Controlled Combustion and Pyrolysis of Waste Plastics: A Comparison Based on Human Health Risk Assessment

Increasing conditions of economic and social well-being have led to an increase in waste production. Among the waste products, a significant portion consists of plastic materials that are popular in the components of consumer goods. For this reason, the conversion of plastic to energy via controlled...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Arianna Moranda, Ombretta Paladino
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2023-04-01
Series:Recycling
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/2313-4321/8/2/38
_version_ 1797603712925958144
author Arianna Moranda
Ombretta Paladino
author_facet Arianna Moranda
Ombretta Paladino
author_sort Arianna Moranda
collection DOAJ
description Increasing conditions of economic and social well-being have led to an increase in waste production. Among the waste products, a significant portion consists of plastic materials that are popular in the components of consumer goods. For this reason, the conversion of plastic to energy via controlled combustion and plastic to fuel via thermal/catalytic pyrolysis or gasification can be proposed to treat the residual heterogeneous mixed plastics that cannot be recovered as individual polymers. The quality and type of fuels that are possible to obtain from these processes are different, as is the quality of their emissions, which generally contain VOCs, PCBs, dioxins, PAHs, and heavy metals. In this work, we propose a methodology based on human health risk assessment to compare controlled combustion and catalytic pyrolysis. Many pathways are analyzed, and pollutant concentrations are computed in the atmosphere, water, vegetables, fish, and food. Exposure is evaluated for inhalation and ingestion routes by taking into account uncertainties. Our results show that the risk profile of catalytic pyrolysis is low. Controlled combustion remains an interesting process, but even if Best Available Technologies (BAT) are adopted, the cancer risk due to PAHs contained in particulate is around the threshold for people living near the plant if a long period of operation is considered.
first_indexed 2024-03-11T04:35:39Z
format Article
id doaj.art-16bfd4d6be9745328c54ba8e6f628d0a
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2313-4321
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-11T04:35:39Z
publishDate 2023-04-01
publisher MDPI AG
record_format Article
series Recycling
spelling doaj.art-16bfd4d6be9745328c54ba8e6f628d0a2023-11-17T21:08:02ZengMDPI AGRecycling2313-43212023-04-01823810.3390/recycling8020038Controlled Combustion and Pyrolysis of Waste Plastics: A Comparison Based on Human Health Risk AssessmentArianna Moranda0Ombretta Paladino1DICCA—Dipartimento di Ingegneria Civile, Chimica ed Ambientale, Università di Genova, Via Opera Pia 15, 16145 Genova, ItalyDICCA—Dipartimento di Ingegneria Civile, Chimica ed Ambientale, Università di Genova, Via Opera Pia 15, 16145 Genova, ItalyIncreasing conditions of economic and social well-being have led to an increase in waste production. Among the waste products, a significant portion consists of plastic materials that are popular in the components of consumer goods. For this reason, the conversion of plastic to energy via controlled combustion and plastic to fuel via thermal/catalytic pyrolysis or gasification can be proposed to treat the residual heterogeneous mixed plastics that cannot be recovered as individual polymers. The quality and type of fuels that are possible to obtain from these processes are different, as is the quality of their emissions, which generally contain VOCs, PCBs, dioxins, PAHs, and heavy metals. In this work, we propose a methodology based on human health risk assessment to compare controlled combustion and catalytic pyrolysis. Many pathways are analyzed, and pollutant concentrations are computed in the atmosphere, water, vegetables, fish, and food. Exposure is evaluated for inhalation and ingestion routes by taking into account uncertainties. Our results show that the risk profile of catalytic pyrolysis is low. Controlled combustion remains an interesting process, but even if Best Available Technologies (BAT) are adopted, the cancer risk due to PAHs contained in particulate is around the threshold for people living near the plant if a long period of operation is considered.https://www.mdpi.com/2313-4321/8/2/38catalytic pyrolysiscontrolled combustionplastic wastetoxic riskcancer riskdioxins
spellingShingle Arianna Moranda
Ombretta Paladino
Controlled Combustion and Pyrolysis of Waste Plastics: A Comparison Based on Human Health Risk Assessment
Recycling
catalytic pyrolysis
controlled combustion
plastic waste
toxic risk
cancer risk
dioxins
title Controlled Combustion and Pyrolysis of Waste Plastics: A Comparison Based on Human Health Risk Assessment
title_full Controlled Combustion and Pyrolysis of Waste Plastics: A Comparison Based on Human Health Risk Assessment
title_fullStr Controlled Combustion and Pyrolysis of Waste Plastics: A Comparison Based on Human Health Risk Assessment
title_full_unstemmed Controlled Combustion and Pyrolysis of Waste Plastics: A Comparison Based on Human Health Risk Assessment
title_short Controlled Combustion and Pyrolysis of Waste Plastics: A Comparison Based on Human Health Risk Assessment
title_sort controlled combustion and pyrolysis of waste plastics a comparison based on human health risk assessment
topic catalytic pyrolysis
controlled combustion
plastic waste
toxic risk
cancer risk
dioxins
url https://www.mdpi.com/2313-4321/8/2/38
work_keys_str_mv AT ariannamoranda controlledcombustionandpyrolysisofwasteplasticsacomparisonbasedonhumanhealthriskassessment
AT ombrettapaladino controlledcombustionandpyrolysisofwasteplasticsacomparisonbasedonhumanhealthriskassessment