Examining the differential effects of information about the death penalty on retributivists and non-retributivists in Japan: a refutation of Marshall's third hypothesis

This study aimed to test Marshall's third hypothesis—that information about the death penalty hardly affects the attitude of death penalty supporters on retribution grounds—utilizing a non-American sample. Four pre-registered experiments were conducted, involving Japanese participants randomly...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Eiichiro Watamura, Tomohiro Ioku, Tomoya Mukai
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Frontiers Media S.A. 2023-09-01
Series:Frontiers in Psychology
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1236587/full
_version_ 1797685480020508672
author Eiichiro Watamura
Tomohiro Ioku
Tomoya Mukai
author_facet Eiichiro Watamura
Tomohiro Ioku
Tomoya Mukai
author_sort Eiichiro Watamura
collection DOAJ
description This study aimed to test Marshall's third hypothesis—that information about the death penalty hardly affects the attitude of death penalty supporters on retribution grounds—utilizing a non-American sample. Four pre-registered experiments were conducted, involving Japanese participants randomly selected from sample pools of retributivists and non-retributivists, based on their reasons for supporting the death penalty. One group received information exposure, while the other was under control conditions. Participants read about deterrence (Study 1) or false convictions (Study 2–4). Except for the results of Study 4, retributivists and non-retributivists were equally affected or unaffected by information. Marshall's third hypothesis is therefore not supported. Retributivists strongly favored the death penalty; higher empathy toward criminals was associated with less pro-death penalty attitudes. Additionally, there were differences in the influence of information. These results suggest the need for a new approach to researching the relationship between public attitudes and information on the death penalty.
first_indexed 2024-03-12T00:44:47Z
format Article
id doaj.art-17060ffb031d4c36a94a55996275320a
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1664-1078
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-12T00:44:47Z
publishDate 2023-09-01
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format Article
series Frontiers in Psychology
spelling doaj.art-17060ffb031d4c36a94a55996275320a2023-09-14T18:13:17ZengFrontiers Media S.A.Frontiers in Psychology1664-10782023-09-011410.3389/fpsyg.2023.12365871236587Examining the differential effects of information about the death penalty on retributivists and non-retributivists in Japan: a refutation of Marshall's third hypothesisEiichiro Watamura0Tomohiro Ioku1Tomoya Mukai2Graduate School of Human Sciences, Osaka University, Osaka, JapanGraduate School of Human Sciences, Osaka University, Osaka, JapanGraduate Schools for Law and Politics, University of Tokyo, Tokyo, JapanThis study aimed to test Marshall's third hypothesis—that information about the death penalty hardly affects the attitude of death penalty supporters on retribution grounds—utilizing a non-American sample. Four pre-registered experiments were conducted, involving Japanese participants randomly selected from sample pools of retributivists and non-retributivists, based on their reasons for supporting the death penalty. One group received information exposure, while the other was under control conditions. Participants read about deterrence (Study 1) or false convictions (Study 2–4). Except for the results of Study 4, retributivists and non-retributivists were equally affected or unaffected by information. Marshall's third hypothesis is therefore not supported. Retributivists strongly favored the death penalty; higher empathy toward criminals was associated with less pro-death penalty attitudes. Additionally, there were differences in the influence of information. These results suggest the need for a new approach to researching the relationship between public attitudes and information on the death penalty.https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1236587/fullcapital punishmentdeath penaltydeterrencefalse convictionsJapanese public opinionMarshall hypothesis
spellingShingle Eiichiro Watamura
Tomohiro Ioku
Tomoya Mukai
Examining the differential effects of information about the death penalty on retributivists and non-retributivists in Japan: a refutation of Marshall's third hypothesis
Frontiers in Psychology
capital punishment
death penalty
deterrence
false convictions
Japanese public opinion
Marshall hypothesis
title Examining the differential effects of information about the death penalty on retributivists and non-retributivists in Japan: a refutation of Marshall's third hypothesis
title_full Examining the differential effects of information about the death penalty on retributivists and non-retributivists in Japan: a refutation of Marshall's third hypothesis
title_fullStr Examining the differential effects of information about the death penalty on retributivists and non-retributivists in Japan: a refutation of Marshall's third hypothesis
title_full_unstemmed Examining the differential effects of information about the death penalty on retributivists and non-retributivists in Japan: a refutation of Marshall's third hypothesis
title_short Examining the differential effects of information about the death penalty on retributivists and non-retributivists in Japan: a refutation of Marshall's third hypothesis
title_sort examining the differential effects of information about the death penalty on retributivists and non retributivists in japan a refutation of marshall s third hypothesis
topic capital punishment
death penalty
deterrence
false convictions
Japanese public opinion
Marshall hypothesis
url https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1236587/full
work_keys_str_mv AT eiichirowatamura examiningthedifferentialeffectsofinformationaboutthedeathpenaltyonretributivistsandnonretributivistsinjapanarefutationofmarshallsthirdhypothesis
AT tomohiroioku examiningthedifferentialeffectsofinformationaboutthedeathpenaltyonretributivistsandnonretributivistsinjapanarefutationofmarshallsthirdhypothesis
AT tomoyamukai examiningthedifferentialeffectsofinformationaboutthedeathpenaltyonretributivistsandnonretributivistsinjapanarefutationofmarshallsthirdhypothesis