Comparing Methods for Overseeding Winter Rye into Standing Soybean
Core Ideas Several methods of overseeding a winter rye cover crop into soybean were tested. Tractor‐mounted seeders reduced soybean yield by 4% relative to an aerial seeder. Each seeder was equally variable across the seeding path with an average CV of 34%. Rye growth was influenced by weather and p...
| Main Authors: | , , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Wiley
2019-01-01
|
| Series: | Agrosystems, Geosciences & Environment |
| Online Access: | https://doi.org/10.2134/age2019.04.0023 |
| _version_ | 1811235331862691840 |
|---|---|
| author | Melissa L. Wilson Deborah L. Allan John M. Baker Paulo H. Pagliari |
| author_facet | Melissa L. Wilson Deborah L. Allan John M. Baker Paulo H. Pagliari |
| author_sort | Melissa L. Wilson |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | Core Ideas Several methods of overseeding a winter rye cover crop into soybean were tested. Tractor‐mounted seeders reduced soybean yield by 4% relative to an aerial seeder. Each seeder was equally variable across the seeding path with an average CV of 34%. Rye growth was influenced by weather and possibly by seeding density (a covariate). Seeding rate and timing may be more important factors than choice of equipment. In the upper Midwest, short growing seasons make it difficult to establish cover crops in corn (Zea mays L.)–soybean [Glycine max (L.) Merr.] rotations. Overseeding before cash crop harvest may allow more time for growth, but practical methods need to be evaluated. Over 2 yr, this study assessed three winter rye (Secale cereale L.) overseeding techniques into standing soybean in mid‐September: aerial seeding (AS), tractor‐mounted air‐flow spreader (TAF), and tractor‐mounted fertilizer broadcast spreader (TBS). All treatments had equal variability in seeding density across plots. When rye was overseeded using the TAF and TBS treatments, soybean yield was reduced by approximately 4% relative to the AS treatment. In spring, seeding treatments impacted aboveground biomass production and N uptake in a year with good growing conditions (2010–2011), but not in a year with poor growth conditions (2011–2012). The impact of seeding method in the first year of the study was more likely due to differences in seeding density of the treatments, which was used as a covariate in this study. In a year with good growing conditions, the treatments with lower seeding densities had more spring biomass production, likely due to compensatory growth. Overall, measured values of aboveground biomass ranged from 39 to 467 kg ha−1, whereas aboveground N uptake ranged from 2.1 to 15.3 kg ha−1. Based on these findings, research efforts should focus on evaluating optimal seeding rates and timing, rather than choice of seeding method, to reduce impact on soybean yields and maximize cover crop benefits. |
| first_indexed | 2024-04-12T11:50:10Z |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj.art-16d7952691b440d5a60c972b06578ca2 |
| institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
| issn | 2639-6696 |
| language | English |
| last_indexed | 2024-04-12T11:50:10Z |
| publishDate | 2019-01-01 |
| publisher | Wiley |
| record_format | Article |
| series | Agrosystems, Geosciences & Environment |
| spelling | doaj.art-16d7952691b440d5a60c972b06578ca22022-12-22T03:34:12ZengWileyAgrosystems, Geosciences & Environment2639-66962019-01-01211710.2134/age2019.04.0023Comparing Methods for Overseeding Winter Rye into Standing SoybeanMelissa L. Wilson0Deborah L. Allan1John M. Baker2Paulo H. Pagliari3Univ. of MinnesotaDep. of Soil, Water, and Climate1991 Upper Buford CircleSaint PaulMN55108Univ. of MinnesotaDep. of Soil, Water, and Climate1991 Upper Buford CircleSaint PaulMN55108USDA‐ARS1991 Upper Buford CircleSaint PaulMN55108Univ. of MinnesotaSouthwestern Research and Outreach Center23669 130th StreetLambertonMN56152Core Ideas Several methods of overseeding a winter rye cover crop into soybean were tested. Tractor‐mounted seeders reduced soybean yield by 4% relative to an aerial seeder. Each seeder was equally variable across the seeding path with an average CV of 34%. Rye growth was influenced by weather and possibly by seeding density (a covariate). Seeding rate and timing may be more important factors than choice of equipment. In the upper Midwest, short growing seasons make it difficult to establish cover crops in corn (Zea mays L.)–soybean [Glycine max (L.) Merr.] rotations. Overseeding before cash crop harvest may allow more time for growth, but practical methods need to be evaluated. Over 2 yr, this study assessed three winter rye (Secale cereale L.) overseeding techniques into standing soybean in mid‐September: aerial seeding (AS), tractor‐mounted air‐flow spreader (TAF), and tractor‐mounted fertilizer broadcast spreader (TBS). All treatments had equal variability in seeding density across plots. When rye was overseeded using the TAF and TBS treatments, soybean yield was reduced by approximately 4% relative to the AS treatment. In spring, seeding treatments impacted aboveground biomass production and N uptake in a year with good growing conditions (2010–2011), but not in a year with poor growth conditions (2011–2012). The impact of seeding method in the first year of the study was more likely due to differences in seeding density of the treatments, which was used as a covariate in this study. In a year with good growing conditions, the treatments with lower seeding densities had more spring biomass production, likely due to compensatory growth. Overall, measured values of aboveground biomass ranged from 39 to 467 kg ha−1, whereas aboveground N uptake ranged from 2.1 to 15.3 kg ha−1. Based on these findings, research efforts should focus on evaluating optimal seeding rates and timing, rather than choice of seeding method, to reduce impact on soybean yields and maximize cover crop benefits.https://doi.org/10.2134/age2019.04.0023 |
| spellingShingle | Melissa L. Wilson Deborah L. Allan John M. Baker Paulo H. Pagliari Comparing Methods for Overseeding Winter Rye into Standing Soybean Agrosystems, Geosciences & Environment |
| title | Comparing Methods for Overseeding Winter Rye into Standing Soybean |
| title_full | Comparing Methods for Overseeding Winter Rye into Standing Soybean |
| title_fullStr | Comparing Methods for Overseeding Winter Rye into Standing Soybean |
| title_full_unstemmed | Comparing Methods for Overseeding Winter Rye into Standing Soybean |
| title_short | Comparing Methods for Overseeding Winter Rye into Standing Soybean |
| title_sort | comparing methods for overseeding winter rye into standing soybean |
| url | https://doi.org/10.2134/age2019.04.0023 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT melissalwilson comparingmethodsforoverseedingwinterryeintostandingsoybean AT deborahlallan comparingmethodsforoverseedingwinterryeintostandingsoybean AT johnmbaker comparingmethodsforoverseedingwinterryeintostandingsoybean AT paulohpagliari comparingmethodsforoverseedingwinterryeintostandingsoybean |