Are peanut oral food challenges still useful? An evaluation of children with suspected peanut allergy, sensitization to Ara h 2 and controlled asthma

Abstract Background Sensitization to Ara h 2 has been proposed as a promising biological marker for the severity of peanut allergy and may reduce the need for oral food challenges. This study aimed to evaluate whether peanut oral food challenge is still a useful diagnostic tool for children with sus...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Iida Ojaniemi, Susanna Salmivesi, Antti Tikkakoski, Jussi Karjalainen, Lauri Lehtimäki, Rüdiger Schultz
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2022-11-01
Series:Allergy, Asthma & Clinical Immunology
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1186/s13223-022-00743-6
_version_ 1811190450003902464
author Iida Ojaniemi
Susanna Salmivesi
Antti Tikkakoski
Jussi Karjalainen
Lauri Lehtimäki
Rüdiger Schultz
author_facet Iida Ojaniemi
Susanna Salmivesi
Antti Tikkakoski
Jussi Karjalainen
Lauri Lehtimäki
Rüdiger Schultz
author_sort Iida Ojaniemi
collection DOAJ
description Abstract Background Sensitization to Ara h 2 has been proposed as a promising biological marker for the severity of peanut allergy and may reduce the need for oral food challenges. This study aimed to evaluate whether peanut oral food challenge is still a useful diagnostic tool for children with suspected peanut allergy and an elevated level of Ara h 2-specific IgE. Additionally, we assessed whether well-controlled asthma is an additional risk for severe reactions. Methods A retrospective analysis of 107 children with sensitization to Ara h 2-specific IgE (> 0.35 kU/l) undergoing open peanut challenges during 2012–2018 in the Tampere University Hospital Allergy Centre, Finland. Results Of the 107 challenges, 82 (77%) were positive. Serum levels of Ara h 2 -sIgE were higher in subjects with a positive challenge than in those who remained negative (median 32.9 (IQR 6.7–99.8) vs. 2.1 (IQR 1.0–4.9) kU/l), p < 0.001) but were not significantly different between subjects with and without anaphylaxis. No correlation was observed between the serum level of Ara h 2-sIgE and reaction severity grading. Well-controlled asthma did not affect the challenge outcome. Conclusions Elevated levels of Ara h 2-specific IgE are associated with a positive outcome in peanut challenges but not a reliable predictor of reaction severity. Additionally, well-controlled asthma is not a risk factor for severe reactions in peanut challenges in children with sensitization to Ara h 2.
first_indexed 2024-04-11T14:50:18Z
format Article
id doaj.art-16ee32e32e0a4c0e8f647834a327df7d
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1710-1492
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-11T14:50:18Z
publishDate 2022-11-01
publisher BMC
record_format Article
series Allergy, Asthma & Clinical Immunology
spelling doaj.art-16ee32e32e0a4c0e8f647834a327df7d2022-12-22T04:17:28ZengBMCAllergy, Asthma & Clinical Immunology1710-14922022-11-011811810.1186/s13223-022-00743-6Are peanut oral food challenges still useful? An evaluation of children with suspected peanut allergy, sensitization to Ara h 2 and controlled asthmaIida Ojaniemi0Susanna Salmivesi1Antti Tikkakoski2Jussi Karjalainen3Lauri Lehtimäki4Rüdiger Schultz5Allergy Centre, Tampere University HospitalAllergy Centre, Tampere University HospitalDepartment of Clinical Physiology and Nuclear Medicine, Tampere University HospitalAllergy Centre, Tampere University HospitalAllergy Centre, Tampere University HospitalAllergy Centre, Tampere University HospitalAbstract Background Sensitization to Ara h 2 has been proposed as a promising biological marker for the severity of peanut allergy and may reduce the need for oral food challenges. This study aimed to evaluate whether peanut oral food challenge is still a useful diagnostic tool for children with suspected peanut allergy and an elevated level of Ara h 2-specific IgE. Additionally, we assessed whether well-controlled asthma is an additional risk for severe reactions. Methods A retrospective analysis of 107 children with sensitization to Ara h 2-specific IgE (> 0.35 kU/l) undergoing open peanut challenges during 2012–2018 in the Tampere University Hospital Allergy Centre, Finland. Results Of the 107 challenges, 82 (77%) were positive. Serum levels of Ara h 2 -sIgE were higher in subjects with a positive challenge than in those who remained negative (median 32.9 (IQR 6.7–99.8) vs. 2.1 (IQR 1.0–4.9) kU/l), p < 0.001) but were not significantly different between subjects with and without anaphylaxis. No correlation was observed between the serum level of Ara h 2-sIgE and reaction severity grading. Well-controlled asthma did not affect the challenge outcome. Conclusions Elevated levels of Ara h 2-specific IgE are associated with a positive outcome in peanut challenges but not a reliable predictor of reaction severity. Additionally, well-controlled asthma is not a risk factor for severe reactions in peanut challenges in children with sensitization to Ara h 2.https://doi.org/10.1186/s13223-022-00743-6Ara h 2Peanut allergyOral food challengeAsthmaAnaphylaxis
spellingShingle Iida Ojaniemi
Susanna Salmivesi
Antti Tikkakoski
Jussi Karjalainen
Lauri Lehtimäki
Rüdiger Schultz
Are peanut oral food challenges still useful? An evaluation of children with suspected peanut allergy, sensitization to Ara h 2 and controlled asthma
Allergy, Asthma & Clinical Immunology
Ara h 2
Peanut allergy
Oral food challenge
Asthma
Anaphylaxis
title Are peanut oral food challenges still useful? An evaluation of children with suspected peanut allergy, sensitization to Ara h 2 and controlled asthma
title_full Are peanut oral food challenges still useful? An evaluation of children with suspected peanut allergy, sensitization to Ara h 2 and controlled asthma
title_fullStr Are peanut oral food challenges still useful? An evaluation of children with suspected peanut allergy, sensitization to Ara h 2 and controlled asthma
title_full_unstemmed Are peanut oral food challenges still useful? An evaluation of children with suspected peanut allergy, sensitization to Ara h 2 and controlled asthma
title_short Are peanut oral food challenges still useful? An evaluation of children with suspected peanut allergy, sensitization to Ara h 2 and controlled asthma
title_sort are peanut oral food challenges still useful an evaluation of children with suspected peanut allergy sensitization to ara h 2 and controlled asthma
topic Ara h 2
Peanut allergy
Oral food challenge
Asthma
Anaphylaxis
url https://doi.org/10.1186/s13223-022-00743-6
work_keys_str_mv AT iidaojaniemi arepeanutoralfoodchallengesstillusefulanevaluationofchildrenwithsuspectedpeanutallergysensitizationtoarah2andcontrolledasthma
AT susannasalmivesi arepeanutoralfoodchallengesstillusefulanevaluationofchildrenwithsuspectedpeanutallergysensitizationtoarah2andcontrolledasthma
AT anttitikkakoski arepeanutoralfoodchallengesstillusefulanevaluationofchildrenwithsuspectedpeanutallergysensitizationtoarah2andcontrolledasthma
AT jussikarjalainen arepeanutoralfoodchallengesstillusefulanevaluationofchildrenwithsuspectedpeanutallergysensitizationtoarah2andcontrolledasthma
AT laurilehtimaki arepeanutoralfoodchallengesstillusefulanevaluationofchildrenwithsuspectedpeanutallergysensitizationtoarah2andcontrolledasthma
AT rudigerschultz arepeanutoralfoodchallengesstillusefulanevaluationofchildrenwithsuspectedpeanutallergysensitizationtoarah2andcontrolledasthma