Both movement-end and task-end are critical for error feedback in visuomotor adaptation: a behavioral experiment.

An important issue in motor learning/adaptation research is how the brain accepts the error information necessary for maintaining and improving task performance in a changing environment. The present study focuses on the effect of timing of error feedback. Previous research has demonstrated that ada...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Takumi Ishikawa, Yutaka Sakaguchi
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Public Library of Science (PLoS) 2013-01-01
Series:PLoS ONE
Online Access:http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC3564803?pdf=render
_version_ 1818013135157592064
author Takumi Ishikawa
Yutaka Sakaguchi
author_facet Takumi Ishikawa
Yutaka Sakaguchi
author_sort Takumi Ishikawa
collection DOAJ
description An important issue in motor learning/adaptation research is how the brain accepts the error information necessary for maintaining and improving task performance in a changing environment. The present study focuses on the effect of timing of error feedback. Previous research has demonstrated that adaptation to displacement of the visual field by prisms in a manual reaching task is significantly slowed by delayed visual feedback of the endpoint, suggesting that error feedback is most effective when given at the end of a movement. To further elucidate the brain mechanism by which error information is accepted in visuomotor adaptation, we tested whether error acceptance is linked to the end of a given task or to the end of an executed movement. We conducted a behavioral experiment using a virtual shooting task in which subjects controlled their wrist movements to meet a target with a cursor as accurately as possible. We manipulated the timing of visual feedback of the impact position so that it occurred either ahead of or behind the true time of impact. In another condition, the impact timing was explicitly indicated by an additional cue. The magnitude of the aftereffect significantly varied depending on the timing of feedback (p < 0.05, Friedman's Test). Interestingly, two distinct peaks of aftereffect were observed around movement-end and around task-end, irrespective of the existence of the timing cue. However, the peak around task-end was sharper when the timing cue was given. Our results demonstrate that the brain efficiently accepts error information at both movement-end and task-end, suggesting that two different learning mechanisms may underlie visuomotor transformation.
first_indexed 2024-04-14T06:29:33Z
format Article
id doaj.art-16bc28a19cbf43bc9784f39caeeb5816
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1932-6203
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-14T06:29:33Z
publishDate 2013-01-01
publisher Public Library of Science (PLoS)
record_format Article
series PLoS ONE
spelling doaj.art-16bc28a19cbf43bc9784f39caeeb58162022-12-22T02:07:40ZengPublic Library of Science (PLoS)PLoS ONE1932-62032013-01-0182e5580110.1371/journal.pone.0055801Both movement-end and task-end are critical for error feedback in visuomotor adaptation: a behavioral experiment.Takumi IshikawaYutaka SakaguchiAn important issue in motor learning/adaptation research is how the brain accepts the error information necessary for maintaining and improving task performance in a changing environment. The present study focuses on the effect of timing of error feedback. Previous research has demonstrated that adaptation to displacement of the visual field by prisms in a manual reaching task is significantly slowed by delayed visual feedback of the endpoint, suggesting that error feedback is most effective when given at the end of a movement. To further elucidate the brain mechanism by which error information is accepted in visuomotor adaptation, we tested whether error acceptance is linked to the end of a given task or to the end of an executed movement. We conducted a behavioral experiment using a virtual shooting task in which subjects controlled their wrist movements to meet a target with a cursor as accurately as possible. We manipulated the timing of visual feedback of the impact position so that it occurred either ahead of or behind the true time of impact. In another condition, the impact timing was explicitly indicated by an additional cue. The magnitude of the aftereffect significantly varied depending on the timing of feedback (p < 0.05, Friedman's Test). Interestingly, two distinct peaks of aftereffect were observed around movement-end and around task-end, irrespective of the existence of the timing cue. However, the peak around task-end was sharper when the timing cue was given. Our results demonstrate that the brain efficiently accepts error information at both movement-end and task-end, suggesting that two different learning mechanisms may underlie visuomotor transformation.http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC3564803?pdf=render
spellingShingle Takumi Ishikawa
Yutaka Sakaguchi
Both movement-end and task-end are critical for error feedback in visuomotor adaptation: a behavioral experiment.
PLoS ONE
title Both movement-end and task-end are critical for error feedback in visuomotor adaptation: a behavioral experiment.
title_full Both movement-end and task-end are critical for error feedback in visuomotor adaptation: a behavioral experiment.
title_fullStr Both movement-end and task-end are critical for error feedback in visuomotor adaptation: a behavioral experiment.
title_full_unstemmed Both movement-end and task-end are critical for error feedback in visuomotor adaptation: a behavioral experiment.
title_short Both movement-end and task-end are critical for error feedback in visuomotor adaptation: a behavioral experiment.
title_sort both movement end and task end are critical for error feedback in visuomotor adaptation a behavioral experiment
url http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC3564803?pdf=render
work_keys_str_mv AT takumiishikawa bothmovementendandtaskendarecriticalforerrorfeedbackinvisuomotoradaptationabehavioralexperiment
AT yutakasakaguchi bothmovementendandtaskendarecriticalforerrorfeedbackinvisuomotoradaptationabehavioralexperiment