Accuracy of measuring scapular position and motion with a novel motion capture system

Background: Scapula kinematics is recognized to be a crucial variable in shoulder dysfunction. Nevertheless, quantitative scapula tracking and measurement are not part of the current clinical evaluation. The main concern is measurement accuracy. Methods: To assess the accuracy of the wearable sensor...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Matteo Mantovani, MSc, MBA, Aaron Sciascia, PhD, ATC, PES, SMTC, FNAP, Alessandro Varini, MSc, Marco Muraccini, PhD, Fabrizio Nardini, PhD, Pietro Tonino, MD, Benjamin W. Kibler, MD
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Elsevier 2023-08-01
Series:JSES Reviews, Reports, and Techniques
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S266663912300041X
_version_ 1797770025560440832
author Matteo Mantovani, MSc, MBA
Aaron Sciascia, PhD, ATC, PES, SMTC, FNAP
Alessandro Varini, MSc
Marco Muraccini, PhD
Fabrizio Nardini, PhD
Pietro Tonino, MD
Benjamin W. Kibler, MD
author_facet Matteo Mantovani, MSc, MBA
Aaron Sciascia, PhD, ATC, PES, SMTC, FNAP
Alessandro Varini, MSc
Marco Muraccini, PhD
Fabrizio Nardini, PhD
Pietro Tonino, MD
Benjamin W. Kibler, MD
author_sort Matteo Mantovani, MSc, MBA
collection DOAJ
description Background: Scapula kinematics is recognized to be a crucial variable in shoulder dysfunction. Nevertheless, quantitative scapula tracking and measurement are not part of the current clinical evaluation. The main concern is measurement accuracy. Methods: To assess the accuracy of the wearable sensor technology Showmotion a cadaver experiment was designed, allowing a direct comparison between sensors directly pinned to the scapula and superficial sensors. A measurement protocol was adopted to evaluate errors in measurement, mimicking the suggested in vivo evaluation. Sensors were simultaneously placed above (supraspinal) and below (infraspinal) the scapular spine to determine if one placement resulted in fewer errors compared to the other. Results: Mean and standard deviations of the supraspinal sensor root mean square error (RMSE) in flexion-extension movements resulted in 3.59° ± 2.36°, 4.73° ± 2.98°, and 6.26° ± 3.62° for upward-downward rotation (up-down), anterior-posterior tilt and internal-external (intra-extra) rotation, respectively, while 2.16° ± 1.21°, 2.20° ± 1.02°, and 4.46° ± 2.16° for the infraspinal sensor. In abduction-adduction movements, mean and standard deviations of the supraspinal sensor RMSE resulted in 4.26° ± 2.98°, 5.68° ± 4.22°, and 7.04° ± 4.36° for up-down rotation, anterior-posterior tilt, and intra-extra rotation, respectively, while 2.38° ± 1.63°, 2.47° ± 1.77°, and 4.92° ± 3.14° for the infraspinal sensor. The same behavior was confirmed in shrug movements, where 4.35° ± 3.24°, 4.63° ± 3.09°, and 5.34° ± 6.67° are mean and standard deviations of the supraspinal sensor RMSE for up-down rotation, anterior-posterior tilt, and intra-extra rotation, respectively, while 2.76° ± 1.87°, 2.83° ± 2.53°, and 4.68° ± 5.22° for the infraspinal sensor. Conclusion: This method of quantitative assessment of scapular motion is shown to have good accuracy and low error between the sensor measurements and actual bone movement in multiple planes of scapular motion, both over the entire range of motion and in its individual segment intervals. The decreased amount of error with the infraspinal sensor placement suggests that placement is ideal for clinical quantitative assessment of scapular motion.
first_indexed 2024-03-12T21:16:33Z
format Article
id doaj.art-1701cda6f98f465f91ffb6b5fe5326df
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2666-6391
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-12T21:16:33Z
publishDate 2023-08-01
publisher Elsevier
record_format Article
series JSES Reviews, Reports, and Techniques
spelling doaj.art-1701cda6f98f465f91ffb6b5fe5326df2023-07-29T04:35:59ZengElsevierJSES Reviews, Reports, and Techniques2666-63912023-08-0133303311Accuracy of measuring scapular position and motion with a novel motion capture systemMatteo Mantovani, MSc, MBA0Aaron Sciascia, PhD, ATC, PES, SMTC, FNAP1Alessandro Varini, MSc2Marco Muraccini, PhD3Fabrizio Nardini, PhD4Pietro Tonino, MD5Benjamin W. Kibler, MD6NCS Lab Srl, Medical Device Research Lab, Carpi (Modena), Italy; Corresponding author: Matteo Mantovani, MSc, MBA, NCS Lab Srl, Medical Device Research Lab, Via Pola Esterna, 4/12, Carpi, 41012 MO, Italy.Institute of Clinical Outcomes and Research, Lexington Clinic, Lexington, KY, USANCS Lab Srl, Medical Device Research Lab, Carpi (Modena), ItalyNCS Lab Srl, Medical Device Research Lab, Carpi (Modena), ItalyNCS Lab Srl, Medical Device Research Lab, Carpi (Modena), ItalyDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery and Rehabilitation, Stritch School of Medicine, Loyola University Chicago, Maywood, IL, USAShoulder Center of Kentucky, Lexington Clinic, Lexington, KY, USABackground: Scapula kinematics is recognized to be a crucial variable in shoulder dysfunction. Nevertheless, quantitative scapula tracking and measurement are not part of the current clinical evaluation. The main concern is measurement accuracy. Methods: To assess the accuracy of the wearable sensor technology Showmotion a cadaver experiment was designed, allowing a direct comparison between sensors directly pinned to the scapula and superficial sensors. A measurement protocol was adopted to evaluate errors in measurement, mimicking the suggested in vivo evaluation. Sensors were simultaneously placed above (supraspinal) and below (infraspinal) the scapular spine to determine if one placement resulted in fewer errors compared to the other. Results: Mean and standard deviations of the supraspinal sensor root mean square error (RMSE) in flexion-extension movements resulted in 3.59° ± 2.36°, 4.73° ± 2.98°, and 6.26° ± 3.62° for upward-downward rotation (up-down), anterior-posterior tilt and internal-external (intra-extra) rotation, respectively, while 2.16° ± 1.21°, 2.20° ± 1.02°, and 4.46° ± 2.16° for the infraspinal sensor. In abduction-adduction movements, mean and standard deviations of the supraspinal sensor RMSE resulted in 4.26° ± 2.98°, 5.68° ± 4.22°, and 7.04° ± 4.36° for up-down rotation, anterior-posterior tilt, and intra-extra rotation, respectively, while 2.38° ± 1.63°, 2.47° ± 1.77°, and 4.92° ± 3.14° for the infraspinal sensor. The same behavior was confirmed in shrug movements, where 4.35° ± 3.24°, 4.63° ± 3.09°, and 5.34° ± 6.67° are mean and standard deviations of the supraspinal sensor RMSE for up-down rotation, anterior-posterior tilt, and intra-extra rotation, respectively, while 2.76° ± 1.87°, 2.83° ± 2.53°, and 4.68° ± 5.22° for the infraspinal sensor. Conclusion: This method of quantitative assessment of scapular motion is shown to have good accuracy and low error between the sensor measurements and actual bone movement in multiple planes of scapular motion, both over the entire range of motion and in its individual segment intervals. The decreased amount of error with the infraspinal sensor placement suggests that placement is ideal for clinical quantitative assessment of scapular motion.http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S266663912300041XScapulaKinematicsScapular dyskinesisAccuracyEvaluationMotion analysis
spellingShingle Matteo Mantovani, MSc, MBA
Aaron Sciascia, PhD, ATC, PES, SMTC, FNAP
Alessandro Varini, MSc
Marco Muraccini, PhD
Fabrizio Nardini, PhD
Pietro Tonino, MD
Benjamin W. Kibler, MD
Accuracy of measuring scapular position and motion with a novel motion capture system
JSES Reviews, Reports, and Techniques
Scapula
Kinematics
Scapular dyskinesis
Accuracy
Evaluation
Motion analysis
title Accuracy of measuring scapular position and motion with a novel motion capture system
title_full Accuracy of measuring scapular position and motion with a novel motion capture system
title_fullStr Accuracy of measuring scapular position and motion with a novel motion capture system
title_full_unstemmed Accuracy of measuring scapular position and motion with a novel motion capture system
title_short Accuracy of measuring scapular position and motion with a novel motion capture system
title_sort accuracy of measuring scapular position and motion with a novel motion capture system
topic Scapula
Kinematics
Scapular dyskinesis
Accuracy
Evaluation
Motion analysis
url http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S266663912300041X
work_keys_str_mv AT matteomantovanimscmba accuracyofmeasuringscapularpositionandmotionwithanovelmotioncapturesystem
AT aaronsciasciaphdatcpessmtcfnap accuracyofmeasuringscapularpositionandmotionwithanovelmotioncapturesystem
AT alessandrovarinimsc accuracyofmeasuringscapularpositionandmotionwithanovelmotioncapturesystem
AT marcomuracciniphd accuracyofmeasuringscapularpositionandmotionwithanovelmotioncapturesystem
AT fabrizionardiniphd accuracyofmeasuringscapularpositionandmotionwithanovelmotioncapturesystem
AT pietrotoninomd accuracyofmeasuringscapularpositionandmotionwithanovelmotioncapturesystem
AT benjaminwkiblermd accuracyofmeasuringscapularpositionandmotionwithanovelmotioncapturesystem