A comparison of automated urine analyzers cobas 6500, UN 3000-111b and iRICELL 3000 with manual microscopic urinalysis

Objectives: Microscopic examination is essential in urine analysis. This is a simple way to collect informative data but it is also labor-intensive, time-consuming, and requires experienced staff for accurate results and interpretation. Several automated urine analyzers have been introduced for urin...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Piraya Tantisaranon, Kanyarat Dumkengkhachornwong, Peechana Aiadsakun, Areerat Hnoonual
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Elsevier 2021-03-01
Series:Practical Laboratory Medicine
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352551721000032
_version_ 1818576004998758400
author Piraya Tantisaranon
Kanyarat Dumkengkhachornwong
Peechana Aiadsakun
Areerat Hnoonual
author_facet Piraya Tantisaranon
Kanyarat Dumkengkhachornwong
Peechana Aiadsakun
Areerat Hnoonual
author_sort Piraya Tantisaranon
collection DOAJ
description Objectives: Microscopic examination is essential in urine analysis. This is a simple way to collect informative data but it is also labor-intensive, time-consuming, and requires experienced staff for accurate results and interpretation. Several automated urine analyzers have been introduced for urine analysis in medical laboratories. The aim of this study was to assess and compare the performance of the most common three automated urine analyzers, Cobas 6500, UN3000-111b and iRICELL 3000. Methods: A total of 100 routine urine samples were used in the study. Results from the three machines were compared with the routine procedure results including physical, chemical and sediment analysis. Results: There was good correlation of urine physical and chemical analyses between the three analyzers with an overall concordance level of more than 80%. For sediment analysis, the degree of concordance between manual analysis and the three instruments was very good to good for white blood cells, red blood cells and epithelial cells, and moderate for bacteria. There were fair to good agreements between manual microscopy and the three instruments, Cobas 6500, UN3000-111b and iRICELL 3000, for casts (Cohen’s kappa 0.42, 0.38 and 0.62, respectively). Conclusions: The three automated urine analyzers showed similar performances and good correlation with manual microscopy. The results of this study indicate that automated urine analyzers could be used for initial urine testing to reduce high workloads and to save time, but manual microscopic analysis by experienced staff is still necessary to classify urine sediments for confirmation, especially in pathologic specimens.
first_indexed 2024-12-15T00:48:30Z
format Article
id doaj.art-16e11f45882149cba2151c2f5cd21c6f
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2352-5517
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-15T00:48:30Z
publishDate 2021-03-01
publisher Elsevier
record_format Article
series Practical Laboratory Medicine
spelling doaj.art-16e11f45882149cba2151c2f5cd21c6f2022-12-21T22:41:29ZengElsevierPractical Laboratory Medicine2352-55172021-03-0124e00203A comparison of automated urine analyzers cobas 6500, UN 3000-111b and iRICELL 3000 with manual microscopic urinalysisPiraya Tantisaranon0Kanyarat Dumkengkhachornwong1Peechana Aiadsakun2Areerat Hnoonual3Emergency Laboratory, Department of Pathology, Faculty of Medicine, Prince of Songkla University, Songkhla, ThailandEmergency Laboratory, Department of Pathology, Faculty of Medicine, Prince of Songkla University, Songkhla, ThailandClinical Microscopy Laboratory, Department of Pathology, Faculty of Medicine, Prince of Songkla University, Songkhla, ThailandDivision of Human Genetics, Department of Pathology, Faculty of Medicine, Prince of Songkla University, Songkhla, Thailand; Corresponding author. Division of Human Genetics, Department of Pathology, Faculty of Medicine, Prince of Songkla University, Hat Yai, Songkhla, 90110, Thailand.,Objectives: Microscopic examination is essential in urine analysis. This is a simple way to collect informative data but it is also labor-intensive, time-consuming, and requires experienced staff for accurate results and interpretation. Several automated urine analyzers have been introduced for urine analysis in medical laboratories. The aim of this study was to assess and compare the performance of the most common three automated urine analyzers, Cobas 6500, UN3000-111b and iRICELL 3000. Methods: A total of 100 routine urine samples were used in the study. Results from the three machines were compared with the routine procedure results including physical, chemical and sediment analysis. Results: There was good correlation of urine physical and chemical analyses between the three analyzers with an overall concordance level of more than 80%. For sediment analysis, the degree of concordance between manual analysis and the three instruments was very good to good for white blood cells, red blood cells and epithelial cells, and moderate for bacteria. There were fair to good agreements between manual microscopy and the three instruments, Cobas 6500, UN3000-111b and iRICELL 3000, for casts (Cohen’s kappa 0.42, 0.38 and 0.62, respectively). Conclusions: The three automated urine analyzers showed similar performances and good correlation with manual microscopy. The results of this study indicate that automated urine analyzers could be used for initial urine testing to reduce high workloads and to save time, but manual microscopic analysis by experienced staff is still necessary to classify urine sediments for confirmation, especially in pathologic specimens.http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352551721000032Urine sedimentAutomated urine analyzerMicroscopicUrinalysis
spellingShingle Piraya Tantisaranon
Kanyarat Dumkengkhachornwong
Peechana Aiadsakun
Areerat Hnoonual
A comparison of automated urine analyzers cobas 6500, UN 3000-111b and iRICELL 3000 with manual microscopic urinalysis
Practical Laboratory Medicine
Urine sediment
Automated urine analyzer
Microscopic
Urinalysis
title A comparison of automated urine analyzers cobas 6500, UN 3000-111b and iRICELL 3000 with manual microscopic urinalysis
title_full A comparison of automated urine analyzers cobas 6500, UN 3000-111b and iRICELL 3000 with manual microscopic urinalysis
title_fullStr A comparison of automated urine analyzers cobas 6500, UN 3000-111b and iRICELL 3000 with manual microscopic urinalysis
title_full_unstemmed A comparison of automated urine analyzers cobas 6500, UN 3000-111b and iRICELL 3000 with manual microscopic urinalysis
title_short A comparison of automated urine analyzers cobas 6500, UN 3000-111b and iRICELL 3000 with manual microscopic urinalysis
title_sort comparison of automated urine analyzers cobas 6500 un 3000 111b and iricell 3000 with manual microscopic urinalysis
topic Urine sediment
Automated urine analyzer
Microscopic
Urinalysis
url http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352551721000032
work_keys_str_mv AT pirayatantisaranon acomparisonofautomatedurineanalyzerscobas6500un3000111bandiricell3000withmanualmicroscopicurinalysis
AT kanyaratdumkengkhachornwong acomparisonofautomatedurineanalyzerscobas6500un3000111bandiricell3000withmanualmicroscopicurinalysis
AT peechanaaiadsakun acomparisonofautomatedurineanalyzerscobas6500un3000111bandiricell3000withmanualmicroscopicurinalysis
AT areerathnoonual acomparisonofautomatedurineanalyzerscobas6500un3000111bandiricell3000withmanualmicroscopicurinalysis
AT pirayatantisaranon comparisonofautomatedurineanalyzerscobas6500un3000111bandiricell3000withmanualmicroscopicurinalysis
AT kanyaratdumkengkhachornwong comparisonofautomatedurineanalyzerscobas6500un3000111bandiricell3000withmanualmicroscopicurinalysis
AT peechanaaiadsakun comparisonofautomatedurineanalyzerscobas6500un3000111bandiricell3000withmanualmicroscopicurinalysis
AT areerathnoonual comparisonofautomatedurineanalyzerscobas6500un3000111bandiricell3000withmanualmicroscopicurinalysis