Ninian Smart and the Dialectic of Religious Beliefs and Experiences
In recent philosophical analysis of religious experience and discussion on the relation of beliefs and experiences, Ninian Smart is said to be, amongst such other philosophers as Katz and Hick, a maximal constructivist. Distinguishing theistic and non-theistic contexts of experiences, Smart suggests...
| 主要な著者: | , |
|---|---|
| フォーマット: | 論文 |
| 言語: | fas |
| 出版事項: |
Imam Sadiq University
2013-10-01
|
| シリーズ: | پژوهشنامه فلسفه دین |
| 主題: | |
| オンライン･アクセス: | https://prrj.isu.ac.ir/article_1478_eafdd2c2a445315c301d2533972fadb5.pdf |
| 要約: | In recent philosophical analysis of religious experience and discussion on the relation of beliefs and experiences, Ninian Smart is said to be, amongst such other philosophers as Katz and Hick, a maximal constructivist. Distinguishing theistic and non-theistic contexts of experiences, Smart suggests a two poles theory of religious experience, and draws attention to different levels of interpretation. He holds that cultural-religious contexts, including religious beliefs, influence religious experience, but it is not led to fully determine experience. Accordingly, he takes a position between essentialism and maximal constructivism. This position could call minimal constructivism. |
|---|---|
| ISSN: | 2228-6578 2228-6586 |