Comparison of Coding Schemas for Rural-Urban Designations with New York State Counties and Birth Outcomes as Exemplars

Purpose The purposes of this article are to provide background information on the agencies responsible for the development of rural coding schemas at the county level, to explain the types of codes and the definitions of terms included in the codes, and to provide a concise table that presents the a...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: A. Serdar Atav, Rosa Darling
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Rural Nurse Organization; Binghamton University 2012-03-01
Series:Online Journal of Rural Nursing and Health Care
Online Access:https://rnojournal.binghamton.edu/index.php/RNO/article/view/35
_version_ 1827767052490768384
author A. Serdar Atav
Rosa Darling
author_facet A. Serdar Atav
Rosa Darling
author_sort A. Serdar Atav
collection DOAJ
description Purpose The purposes of this article are to provide background information on the agencies responsible for the development of rural coding schemas at the county level, to explain the types of codes and the definitions of terms included in the codes, and to provide a concise table that presents the assigned codes for each county in New York State. Findings Roles of U.S. Census Bureau, Office of Management and Budget, and Economic Research Service were described. At the county level, Urban Influence Codes, Rural Urban Continuum Codes, and NCHS Codes were outlined and compared. RUCA and Frontier Community Codes were discussed as non-county based rural classification schemas. Conclusions Nursing is integral to the attainment of better health outcomes through advocacy and policy recommendation at federal, state, and local levels. Accurate measures of rurality should be applied at the decision making level for the allocation of scarce resources that support projects and programs most effective for vulnerable rural populations. Maintaining policies that benefit vulnerable populations requires funding; but needs analyses using inappropriate coding schemas can result in lack of funding or the implementation of policies that are ineffective for the targeted population. This study attempted to elucidate nuances among the three rural coding schemas and demonstrated that using the appropriate rural coding schema may highlight rural/urban health disparities more clearly. Key Words Classification schemas, County, Rural Definitions, Rural-Urban Codes, New York State
first_indexed 2024-03-11T11:53:31Z
format Article
id doaj.art-16863e42330e47559365403c1170d2d5
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1539-3399
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-11T11:53:31Z
publishDate 2012-03-01
publisher Rural Nurse Organization; Binghamton University
record_format Article
series Online Journal of Rural Nursing and Health Care
spelling doaj.art-16863e42330e47559365403c1170d2d52023-11-08T20:14:58ZengRural Nurse Organization; Binghamton UniversityOnline Journal of Rural Nursing and Health Care1539-33992012-03-01121293910.14574/ojrnhc.v12i1.3532Comparison of Coding Schemas for Rural-Urban Designations with New York State Counties and Birth Outcomes as ExemplarsA. Serdar Atav0Rosa Darling1Binghamton UniversityBinghamton UniversityPurpose The purposes of this article are to provide background information on the agencies responsible for the development of rural coding schemas at the county level, to explain the types of codes and the definitions of terms included in the codes, and to provide a concise table that presents the assigned codes for each county in New York State. Findings Roles of U.S. Census Bureau, Office of Management and Budget, and Economic Research Service were described. At the county level, Urban Influence Codes, Rural Urban Continuum Codes, and NCHS Codes were outlined and compared. RUCA and Frontier Community Codes were discussed as non-county based rural classification schemas. Conclusions Nursing is integral to the attainment of better health outcomes through advocacy and policy recommendation at federal, state, and local levels. Accurate measures of rurality should be applied at the decision making level for the allocation of scarce resources that support projects and programs most effective for vulnerable rural populations. Maintaining policies that benefit vulnerable populations requires funding; but needs analyses using inappropriate coding schemas can result in lack of funding or the implementation of policies that are ineffective for the targeted population. This study attempted to elucidate nuances among the three rural coding schemas and demonstrated that using the appropriate rural coding schema may highlight rural/urban health disparities more clearly. Key Words Classification schemas, County, Rural Definitions, Rural-Urban Codes, New York Statehttps://rnojournal.binghamton.edu/index.php/RNO/article/view/35
spellingShingle A. Serdar Atav
Rosa Darling
Comparison of Coding Schemas for Rural-Urban Designations with New York State Counties and Birth Outcomes as Exemplars
Online Journal of Rural Nursing and Health Care
title Comparison of Coding Schemas for Rural-Urban Designations with New York State Counties and Birth Outcomes as Exemplars
title_full Comparison of Coding Schemas for Rural-Urban Designations with New York State Counties and Birth Outcomes as Exemplars
title_fullStr Comparison of Coding Schemas for Rural-Urban Designations with New York State Counties and Birth Outcomes as Exemplars
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of Coding Schemas for Rural-Urban Designations with New York State Counties and Birth Outcomes as Exemplars
title_short Comparison of Coding Schemas for Rural-Urban Designations with New York State Counties and Birth Outcomes as Exemplars
title_sort comparison of coding schemas for rural urban designations with new york state counties and birth outcomes as exemplars
url https://rnojournal.binghamton.edu/index.php/RNO/article/view/35
work_keys_str_mv AT aserdaratav comparisonofcodingschemasforruralurbandesignationswithnewyorkstatecountiesandbirthoutcomesasexemplars
AT rosadarling comparisonofcodingschemasforruralurbandesignationswithnewyorkstatecountiesandbirthoutcomesasexemplars