Non-antibiotic Approaches for Disease Prevention and Control in Nursery Pigs: A Scoping Review
Swine producers are encouraged to practice antibiotic stewardship by reducing their use of antibiotics belonging to classes of medical importance to humans. We conducted a scoping review of non-antibiotic approaches in the form of products or management practices that might prevent or control diseas...
Main Authors: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2021-04-01
|
Series: | Frontiers in Veterinary Science |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fvets.2021.620347/full |
_version_ | 1819081524583071744 |
---|---|
author | Lee V. Wisener Lee V. Wisener Jan M. Sargeant Jan M. Sargeant Terri L. O'Sullivan Annette M. O'Connor Scott A. McEwen Mark Reist Katheryn J. Churchill |
author_facet | Lee V. Wisener Lee V. Wisener Jan M. Sargeant Jan M. Sargeant Terri L. O'Sullivan Annette M. O'Connor Scott A. McEwen Mark Reist Katheryn J. Churchill |
author_sort | Lee V. Wisener |
collection | DOAJ |
description | Swine producers are encouraged to practice antibiotic stewardship by reducing their use of antibiotics belonging to classes of medical importance to humans. We conducted a scoping review of non-antibiotic approaches in the form of products or management practices that might prevent or control disease and thus reduce the need for antibiotics in nursery pigs. Our objectives were to systematically describe the research on this broad topic for the North American context, identify specific topics that could feasibly support systematic reviews, and identify knowledge gaps. A search of multiple databases identified 11,316 articles and proceedings for relevance screening. From these, 441 eligible clinical trials and observational studies were charted. The majority were clinical trials (94%). Study results from EU countries were mostly communicated through journal articles, whereas study results from the USA were mostly communicated through conference proceedings. Interventions and health outcomes were diverse. The two most frequent intervention categories were feed additives and piglet vaccines. The three most frequent outcomes reported were diarrhea, mortality, and indices of vaccine immunity. There were 13 specific topics comprising various feed additives and vaccines that might feasibly support systematic reviews. There were relatively few studies in which interventions were compared with antibiotic comparison groups and relatively few studies evaluating management practices. |
first_indexed | 2024-12-21T20:02:09Z |
format | Article |
id | doaj.art-16e51f31c4194ccaa2b4ceb067fdef7e |
institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
issn | 2297-1769 |
language | English |
last_indexed | 2024-12-21T20:02:09Z |
publishDate | 2021-04-01 |
publisher | Frontiers Media S.A. |
record_format | Article |
series | Frontiers in Veterinary Science |
spelling | doaj.art-16e51f31c4194ccaa2b4ceb067fdef7e2022-12-21T18:51:57ZengFrontiers Media S.A.Frontiers in Veterinary Science2297-17692021-04-01810.3389/fvets.2021.620347620347Non-antibiotic Approaches for Disease Prevention and Control in Nursery Pigs: A Scoping ReviewLee V. Wisener0Lee V. Wisener1Jan M. Sargeant2Jan M. Sargeant3Terri L. O'Sullivan4Annette M. O'Connor5Scott A. McEwen6Mark Reist7Katheryn J. Churchill8Department of Population Medicine, Ontario Veterinary College, University of Guelph, Guelph, ON, CanadaCentre for Public Health and Zoonoses, University of Guelph, Guelph, ON, CanadaDepartment of Population Medicine, Ontario Veterinary College, University of Guelph, Guelph, ON, CanadaCentre for Public Health and Zoonoses, University of Guelph, Guelph, ON, CanadaDepartment of Population Medicine, Ontario Veterinary College, University of Guelph, Guelph, ON, CanadaDepartment of Large Animal Clinical Sciences, College of Veterinary Medicine, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI, United StatesDepartment of Population Medicine, Ontario Veterinary College, University of Guelph, Guelph, ON, CanadaDepartment of Population Medicine, Ontario Veterinary College, University of Guelph, Guelph, ON, CanadaDepartment of Population Medicine, Ontario Veterinary College, University of Guelph, Guelph, ON, CanadaSwine producers are encouraged to practice antibiotic stewardship by reducing their use of antibiotics belonging to classes of medical importance to humans. We conducted a scoping review of non-antibiotic approaches in the form of products or management practices that might prevent or control disease and thus reduce the need for antibiotics in nursery pigs. Our objectives were to systematically describe the research on this broad topic for the North American context, identify specific topics that could feasibly support systematic reviews, and identify knowledge gaps. A search of multiple databases identified 11,316 articles and proceedings for relevance screening. From these, 441 eligible clinical trials and observational studies were charted. The majority were clinical trials (94%). Study results from EU countries were mostly communicated through journal articles, whereas study results from the USA were mostly communicated through conference proceedings. Interventions and health outcomes were diverse. The two most frequent intervention categories were feed additives and piglet vaccines. The three most frequent outcomes reported were diarrhea, mortality, and indices of vaccine immunity. There were 13 specific topics comprising various feed additives and vaccines that might feasibly support systematic reviews. There were relatively few studies in which interventions were compared with antibiotic comparison groups and relatively few studies evaluating management practices.https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fvets.2021.620347/fullantibiotic stewardshipdisease controldisease preventionnon-antibioic approachesnursery pigsscoping review |
spellingShingle | Lee V. Wisener Lee V. Wisener Jan M. Sargeant Jan M. Sargeant Terri L. O'Sullivan Annette M. O'Connor Scott A. McEwen Mark Reist Katheryn J. Churchill Non-antibiotic Approaches for Disease Prevention and Control in Nursery Pigs: A Scoping Review Frontiers in Veterinary Science antibiotic stewardship disease control disease prevention non-antibioic approaches nursery pigs scoping review |
title | Non-antibiotic Approaches for Disease Prevention and Control in Nursery Pigs: A Scoping Review |
title_full | Non-antibiotic Approaches for Disease Prevention and Control in Nursery Pigs: A Scoping Review |
title_fullStr | Non-antibiotic Approaches for Disease Prevention and Control in Nursery Pigs: A Scoping Review |
title_full_unstemmed | Non-antibiotic Approaches for Disease Prevention and Control in Nursery Pigs: A Scoping Review |
title_short | Non-antibiotic Approaches for Disease Prevention and Control in Nursery Pigs: A Scoping Review |
title_sort | non antibiotic approaches for disease prevention and control in nursery pigs a scoping review |
topic | antibiotic stewardship disease control disease prevention non-antibioic approaches nursery pigs scoping review |
url | https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fvets.2021.620347/full |
work_keys_str_mv | AT leevwisener nonantibioticapproachesfordiseasepreventionandcontrolinnurserypigsascopingreview AT leevwisener nonantibioticapproachesfordiseasepreventionandcontrolinnurserypigsascopingreview AT janmsargeant nonantibioticapproachesfordiseasepreventionandcontrolinnurserypigsascopingreview AT janmsargeant nonantibioticapproachesfordiseasepreventionandcontrolinnurserypigsascopingreview AT terrilosullivan nonantibioticapproachesfordiseasepreventionandcontrolinnurserypigsascopingreview AT annettemoconnor nonantibioticapproachesfordiseasepreventionandcontrolinnurserypigsascopingreview AT scottamcewen nonantibioticapproachesfordiseasepreventionandcontrolinnurserypigsascopingreview AT markreist nonantibioticapproachesfordiseasepreventionandcontrolinnurserypigsascopingreview AT katherynjchurchill nonantibioticapproachesfordiseasepreventionandcontrolinnurserypigsascopingreview |