (HVSR) and a recently proposed autocorrelation method have bee...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Peng Yan, Zhiwei Li, Fei Li, Yuande Yang, Weifeng Hao
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Cambridge University Press 2020-02-01
Series:Journal of Glaciology
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S0022143019000959/type/journal_article
_version_ 1811155780301225984
author Peng Yan
Zhiwei Li
Fei Li
Yuande Yang
Weifeng Hao
author_facet Peng Yan
Zhiwei Li
Fei Li
Yuande Yang
Weifeng Hao
author_sort Peng Yan
collection DOAJ
description Passive seismology is becoming increasingly popular for glacier/ice-sheet structure investigations in Polar regions. Single-station passive seismic methods including P-wave receiver functions (PRFs), horizontal-to-vertical spectral ratio (HVSR) and a recently proposed autocorrelation method have been used to retrieve glacier/ice-sheet structures. Despite their successful applications, analysis regarding their detection abilities in different glaciological environments has not been reported. In this study, we compare ice thicknesses and vp/vs ratios obtained from the three methods using data collected at GAMSEIS and POLENET/ANET seismic arrays in Antarctica. Ice thickness estimates derived from the three methods are found to be consistent. Comparisons conducted under various model setups, including those involving tiled layers and sedimentary layers, show that the effectiveness of the autocorrelation method is not superior to the PRF method for retrieving ice-sheet structures. The autocorrelation method however can complement other methods as it only requires a single component seismic record.
first_indexed 2024-04-10T04:40:23Z
format Article
id doaj.art-1673c1662b7743b897a0809a74d13f59
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 0022-1430
1727-5652
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-10T04:40:23Z
publishDate 2020-02-01
publisher Cambridge University Press
record_format Article
series Journal of Glaciology
spelling doaj.art-1673c1662b7743b897a0809a74d13f592023-03-09T12:40:51ZengCambridge University PressJournal of Glaciology0022-14301727-56522020-02-016615316510.1017/jog.2019.95Antarctic ice-sheet structures retrieved from P-wave coda autocorrelation method and comparisons with two other single-station passive seismic methodsPeng Yan0https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4210-533XZhiwei Li1Fei Li2Yuande Yang3Weifeng Hao4Chinese Antarctic Center of Surveying and Mapping, Wuhan University, Wuhan430079, ChinaState Key Laboratory of Geodesy and Earth's Dynamics, Institute of Geodesy and Geophysics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Wuhan430077, ChinaChinese Antarctic Center of Surveying and Mapping, Wuhan University, Wuhan430079, China State Key Laboratory of Information Engineering in Surveying, Mapping and Remote Sensing, Wuhan University, Wuhan430079, ChinaChinese Antarctic Center of Surveying and Mapping, Wuhan University, Wuhan430079, ChinaChinese Antarctic Center of Surveying and Mapping, Wuhan University, Wuhan430079, ChinaPassive seismology is becoming increasingly popular for glacier/ice-sheet structure investigations in Polar regions. Single-station passive seismic methods including P-wave receiver functions (PRFs), horizontal-to-vertical spectral ratio (HVSR) and a recently proposed autocorrelation method have been used to retrieve glacier/ice-sheet structures. Despite their successful applications, analysis regarding their detection abilities in different glaciological environments has not been reported. In this study, we compare ice thicknesses and vp/vs ratios obtained from the three methods using data collected at GAMSEIS and POLENET/ANET seismic arrays in Antarctica. Ice thickness estimates derived from the three methods are found to be consistent. Comparisons conducted under various model setups, including those involving tiled layers and sedimentary layers, show that the effectiveness of the autocorrelation method is not superior to the PRF method for retrieving ice-sheet structures. The autocorrelation method however can complement other methods as it only requires a single component seismic record.https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S0022143019000959/type/journal_articleAntarctic glaciologyglacier geophysicsice-sheet modelingice thickness measurementsseismology
spellingShingle Peng Yan
Zhiwei Li
Fei Li
Yuande Yang
Weifeng Hao
Antarctic ice-sheet structures retrieved from P-wave coda autocorrelation method and comparisons with two other single-station passive seismic methods
Journal of Glaciology
Antarctic glaciology
glacier geophysics
ice-sheet modeling
ice thickness measurements
seismology
title Antarctic ice-sheet structures retrieved from P-wave coda autocorrelation method and comparisons with two other single-station passive seismic methods
title_full Antarctic ice-sheet structures retrieved from P-wave coda autocorrelation method and comparisons with two other single-station passive seismic methods
title_fullStr Antarctic ice-sheet structures retrieved from P-wave coda autocorrelation method and comparisons with two other single-station passive seismic methods
title_full_unstemmed Antarctic ice-sheet structures retrieved from P-wave coda autocorrelation method and comparisons with two other single-station passive seismic methods
title_short Antarctic ice-sheet structures retrieved from P-wave coda autocorrelation method and comparisons with two other single-station passive seismic methods
title_sort antarctic ice sheet structures retrieved from p wave coda autocorrelation method and comparisons with two other single station passive seismic methods
topic Antarctic glaciology
glacier geophysics
ice-sheet modeling
ice thickness measurements
seismology
url https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S0022143019000959/type/journal_article
work_keys_str_mv AT pengyan antarcticicesheetstructuresretrievedfrompwavecodaautocorrelationmethodandcomparisonswithtwoothersinglestationpassiveseismicmethods
AT zhiweili antarcticicesheetstructuresretrievedfrompwavecodaautocorrelationmethodandcomparisonswithtwoothersinglestationpassiveseismicmethods
AT feili antarcticicesheetstructuresretrievedfrompwavecodaautocorrelationmethodandcomparisonswithtwoothersinglestationpassiveseismicmethods
AT yuandeyang antarcticicesheetstructuresretrievedfrompwavecodaautocorrelationmethodandcomparisonswithtwoothersinglestationpassiveseismicmethods
AT weifenghao antarcticicesheetstructuresretrievedfrompwavecodaautocorrelationmethodandcomparisonswithtwoothersinglestationpassiveseismicmethods