Evaluation of the Multiple Reference Frame Approach for the Modelling of an Axial Cooling Fan

The modelling of rotating parts, such as axial fans, is one of the main challenges of current CFD simulations of industrial applications. Different methods are available, but the most commonly used is the multiple reference frame (MRF) method. This paper investigates how different flow properties, s...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Randi Franzke, Simone Sebben, Tore Bark, Emil Willeson, Alexander Broniewicz
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2019-07-01
Series:Energies
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/12/15/2934
_version_ 1811299836980363264
author Randi Franzke
Simone Sebben
Tore Bark
Emil Willeson
Alexander Broniewicz
author_facet Randi Franzke
Simone Sebben
Tore Bark
Emil Willeson
Alexander Broniewicz
author_sort Randi Franzke
collection DOAJ
description The modelling of rotating parts, such as axial fans, is one of the main challenges of current CFD simulations of industrial applications. Different methods are available, but the most commonly used is the multiple reference frame (MRF) method. This paper investigates how different flow properties, such as temperature, pressure and velocity, develop when passing through the MRF domain. The results are compared to the more physical rigid body motion (RBM) approach. It is found that the MRF method transports the upstream properties with the streamlines of the relative velocity from the upstream to the downstream interface. This leads to a non-physical rotation by an angle that is dependent on the length of the domain and the ratio between axial and tangential velocity in the MRF region. The temperature field is more affected than the flow field, since wake structures from upstream obstacles are destroyed due to the wake of the blades. Downstream structures affect the flow in the upstream region by an increase in static pressure, which causes the streamlines in the MRF zone to slow down. Depending on the size of the obstacle, this can cause substantial distortions in the upstream and downstream flow field.
first_indexed 2024-04-13T06:41:46Z
format Article
id doaj.art-169e823b4eb749fbb499146b1dd58578
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1996-1073
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-13T06:41:46Z
publishDate 2019-07-01
publisher MDPI AG
record_format Article
series Energies
spelling doaj.art-169e823b4eb749fbb499146b1dd585782022-12-22T02:57:42ZengMDPI AGEnergies1996-10732019-07-011215293410.3390/en12152934en12152934Evaluation of the Multiple Reference Frame Approach for the Modelling of an Axial Cooling FanRandi Franzke0Simone Sebben1Tore Bark2Emil Willeson3Alexander Broniewicz4Department of Mechanics and Martime Sciences, Chalmers University of Technology, 41 296 Gothenburg, SwedenDepartment of Mechanics and Martime Sciences, Chalmers University of Technology, 41 296 Gothenburg, SwedenVolvo Car Corporation, 41 878 Gothenburg, SwedenVolvo Car Corporation, 41 878 Gothenburg, SwedenVolvo Car Corporation, 41 878 Gothenburg, SwedenThe modelling of rotating parts, such as axial fans, is one of the main challenges of current CFD simulations of industrial applications. Different methods are available, but the most commonly used is the multiple reference frame (MRF) method. This paper investigates how different flow properties, such as temperature, pressure and velocity, develop when passing through the MRF domain. The results are compared to the more physical rigid body motion (RBM) approach. It is found that the MRF method transports the upstream properties with the streamlines of the relative velocity from the upstream to the downstream interface. This leads to a non-physical rotation by an angle that is dependent on the length of the domain and the ratio between axial and tangential velocity in the MRF region. The temperature field is more affected than the flow field, since wake structures from upstream obstacles are destroyed due to the wake of the blades. Downstream structures affect the flow in the upstream region by an increase in static pressure, which causes the streamlines in the MRF zone to slow down. Depending on the size of the obstacle, this can cause substantial distortions in the upstream and downstream flow field.https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/12/15/2934axial fanmultiple reference framerigid body motion
spellingShingle Randi Franzke
Simone Sebben
Tore Bark
Emil Willeson
Alexander Broniewicz
Evaluation of the Multiple Reference Frame Approach for the Modelling of an Axial Cooling Fan
Energies
axial fan
multiple reference frame
rigid body motion
title Evaluation of the Multiple Reference Frame Approach for the Modelling of an Axial Cooling Fan
title_full Evaluation of the Multiple Reference Frame Approach for the Modelling of an Axial Cooling Fan
title_fullStr Evaluation of the Multiple Reference Frame Approach for the Modelling of an Axial Cooling Fan
title_full_unstemmed Evaluation of the Multiple Reference Frame Approach for the Modelling of an Axial Cooling Fan
title_short Evaluation of the Multiple Reference Frame Approach for the Modelling of an Axial Cooling Fan
title_sort evaluation of the multiple reference frame approach for the modelling of an axial cooling fan
topic axial fan
multiple reference frame
rigid body motion
url https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/12/15/2934
work_keys_str_mv AT randifranzke evaluationofthemultiplereferenceframeapproachforthemodellingofanaxialcoolingfan
AT simonesebben evaluationofthemultiplereferenceframeapproachforthemodellingofanaxialcoolingfan
AT torebark evaluationofthemultiplereferenceframeapproachforthemodellingofanaxialcoolingfan
AT emilwilleson evaluationofthemultiplereferenceframeapproachforthemodellingofanaxialcoolingfan
AT alexanderbroniewicz evaluationofthemultiplereferenceframeapproachforthemodellingofanaxialcoolingfan