Disruptive Behavior in the Postdisciplinary Society
Responding to disruptive behavior has become increasingly problematic in current Westernized societies, impacting people’s well-being globally. In the context of the current Special Issue, in this article, we advance the concept of problematic disruptive behavior (PDB) as a suitable “window” to bett...
| Main Authors: | , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2021-09-01
|
| Series: | Frontiers in Psychology |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.740856/full |
| _version_ | 1818671249052663808 |
|---|---|
| author | Joaquin Gaete-Silva Joaquin Gaete-Silva Joaquin Gaete-Silva Alfredo Gaete |
| author_facet | Joaquin Gaete-Silva Joaquin Gaete-Silva Joaquin Gaete-Silva Alfredo Gaete |
| author_sort | Joaquin Gaete-Silva |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | Responding to disruptive behavior has become increasingly problematic in current Westernized societies, impacting people’s well-being globally. In the context of the current Special Issue, in this article, we advance the concept of problematic disruptive behavior (PDB) as a suitable “window” to better understand some aspects of the deep interdependence of social participation, citizenship, justice, and well-being. To do so, we also advance the notion of postdisciplinary society to account both for the apparent rise of problematic disruptive experiences, and the increased social conflict within which such experiences get often entangled. More specifically, we argue that formerly morally acceptable responses to problematic disruption, such as punishment and discipline, have lost social legitimacy and, to that extent, they aggravate the problems they were intended to resolve. We provide a genealogical account of the surge of such postdisciplinary order with a focus on the moral transition on ideas of justice, of personal entitlements, and authority. We conclude outlining an alternative way to respond to disruptive behaviors that we anticipate will be both more effective and acceptable in the current postdisciplinary milieu. |
| first_indexed | 2024-12-17T07:21:00Z |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj.art-167868fe8d1446a69bfaf228f97556cd |
| institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
| issn | 1664-1078 |
| language | English |
| last_indexed | 2024-12-17T07:21:00Z |
| publishDate | 2021-09-01 |
| publisher | Frontiers Media S.A. |
| record_format | Article |
| series | Frontiers in Psychology |
| spelling | doaj.art-167868fe8d1446a69bfaf228f97556cd2022-12-21T21:58:45ZengFrontiers Media S.A.Frontiers in Psychology1664-10782021-09-011210.3389/fpsyg.2021.740856740856Disruptive Behavior in the Postdisciplinary SocietyJoaquin Gaete-Silva0Joaquin Gaete-Silva1Joaquin Gaete-Silva2Alfredo Gaete3Werklund School of Education, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, CanadaCalgary Family Therapy Centre, Calgary, AB, CanadaSchool of Psychology, Universidad Adolfo Ibáñez, Santiago, ChileCampus Villarrica, Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile, Villarrica, ChileResponding to disruptive behavior has become increasingly problematic in current Westernized societies, impacting people’s well-being globally. In the context of the current Special Issue, in this article, we advance the concept of problematic disruptive behavior (PDB) as a suitable “window” to better understand some aspects of the deep interdependence of social participation, citizenship, justice, and well-being. To do so, we also advance the notion of postdisciplinary society to account both for the apparent rise of problematic disruptive experiences, and the increased social conflict within which such experiences get often entangled. More specifically, we argue that formerly morally acceptable responses to problematic disruption, such as punishment and discipline, have lost social legitimacy and, to that extent, they aggravate the problems they were intended to resolve. We provide a genealogical account of the surge of such postdisciplinary order with a focus on the moral transition on ideas of justice, of personal entitlements, and authority. We conclude outlining an alternative way to respond to disruptive behaviors that we anticipate will be both more effective and acceptable in the current postdisciplinary milieu.https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.740856/fulldisruptive behaviornormalizationinclusionjusticewell-beingdiversity |
| spellingShingle | Joaquin Gaete-Silva Joaquin Gaete-Silva Joaquin Gaete-Silva Alfredo Gaete Disruptive Behavior in the Postdisciplinary Society Frontiers in Psychology disruptive behavior normalization inclusion justice well-being diversity |
| title | Disruptive Behavior in the Postdisciplinary Society |
| title_full | Disruptive Behavior in the Postdisciplinary Society |
| title_fullStr | Disruptive Behavior in the Postdisciplinary Society |
| title_full_unstemmed | Disruptive Behavior in the Postdisciplinary Society |
| title_short | Disruptive Behavior in the Postdisciplinary Society |
| title_sort | disruptive behavior in the postdisciplinary society |
| topic | disruptive behavior normalization inclusion justice well-being diversity |
| url | https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.740856/full |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT joaquingaetesilva disruptivebehaviorinthepostdisciplinarysociety AT joaquingaetesilva disruptivebehaviorinthepostdisciplinarysociety AT joaquingaetesilva disruptivebehaviorinthepostdisciplinarysociety AT alfredogaete disruptivebehaviorinthepostdisciplinarysociety |