Comparison study of COSMIC RO dry-air climatologies based on average profile inversion

<p>Global Navigation Satellite System (GNSS) radio occultation (RO) data enable the retrieval of near-vertical profiles of atmospheric parameters like bending angle, refractivity, pressure, and temperature. The retrieval step from bending angle to refractivity, however, involves an Abel int...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: J. Danzer, M. Schwärz, V. Proschek, U. Foelsche, H. Gleisner
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Copernicus Publications 2018-08-01
Series:Atmospheric Measurement Techniques
Online Access:https://www.atmos-meas-tech.net/11/4867/2018/amt-11-4867-2018.pdf
_version_ 1831751924870807552
author J. Danzer
J. Danzer
M. Schwärz
M. Schwärz
V. Proschek
V. Proschek
U. Foelsche
U. Foelsche
H. Gleisner
author_facet J. Danzer
J. Danzer
M. Schwärz
M. Schwärz
V. Proschek
V. Proschek
U. Foelsche
U. Foelsche
H. Gleisner
author_sort J. Danzer
collection DOAJ
description <p>Global Navigation Satellite System (GNSS) radio occultation (RO) data enable the retrieval of near-vertical profiles of atmospheric parameters like bending angle, refractivity, pressure, and temperature. The retrieval step from bending angle to refractivity, however, involves an Abel integral with an upper limit of infinity. RO data are practically limited to altitudes below about 80&thinsp;km and the observed bending angle profiles show decreasing signal-to-noise ratio with increasing altitude. Some kind of high-altitude background data are therefore needed in order to perform this retrieval step (this approach is known as high-altitude initialization). Any bias in the background data will affect all RO data products beyond bending angle. A reduction of the influence of the background is therefore desirable – in particular for climate applications.</p><p>Recently a new approach for the production of GNSS radio occultation climatologies has been proposed. The idea is to perform the averaging of individual profiles in bending angle space and then propagate the mean bending angle profiles through the Abel transform. Climatological products of refractivity, density, pressure, and temperature are directly retrieved from the mean bending angles.</p><p>The averaging of a large number of profiles suppresses noise in the data, enabling observed bending angle data to be used up to 80&thinsp;km without the need for a priori information. Some background information for the Abel integral is still necessary above 80&thinsp;km.</p><p>This work is a follow-up study, having the focus on the comparison of the average profile inversion climatologies (API) from the two processing centers WEGC and DMI, which study monthly COSMIC (Constellation Observing System for Meteorology, Ionosphere, and Climate) data from January to March 2011. The impact of different backgrounds above 80&thinsp;km is tested, and different implementations of the Abel integral are investigated. Results are compared for the climatological products with ECMWF analyses, MIPAS, and SABER data.</p><p>It is shown that different implementations of the Abel integral have little impact on the API climatologies. On the other hand, different extrapolations of the bending angle profile above 80&thinsp;km play a key role in the resulting monthly mean refractivities above 35&thinsp;km in altitude. Below that respective altitude the API climatologies show a good agreement between the two processing centers WEGC and DMI. Due to the downward propagation within the retrieval, effects of the high-altitude initialization lead to differences in dry-temperature climatologies down to 20&thinsp;km in altitude.</p><p>When applying an exponential extrapolation to the bending angles above 80&thinsp;km at both centers, the dry-temperature climatologies agree among WEGC, DMI, ECMWF analysis, and MIPAS up to 35&thinsp;km in altitude within ±0.5&thinsp;K and up to 40&thinsp;km in altitude within ±1&thinsp;K. We conclude that the API retrieval is a valid approach up to the lower stratosphere. It is a computationally efficient alternative method for producing dry atmospheric RO climatologies.</p>
first_indexed 2024-12-21T22:54:23Z
format Article
id doaj.art-16c9629baa6b4cb0a57103e527b6b66a
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1867-1381
1867-8548
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-21T22:54:23Z
publishDate 2018-08-01
publisher Copernicus Publications
record_format Article
series Atmospheric Measurement Techniques
spelling doaj.art-16c9629baa6b4cb0a57103e527b6b66a2022-12-21T18:47:29ZengCopernicus PublicationsAtmospheric Measurement Techniques1867-13811867-85482018-08-01114867488210.5194/amt-11-4867-2018Comparison study of COSMIC RO dry-air climatologies based on average profile inversionJ. Danzer0J. Danzer1M. Schwärz2M. Schwärz3V. Proschek4V. Proschek5U. Foelsche6U. Foelsche7H. Gleisner8Wegener Center for Climate and Global Change (WEGC), University of Graz, Graz, AustriaInstitute for Geophysics, Astrophysics, and Meteorology/Institute of Physics (IGAM/IP), University of Graz, Graz, AustriaWegener Center for Climate and Global Change (WEGC), University of Graz, Graz, AustriaInstitute for Geophysics, Astrophysics, and Meteorology/Institute of Physics (IGAM/IP), University of Graz, Graz, AustriaWegener Center for Climate and Global Change (WEGC), University of Graz, Graz, AustriaInstitute for Geophysics, Astrophysics, and Meteorology/Institute of Physics (IGAM/IP), University of Graz, Graz, AustriaWegener Center for Climate and Global Change (WEGC), University of Graz, Graz, AustriaInstitute for Geophysics, Astrophysics, and Meteorology/Institute of Physics (IGAM/IP), University of Graz, Graz, AustriaDanish Meteorological Institute (DMI), Copenhagen, Denmark<p>Global Navigation Satellite System (GNSS) radio occultation (RO) data enable the retrieval of near-vertical profiles of atmospheric parameters like bending angle, refractivity, pressure, and temperature. The retrieval step from bending angle to refractivity, however, involves an Abel integral with an upper limit of infinity. RO data are practically limited to altitudes below about 80&thinsp;km and the observed bending angle profiles show decreasing signal-to-noise ratio with increasing altitude. Some kind of high-altitude background data are therefore needed in order to perform this retrieval step (this approach is known as high-altitude initialization). Any bias in the background data will affect all RO data products beyond bending angle. A reduction of the influence of the background is therefore desirable – in particular for climate applications.</p><p>Recently a new approach for the production of GNSS radio occultation climatologies has been proposed. The idea is to perform the averaging of individual profiles in bending angle space and then propagate the mean bending angle profiles through the Abel transform. Climatological products of refractivity, density, pressure, and temperature are directly retrieved from the mean bending angles.</p><p>The averaging of a large number of profiles suppresses noise in the data, enabling observed bending angle data to be used up to 80&thinsp;km without the need for a priori information. Some background information for the Abel integral is still necessary above 80&thinsp;km.</p><p>This work is a follow-up study, having the focus on the comparison of the average profile inversion climatologies (API) from the two processing centers WEGC and DMI, which study monthly COSMIC (Constellation Observing System for Meteorology, Ionosphere, and Climate) data from January to March 2011. The impact of different backgrounds above 80&thinsp;km is tested, and different implementations of the Abel integral are investigated. Results are compared for the climatological products with ECMWF analyses, MIPAS, and SABER data.</p><p>It is shown that different implementations of the Abel integral have little impact on the API climatologies. On the other hand, different extrapolations of the bending angle profile above 80&thinsp;km play a key role in the resulting monthly mean refractivities above 35&thinsp;km in altitude. Below that respective altitude the API climatologies show a good agreement between the two processing centers WEGC and DMI. Due to the downward propagation within the retrieval, effects of the high-altitude initialization lead to differences in dry-temperature climatologies down to 20&thinsp;km in altitude.</p><p>When applying an exponential extrapolation to the bending angles above 80&thinsp;km at both centers, the dry-temperature climatologies agree among WEGC, DMI, ECMWF analysis, and MIPAS up to 35&thinsp;km in altitude within ±0.5&thinsp;K and up to 40&thinsp;km in altitude within ±1&thinsp;K. We conclude that the API retrieval is a valid approach up to the lower stratosphere. It is a computationally efficient alternative method for producing dry atmospheric RO climatologies.</p>https://www.atmos-meas-tech.net/11/4867/2018/amt-11-4867-2018.pdf
spellingShingle J. Danzer
J. Danzer
M. Schwärz
M. Schwärz
V. Proschek
V. Proschek
U. Foelsche
U. Foelsche
H. Gleisner
Comparison study of COSMIC RO dry-air climatologies based on average profile inversion
Atmospheric Measurement Techniques
title Comparison study of COSMIC RO dry-air climatologies based on average profile inversion
title_full Comparison study of COSMIC RO dry-air climatologies based on average profile inversion
title_fullStr Comparison study of COSMIC RO dry-air climatologies based on average profile inversion
title_full_unstemmed Comparison study of COSMIC RO dry-air climatologies based on average profile inversion
title_short Comparison study of COSMIC RO dry-air climatologies based on average profile inversion
title_sort comparison study of cosmic ro dry air climatologies based on average profile inversion
url https://www.atmos-meas-tech.net/11/4867/2018/amt-11-4867-2018.pdf
work_keys_str_mv AT jdanzer comparisonstudyofcosmicrodryairclimatologiesbasedonaverageprofileinversion
AT jdanzer comparisonstudyofcosmicrodryairclimatologiesbasedonaverageprofileinversion
AT mschwarz comparisonstudyofcosmicrodryairclimatologiesbasedonaverageprofileinversion
AT mschwarz comparisonstudyofcosmicrodryairclimatologiesbasedonaverageprofileinversion
AT vproschek comparisonstudyofcosmicrodryairclimatologiesbasedonaverageprofileinversion
AT vproschek comparisonstudyofcosmicrodryairclimatologiesbasedonaverageprofileinversion
AT ufoelsche comparisonstudyofcosmicrodryairclimatologiesbasedonaverageprofileinversion
AT ufoelsche comparisonstudyofcosmicrodryairclimatologiesbasedonaverageprofileinversion
AT hgleisner comparisonstudyofcosmicrodryairclimatologiesbasedonaverageprofileinversion