Sustaining reductions in postoperative nausea and vomiting after evidence-based practice initiative: A success story

Background: Postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV) remains a signifi cant problem in the surgical population. Many researchers have demonstrated signifi cant reductions in institutional PONV when risk screening and antiemetic prophylaxis protocols are implemented. These protocols have not been uni...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Christopher A Smith, Richard E Haas
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Edizioni FS 2017-07-01
Series:Journal of Health and Social Sciences
Subjects:
Online Access:http://journalhss.com/wp-content/uploads/jhhs22_149-160.pdf
_version_ 1811316319109251072
author Christopher A Smith
Richard E Haas
author_facet Christopher A Smith
Richard E Haas
author_sort Christopher A Smith
collection DOAJ
description Background: Postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV) remains a signifi cant problem in the surgical population. Many researchers have demonstrated signifi cant reductions in institutional PONV when risk screening and antiemetic prophylaxis protocols are implemented. These protocols have not been universally adopted. Our adoption and implementation led to signifi cant reductions in PONV. The challenge is to sustain these reductions over time. Methods: A retrospective cohort chart review of consecutive surgical patients (n = 1002) during the period encompassing October through November of 2016, the sustainability group (G16). Descriptive statistics were used to compare G16 with the implementation group (G14) in regard to demographic data, and Z-score and Chi-square (χ2) statistics were utilized to determine levels of signifi cance. Correlations were calculated to determine levels of compliance to the protocol and the incidence of PONV. Results: A significant (P = 0.0007) reduction in PONV incidence was identified as 8.5% (85/1002) in G16 compared to 13.4% (134/997) achieved in G14. Overall compliance with the targeted prophylaxis protocol was 87.2% (G16, 874/1002), a significant (P = 0.0001) improvement compared to 79% (G14, 788/997). A 61.1% (11/18) incidence of PONV in laparoscopic gastric bypass patients was identifi ed in the G16 group. Conclusions: Initial reductions in PONV were not only sustained but significantly improved. Preoperative risk assessment for PONV, risk stratification, and fidelity to anti-emetic prophylaxis protocols reduce the incidence of PONV in the post-anesthesia care unit. High-risk patients require three or more interventions to obtain acceptable reductions in PONV. Laparoscopic gastric bypass patients remain a high-risk group requiring aggressive multimodal prophylaxis beyond their Apfel simplifi ed risk score.
first_indexed 2024-04-13T11:47:58Z
format Article
id doaj.art-168a5732250f4f0bae9d24653c949b55
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2499-2240
2499-5886
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-13T11:47:58Z
publishDate 2017-07-01
publisher Edizioni FS
record_format Article
series Journal of Health and Social Sciences
spelling doaj.art-168a5732250f4f0bae9d24653c949b552022-12-22T02:48:08ZengEdizioni FSJournal of Health and Social Sciences2499-22402499-58862017-07-012214916010.19204/2017/sstn3Sustaining reductions in postoperative nausea and vomiting after evidence-based practice initiative: A success storyChristopher A Smith0Richard E Haas1Anesthesia Associates of York and Department of Anesthesia, WellSpan Health, York Hospital, York, USAYork College of Pennsylvania/WellSpan Health Nurse Anesthetist Program, York, USA, and Department of Anesthesia, WellSpan Health, York Hospital, York, USABackground: Postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV) remains a signifi cant problem in the surgical population. Many researchers have demonstrated signifi cant reductions in institutional PONV when risk screening and antiemetic prophylaxis protocols are implemented. These protocols have not been universally adopted. Our adoption and implementation led to signifi cant reductions in PONV. The challenge is to sustain these reductions over time. Methods: A retrospective cohort chart review of consecutive surgical patients (n = 1002) during the period encompassing October through November of 2016, the sustainability group (G16). Descriptive statistics were used to compare G16 with the implementation group (G14) in regard to demographic data, and Z-score and Chi-square (χ2) statistics were utilized to determine levels of signifi cance. Correlations were calculated to determine levels of compliance to the protocol and the incidence of PONV. Results: A significant (P = 0.0007) reduction in PONV incidence was identified as 8.5% (85/1002) in G16 compared to 13.4% (134/997) achieved in G14. Overall compliance with the targeted prophylaxis protocol was 87.2% (G16, 874/1002), a significant (P = 0.0001) improvement compared to 79% (G14, 788/997). A 61.1% (11/18) incidence of PONV in laparoscopic gastric bypass patients was identifi ed in the G16 group. Conclusions: Initial reductions in PONV were not only sustained but significantly improved. Preoperative risk assessment for PONV, risk stratification, and fidelity to anti-emetic prophylaxis protocols reduce the incidence of PONV in the post-anesthesia care unit. High-risk patients require three or more interventions to obtain acceptable reductions in PONV. Laparoscopic gastric bypass patients remain a high-risk group requiring aggressive multimodal prophylaxis beyond their Apfel simplifi ed risk score.http://journalhss.com/wp-content/uploads/jhhs22_149-160.pdfAntiemeticsevidence based practicepatient satisfactionpostoperative nausea and vomiting
spellingShingle Christopher A Smith
Richard E Haas
Sustaining reductions in postoperative nausea and vomiting after evidence-based practice initiative: A success story
Journal of Health and Social Sciences
Antiemetics
evidence based practice
patient satisfaction
postoperative nausea and vomiting
title Sustaining reductions in postoperative nausea and vomiting after evidence-based practice initiative: A success story
title_full Sustaining reductions in postoperative nausea and vomiting after evidence-based practice initiative: A success story
title_fullStr Sustaining reductions in postoperative nausea and vomiting after evidence-based practice initiative: A success story
title_full_unstemmed Sustaining reductions in postoperative nausea and vomiting after evidence-based practice initiative: A success story
title_short Sustaining reductions in postoperative nausea and vomiting after evidence-based practice initiative: A success story
title_sort sustaining reductions in postoperative nausea and vomiting after evidence based practice initiative a success story
topic Antiemetics
evidence based practice
patient satisfaction
postoperative nausea and vomiting
url http://journalhss.com/wp-content/uploads/jhhs22_149-160.pdf
work_keys_str_mv AT christopherasmith sustainingreductionsinpostoperativenauseaandvomitingafterevidencebasedpracticeinitiativeasuccessstory
AT richardehaas sustainingreductionsinpostoperativenauseaandvomitingafterevidencebasedpracticeinitiativeasuccessstory