Comparison of Four Gastrotomy Closure Techniques in Dogs

This study aimed to evaluate and compare four double-layer closure techniques for canine gastrotomy. Twenty adult clinically healthy mongrel dogs of both sexes were involved in the present study. Dogs were randomly allocated into four groups; A, B, C, and D (n=5 for each group) based on the used te...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Rasha E. Abdelkader, Ahmed F. Ahmed, Sary Kh. Abd-elghaffar, Mohamed Semieka
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Assiut University 2023-06-01
Series:Journal of Advanced Veterinary Research
Subjects:
Online Access:https://advetresearch.com/index.php/AVR/article/view/1219
_version_ 1797657029468225536
author Rasha E. Abdelkader
Ahmed F. Ahmed
Sary Kh. Abd-elghaffar
Mohamed Semieka
author_facet Rasha E. Abdelkader
Ahmed F. Ahmed
Sary Kh. Abd-elghaffar
Mohamed Semieka
author_sort Rasha E. Abdelkader
collection DOAJ
description This study aimed to evaluate and compare four double-layer closure techniques for canine gastrotomy. Twenty adult clinically healthy mongrel dogs of both sexes were involved in the present study. Dogs were randomly allocated into four groups; A, B, C, and D (n=5 for each group) based on the used technique for gastrotomy closure. In group A, the first layer of the stomach wall (mucosa and submucosa) and the second layer (tunica muscularis and tunica serosa) were closed in simple continuous suture pattern. In group B, both layers were closed using inverting suture pattern. In group C, the first layer was closed by inverting suture pattern, while the second layer was closed by simple continuous suture pattern. In the group D, the first layer was closed by simple continuous suture pattern, while the second layer was closed by stabling using the skin staplers. Physiological parameters (rectal temperature, heart rate, and respiratory rate) and the body weight were taken preoperatively, 7 and 14 days post-operatively. Dogs were euthanatized 14 days, postoperatively. The four techniques were evaluated for the procedure time, closure efficiency, postoperative complications, and histopathology.
first_indexed 2024-03-11T17:38:29Z
format Article
id doaj.art-16b125e65b07400ebd50965f048567a6
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2090-6269
2090-6277
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-11T17:38:29Z
publishDate 2023-06-01
publisher Assiut University
record_format Article
series Journal of Advanced Veterinary Research
spelling doaj.art-16b125e65b07400ebd50965f048567a62023-10-18T14:14:01ZengAssiut UniversityJournal of Advanced Veterinary Research2090-62692090-62772023-06-01135Comparison of Four Gastrotomy Closure Techniques in DogsRasha E. Abdelkader0Ahmed F. Ahmed1Sary Kh. Abd-elghaffar2Mohamed Semieka3Cardiology Hospital, Faculty of Medicine, Assiut University, Assiut 71526, Egypt.Department of Surgery, Anesthesiology and Radiology, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Assiut UniversityDepartment of Pathology and Clinical Pathology, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Assiut University, Assiut 71526, Egypt.Department of Surgery, Anesthesiology and Radiology, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Assiut University, Assiut 71526, Egypt. This study aimed to evaluate and compare four double-layer closure techniques for canine gastrotomy. Twenty adult clinically healthy mongrel dogs of both sexes were involved in the present study. Dogs were randomly allocated into four groups; A, B, C, and D (n=5 for each group) based on the used technique for gastrotomy closure. In group A, the first layer of the stomach wall (mucosa and submucosa) and the second layer (tunica muscularis and tunica serosa) were closed in simple continuous suture pattern. In group B, both layers were closed using inverting suture pattern. In group C, the first layer was closed by inverting suture pattern, while the second layer was closed by simple continuous suture pattern. In the group D, the first layer was closed by simple continuous suture pattern, while the second layer was closed by stabling using the skin staplers. Physiological parameters (rectal temperature, heart rate, and respiratory rate) and the body weight were taken preoperatively, 7 and 14 days post-operatively. Dogs were euthanatized 14 days, postoperatively. The four techniques were evaluated for the procedure time, closure efficiency, postoperative complications, and histopathology. https://advetresearch.com/index.php/AVR/article/view/1219Keywords: canine, gastrotomy, stomach, closure, suture, stapling
spellingShingle Rasha E. Abdelkader
Ahmed F. Ahmed
Sary Kh. Abd-elghaffar
Mohamed Semieka
Comparison of Four Gastrotomy Closure Techniques in Dogs
Journal of Advanced Veterinary Research
Keywords: canine, gastrotomy, stomach, closure, suture, stapling
title Comparison of Four Gastrotomy Closure Techniques in Dogs
title_full Comparison of Four Gastrotomy Closure Techniques in Dogs
title_fullStr Comparison of Four Gastrotomy Closure Techniques in Dogs
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of Four Gastrotomy Closure Techniques in Dogs
title_short Comparison of Four Gastrotomy Closure Techniques in Dogs
title_sort comparison of four gastrotomy closure techniques in dogs
topic Keywords: canine, gastrotomy, stomach, closure, suture, stapling
url https://advetresearch.com/index.php/AVR/article/view/1219
work_keys_str_mv AT rashaeabdelkader comparisonoffourgastrotomyclosuretechniquesindogs
AT ahmedfahmed comparisonoffourgastrotomyclosuretechniquesindogs
AT sarykhabdelghaffar comparisonoffourgastrotomyclosuretechniquesindogs
AT mohamedsemieka comparisonoffourgastrotomyclosuretechniquesindogs