Non-antibiotic Approaches for Disease Prevention and Control in Nursery Pigs: A Scoping Review

Swine producers are encouraged to practice antibiotic stewardship by reducing their use of antibiotics belonging to classes of medical importance to humans. We conducted a scoping review of non-antibiotic approaches in the form of products or management practices that might prevent or control diseas...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Lee V. Wisener, Jan M. Sargeant, Terri L. O'Sullivan, Annette M. O'Connor, Scott A. McEwen, Mark Reist, Katheryn J. Churchill
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Frontiers Media S.A. 2021-04-01
Series:Frontiers in Veterinary Science
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fvets.2021.620347/full
_version_ 1819081524583071744
author Lee V. Wisener
Lee V. Wisener
Jan M. Sargeant
Jan M. Sargeant
Terri L. O'Sullivan
Annette M. O'Connor
Scott A. McEwen
Mark Reist
Katheryn J. Churchill
author_facet Lee V. Wisener
Lee V. Wisener
Jan M. Sargeant
Jan M. Sargeant
Terri L. O'Sullivan
Annette M. O'Connor
Scott A. McEwen
Mark Reist
Katheryn J. Churchill
author_sort Lee V. Wisener
collection DOAJ
description Swine producers are encouraged to practice antibiotic stewardship by reducing their use of antibiotics belonging to classes of medical importance to humans. We conducted a scoping review of non-antibiotic approaches in the form of products or management practices that might prevent or control disease and thus reduce the need for antibiotics in nursery pigs. Our objectives were to systematically describe the research on this broad topic for the North American context, identify specific topics that could feasibly support systematic reviews, and identify knowledge gaps. A search of multiple databases identified 11,316 articles and proceedings for relevance screening. From these, 441 eligible clinical trials and observational studies were charted. The majority were clinical trials (94%). Study results from EU countries were mostly communicated through journal articles, whereas study results from the USA were mostly communicated through conference proceedings. Interventions and health outcomes were diverse. The two most frequent intervention categories were feed additives and piglet vaccines. The three most frequent outcomes reported were diarrhea, mortality, and indices of vaccine immunity. There were 13 specific topics comprising various feed additives and vaccines that might feasibly support systematic reviews. There were relatively few studies in which interventions were compared with antibiotic comparison groups and relatively few studies evaluating management practices.
first_indexed 2024-12-21T20:02:09Z
format Article
id doaj.art-16e51f31c4194ccaa2b4ceb067fdef7e
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2297-1769
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-21T20:02:09Z
publishDate 2021-04-01
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format Article
series Frontiers in Veterinary Science
spelling doaj.art-16e51f31c4194ccaa2b4ceb067fdef7e2022-12-21T18:51:57ZengFrontiers Media S.A.Frontiers in Veterinary Science2297-17692021-04-01810.3389/fvets.2021.620347620347Non-antibiotic Approaches for Disease Prevention and Control in Nursery Pigs: A Scoping ReviewLee V. Wisener0Lee V. Wisener1Jan M. Sargeant2Jan M. Sargeant3Terri L. O'Sullivan4Annette M. O'Connor5Scott A. McEwen6Mark Reist7Katheryn J. Churchill8Department of Population Medicine, Ontario Veterinary College, University of Guelph, Guelph, ON, CanadaCentre for Public Health and Zoonoses, University of Guelph, Guelph, ON, CanadaDepartment of Population Medicine, Ontario Veterinary College, University of Guelph, Guelph, ON, CanadaCentre for Public Health and Zoonoses, University of Guelph, Guelph, ON, CanadaDepartment of Population Medicine, Ontario Veterinary College, University of Guelph, Guelph, ON, CanadaDepartment of Large Animal Clinical Sciences, College of Veterinary Medicine, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI, United StatesDepartment of Population Medicine, Ontario Veterinary College, University of Guelph, Guelph, ON, CanadaDepartment of Population Medicine, Ontario Veterinary College, University of Guelph, Guelph, ON, CanadaDepartment of Population Medicine, Ontario Veterinary College, University of Guelph, Guelph, ON, CanadaSwine producers are encouraged to practice antibiotic stewardship by reducing their use of antibiotics belonging to classes of medical importance to humans. We conducted a scoping review of non-antibiotic approaches in the form of products or management practices that might prevent or control disease and thus reduce the need for antibiotics in nursery pigs. Our objectives were to systematically describe the research on this broad topic for the North American context, identify specific topics that could feasibly support systematic reviews, and identify knowledge gaps. A search of multiple databases identified 11,316 articles and proceedings for relevance screening. From these, 441 eligible clinical trials and observational studies were charted. The majority were clinical trials (94%). Study results from EU countries were mostly communicated through journal articles, whereas study results from the USA were mostly communicated through conference proceedings. Interventions and health outcomes were diverse. The two most frequent intervention categories were feed additives and piglet vaccines. The three most frequent outcomes reported were diarrhea, mortality, and indices of vaccine immunity. There were 13 specific topics comprising various feed additives and vaccines that might feasibly support systematic reviews. There were relatively few studies in which interventions were compared with antibiotic comparison groups and relatively few studies evaluating management practices.https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fvets.2021.620347/fullantibiotic stewardshipdisease controldisease preventionnon-antibioic approachesnursery pigsscoping review
spellingShingle Lee V. Wisener
Lee V. Wisener
Jan M. Sargeant
Jan M. Sargeant
Terri L. O'Sullivan
Annette M. O'Connor
Scott A. McEwen
Mark Reist
Katheryn J. Churchill
Non-antibiotic Approaches for Disease Prevention and Control in Nursery Pigs: A Scoping Review
Frontiers in Veterinary Science
antibiotic stewardship
disease control
disease prevention
non-antibioic approaches
nursery pigs
scoping review
title Non-antibiotic Approaches for Disease Prevention and Control in Nursery Pigs: A Scoping Review
title_full Non-antibiotic Approaches for Disease Prevention and Control in Nursery Pigs: A Scoping Review
title_fullStr Non-antibiotic Approaches for Disease Prevention and Control in Nursery Pigs: A Scoping Review
title_full_unstemmed Non-antibiotic Approaches for Disease Prevention and Control in Nursery Pigs: A Scoping Review
title_short Non-antibiotic Approaches for Disease Prevention and Control in Nursery Pigs: A Scoping Review
title_sort non antibiotic approaches for disease prevention and control in nursery pigs a scoping review
topic antibiotic stewardship
disease control
disease prevention
non-antibioic approaches
nursery pigs
scoping review
url https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fvets.2021.620347/full
work_keys_str_mv AT leevwisener nonantibioticapproachesfordiseasepreventionandcontrolinnurserypigsascopingreview
AT leevwisener nonantibioticapproachesfordiseasepreventionandcontrolinnurserypigsascopingreview
AT janmsargeant nonantibioticapproachesfordiseasepreventionandcontrolinnurserypigsascopingreview
AT janmsargeant nonantibioticapproachesfordiseasepreventionandcontrolinnurserypigsascopingreview
AT terrilosullivan nonantibioticapproachesfordiseasepreventionandcontrolinnurserypigsascopingreview
AT annettemoconnor nonantibioticapproachesfordiseasepreventionandcontrolinnurserypigsascopingreview
AT scottamcewen nonantibioticapproachesfordiseasepreventionandcontrolinnurserypigsascopingreview
AT markreist nonantibioticapproachesfordiseasepreventionandcontrolinnurserypigsascopingreview
AT katherynjchurchill nonantibioticapproachesfordiseasepreventionandcontrolinnurserypigsascopingreview