Multi-method analysis of a historic wooden trough from Kentucky, USA: a case study in corroborating artifact oral histories with heritage science

Abstract Oral history indicates that a large wooden trough held in storage at the University of Kentucky’s William S. Webb Museum of Anthropology was a component of the saltpeter mining operation in Mammoth Cave in the late 18th and early 19th centuries, worked largely by enslaved persons. We used m...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Katharine G. Napora, George M. Crothers, Carla S. Hadden, Lisa Guerre, Laura J. Waldman, Hugo Reyes-Centeno, James Keppeler, Madeline Imler, Edward Jakaitis, Alexander Metz, Philip B. Mink
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: SpringerOpen 2023-11-01
Series:Heritage Science
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1186/s40494-023-01075-3
_version_ 1797630003038388224
author Katharine G. Napora
George M. Crothers
Carla S. Hadden
Lisa Guerre
Laura J. Waldman
Hugo Reyes-Centeno
James Keppeler
Madeline Imler
Edward Jakaitis
Alexander Metz
Philip B. Mink
author_facet Katharine G. Napora
George M. Crothers
Carla S. Hadden
Lisa Guerre
Laura J. Waldman
Hugo Reyes-Centeno
James Keppeler
Madeline Imler
Edward Jakaitis
Alexander Metz
Philip B. Mink
author_sort Katharine G. Napora
collection DOAJ
description Abstract Oral history indicates that a large wooden trough held in storage at the University of Kentucky’s William S. Webb Museum of Anthropology was a component of the saltpeter mining operation in Mammoth Cave in the late 18th and early 19th centuries, worked largely by enslaved persons. We used multiple heritage science methods, including radiocarbon wiggle-match dating, tree-ring dating, scanning electron microscopy-energy dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (SEM–EDS), and optical scanning, combined with historical research, to examine the trough. Our analysis supports the oral history of the trough as an artifact of the mining system in Mammoth Cave. This case study illustrates how heritage science methods can provide corroboration for the origins and biographies of poorly documented historical artifacts.
first_indexed 2024-03-11T11:01:53Z
format Article
id doaj.art-16facc76c36d495d87d61ab2f77c200c
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2050-7445
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-11T11:01:53Z
publishDate 2023-11-01
publisher SpringerOpen
record_format Article
series Heritage Science
spelling doaj.art-16facc76c36d495d87d61ab2f77c200c2023-11-12T12:26:28ZengSpringerOpenHeritage Science2050-74452023-11-0111111310.1186/s40494-023-01075-3Multi-method analysis of a historic wooden trough from Kentucky, USA: a case study in corroborating artifact oral histories with heritage scienceKatharine G. Napora0George M. Crothers1Carla S. Hadden2Lisa Guerre3Laura J. Waldman4Hugo Reyes-Centeno5James Keppeler6Madeline Imler7Edward Jakaitis8Alexander Metz9Philip B. Mink10Department of Anthropology, Florida Atlantic UniversityDepartment of Anthropology, University of KentuckyCenter for Applied Isotope Studies at the University of GeorgiaUniversity of Kentucky William S. Webb Museum of AnthropologyDepartment of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering, University of KentuckyDepartment of Anthropology, University of KentuckyDepartment of Anthropology, University of KentuckyDepartment of Anthropology, University of KentuckyMammoth Cave National ParkDepartment of Anthropology, University of KentuckyKentucky Office of State ArchaeologyAbstract Oral history indicates that a large wooden trough held in storage at the University of Kentucky’s William S. Webb Museum of Anthropology was a component of the saltpeter mining operation in Mammoth Cave in the late 18th and early 19th centuries, worked largely by enslaved persons. We used multiple heritage science methods, including radiocarbon wiggle-match dating, tree-ring dating, scanning electron microscopy-energy dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (SEM–EDS), and optical scanning, combined with historical research, to examine the trough. Our analysis supports the oral history of the trough as an artifact of the mining system in Mammoth Cave. This case study illustrates how heritage science methods can provide corroboration for the origins and biographies of poorly documented historical artifacts.https://doi.org/10.1186/s40494-023-01075-3Mammoth CaveSaltpeter miningHistoric artifactsOral histories3D scanningRadiocarbon wiggle-match dating
spellingShingle Katharine G. Napora
George M. Crothers
Carla S. Hadden
Lisa Guerre
Laura J. Waldman
Hugo Reyes-Centeno
James Keppeler
Madeline Imler
Edward Jakaitis
Alexander Metz
Philip B. Mink
Multi-method analysis of a historic wooden trough from Kentucky, USA: a case study in corroborating artifact oral histories with heritage science
Heritage Science
Mammoth Cave
Saltpeter mining
Historic artifacts
Oral histories
3D scanning
Radiocarbon wiggle-match dating
title Multi-method analysis of a historic wooden trough from Kentucky, USA: a case study in corroborating artifact oral histories with heritage science
title_full Multi-method analysis of a historic wooden trough from Kentucky, USA: a case study in corroborating artifact oral histories with heritage science
title_fullStr Multi-method analysis of a historic wooden trough from Kentucky, USA: a case study in corroborating artifact oral histories with heritage science
title_full_unstemmed Multi-method analysis of a historic wooden trough from Kentucky, USA: a case study in corroborating artifact oral histories with heritage science
title_short Multi-method analysis of a historic wooden trough from Kentucky, USA: a case study in corroborating artifact oral histories with heritage science
title_sort multi method analysis of a historic wooden trough from kentucky usa a case study in corroborating artifact oral histories with heritage science
topic Mammoth Cave
Saltpeter mining
Historic artifacts
Oral histories
3D scanning
Radiocarbon wiggle-match dating
url https://doi.org/10.1186/s40494-023-01075-3
work_keys_str_mv AT katharinegnapora multimethodanalysisofahistoricwoodentroughfromkentuckyusaacasestudyincorroboratingartifactoralhistorieswithheritagescience
AT georgemcrothers multimethodanalysisofahistoricwoodentroughfromkentuckyusaacasestudyincorroboratingartifactoralhistorieswithheritagescience
AT carlashadden multimethodanalysisofahistoricwoodentroughfromkentuckyusaacasestudyincorroboratingartifactoralhistorieswithheritagescience
AT lisaguerre multimethodanalysisofahistoricwoodentroughfromkentuckyusaacasestudyincorroboratingartifactoralhistorieswithheritagescience
AT laurajwaldman multimethodanalysisofahistoricwoodentroughfromkentuckyusaacasestudyincorroboratingartifactoralhistorieswithheritagescience
AT hugoreyescenteno multimethodanalysisofahistoricwoodentroughfromkentuckyusaacasestudyincorroboratingartifactoralhistorieswithheritagescience
AT jameskeppeler multimethodanalysisofahistoricwoodentroughfromkentuckyusaacasestudyincorroboratingartifactoralhistorieswithheritagescience
AT madelineimler multimethodanalysisofahistoricwoodentroughfromkentuckyusaacasestudyincorroboratingartifactoralhistorieswithheritagescience
AT edwardjakaitis multimethodanalysisofahistoricwoodentroughfromkentuckyusaacasestudyincorroboratingartifactoralhistorieswithheritagescience
AT alexandermetz multimethodanalysisofahistoricwoodentroughfromkentuckyusaacasestudyincorroboratingartifactoralhistorieswithheritagescience
AT philipbmink multimethodanalysisofahistoricwoodentroughfromkentuckyusaacasestudyincorroboratingartifactoralhistorieswithheritagescience