Satisfaction of patients hospitalised in psychiatric hospitals: a randomised comparison of two psychiatric-specific and one generic satisfaction questionnaires

<p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>While there is interest in measuring the satisfaction of patients discharged from psychiatric hospitals, it might be important to determine whether surveys of psychiatric patients should employ generic or psychiatry-specific instrume...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Cléopas Agatta, Bonsack Charles, Cathieni Federico, Peer Laurence, Scherer Frédy, Peytremann-Bridevaux Isabelle, Kolly Véronique, Perneger Thomas V, Burnand Bernard
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2006-08-01
Series:BMC Health Services Research
Online Access:http://www.biomedcentral.com/1472-6963/6/108
_version_ 1818392604552724480
author Cléopas Agatta
Bonsack Charles
Cathieni Federico
Peer Laurence
Scherer Frédy
Peytremann-Bridevaux Isabelle
Kolly Véronique
Perneger Thomas V
Burnand Bernard
author_facet Cléopas Agatta
Bonsack Charles
Cathieni Federico
Peer Laurence
Scherer Frédy
Peytremann-Bridevaux Isabelle
Kolly Véronique
Perneger Thomas V
Burnand Bernard
author_sort Cléopas Agatta
collection DOAJ
description <p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>While there is interest in measuring the satisfaction of patients discharged from psychiatric hospitals, it might be important to determine whether surveys of psychiatric patients should employ generic or psychiatry-specific instruments. The aim of this study was to compare two psychiatric-specific and one generic questionnaires assessing patients' satisfaction after a hospitalisation in a psychiatric hospital.</p> <p>Methods</p> <p>We randomised adult patients discharged from two Swiss psychiatric university hospitals between April and September 2004, to receive one of three instruments: the Saphora-Psy questionnaire, the Perceptions of Care survey questionnaire or the Picker Institute questionnaire for acute care hospitals. In addition to the comparison of response rates, completion time, mean number of missing items and mean ceiling effect, we targeted our comparison on patients and asked them to answer ten evaluation questions about the questionnaire they had just completed.</p> <p>Results</p> <p>728 out of 1550 eligible patients (47%) participated in the study. Across questionnaires, response rates were similar (Saphora-Psy: 48.5%, Perceptions of Care: 49.9%, Picker: 43.4%; <it>P </it>= 0.08), average completion time was lowest for the Perceptions of Care questionnaire (minutes: Saphora-Psy: 17.7, Perceptions of Care: 13.7, Picker: 17.5; <it>P </it>= 0.005), the Saphora-Psy questionnaire had the largest mean proportion of missing responses (Saphora-Psy: 7.1%, Perceptions of Care: 2.8%, Picker: 4.0%; <it>P </it>< 0.001) and the Perceptions of Care questionnaire showed the highest ceiling effect (Saphora-Psy: 17.1%, Perceptions of Care: 41.9%, Picker: 36.3%; <it>P </it>< 0.001). There were no differences in the patients' evaluation of the questionnaires.</p> <p>Conclusion</p> <p>Despite differences in the intended target population, content, lay-out and length of questionnaires, none appeared to be obviously better based on our comparison. All three presented advantages and drawbacks and could be used for the satisfaction evaluation of psychiatric inpatients. However, if comparison across medical services or hospitals is desired, using a generic questionnaire might be advantageous.</p>
first_indexed 2024-12-14T05:32:04Z
format Article
id doaj.art-1707554a1d1c4eb29cc9b5276fdff5de
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1472-6963
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-14T05:32:04Z
publishDate 2006-08-01
publisher BMC
record_format Article
series BMC Health Services Research
spelling doaj.art-1707554a1d1c4eb29cc9b5276fdff5de2022-12-21T23:15:18ZengBMCBMC Health Services Research1472-69632006-08-016110810.1186/1472-6963-6-108Satisfaction of patients hospitalised in psychiatric hospitals: a randomised comparison of two psychiatric-specific and one generic satisfaction questionnairesCléopas AgattaBonsack CharlesCathieni FedericoPeer LaurenceScherer FrédyPeytremann-Bridevaux IsabelleKolly VéroniquePerneger Thomas VBurnand Bernard<p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>While there is interest in measuring the satisfaction of patients discharged from psychiatric hospitals, it might be important to determine whether surveys of psychiatric patients should employ generic or psychiatry-specific instruments. The aim of this study was to compare two psychiatric-specific and one generic questionnaires assessing patients' satisfaction after a hospitalisation in a psychiatric hospital.</p> <p>Methods</p> <p>We randomised adult patients discharged from two Swiss psychiatric university hospitals between April and September 2004, to receive one of three instruments: the Saphora-Psy questionnaire, the Perceptions of Care survey questionnaire or the Picker Institute questionnaire for acute care hospitals. In addition to the comparison of response rates, completion time, mean number of missing items and mean ceiling effect, we targeted our comparison on patients and asked them to answer ten evaluation questions about the questionnaire they had just completed.</p> <p>Results</p> <p>728 out of 1550 eligible patients (47%) participated in the study. Across questionnaires, response rates were similar (Saphora-Psy: 48.5%, Perceptions of Care: 49.9%, Picker: 43.4%; <it>P </it>= 0.08), average completion time was lowest for the Perceptions of Care questionnaire (minutes: Saphora-Psy: 17.7, Perceptions of Care: 13.7, Picker: 17.5; <it>P </it>= 0.005), the Saphora-Psy questionnaire had the largest mean proportion of missing responses (Saphora-Psy: 7.1%, Perceptions of Care: 2.8%, Picker: 4.0%; <it>P </it>< 0.001) and the Perceptions of Care questionnaire showed the highest ceiling effect (Saphora-Psy: 17.1%, Perceptions of Care: 41.9%, Picker: 36.3%; <it>P </it>< 0.001). There were no differences in the patients' evaluation of the questionnaires.</p> <p>Conclusion</p> <p>Despite differences in the intended target population, content, lay-out and length of questionnaires, none appeared to be obviously better based on our comparison. All three presented advantages and drawbacks and could be used for the satisfaction evaluation of psychiatric inpatients. However, if comparison across medical services or hospitals is desired, using a generic questionnaire might be advantageous.</p>http://www.biomedcentral.com/1472-6963/6/108
spellingShingle Cléopas Agatta
Bonsack Charles
Cathieni Federico
Peer Laurence
Scherer Frédy
Peytremann-Bridevaux Isabelle
Kolly Véronique
Perneger Thomas V
Burnand Bernard
Satisfaction of patients hospitalised in psychiatric hospitals: a randomised comparison of two psychiatric-specific and one generic satisfaction questionnaires
BMC Health Services Research
title Satisfaction of patients hospitalised in psychiatric hospitals: a randomised comparison of two psychiatric-specific and one generic satisfaction questionnaires
title_full Satisfaction of patients hospitalised in psychiatric hospitals: a randomised comparison of two psychiatric-specific and one generic satisfaction questionnaires
title_fullStr Satisfaction of patients hospitalised in psychiatric hospitals: a randomised comparison of two psychiatric-specific and one generic satisfaction questionnaires
title_full_unstemmed Satisfaction of patients hospitalised in psychiatric hospitals: a randomised comparison of two psychiatric-specific and one generic satisfaction questionnaires
title_short Satisfaction of patients hospitalised in psychiatric hospitals: a randomised comparison of two psychiatric-specific and one generic satisfaction questionnaires
title_sort satisfaction of patients hospitalised in psychiatric hospitals a randomised comparison of two psychiatric specific and one generic satisfaction questionnaires
url http://www.biomedcentral.com/1472-6963/6/108
work_keys_str_mv AT cleopasagatta satisfactionofpatientshospitalisedinpsychiatrichospitalsarandomisedcomparisonoftwopsychiatricspecificandonegenericsatisfactionquestionnaires
AT bonsackcharles satisfactionofpatientshospitalisedinpsychiatrichospitalsarandomisedcomparisonoftwopsychiatricspecificandonegenericsatisfactionquestionnaires
AT cathienifederico satisfactionofpatientshospitalisedinpsychiatrichospitalsarandomisedcomparisonoftwopsychiatricspecificandonegenericsatisfactionquestionnaires
AT peerlaurence satisfactionofpatientshospitalisedinpsychiatrichospitalsarandomisedcomparisonoftwopsychiatricspecificandonegenericsatisfactionquestionnaires
AT schererfredy satisfactionofpatientshospitalisedinpsychiatrichospitalsarandomisedcomparisonoftwopsychiatricspecificandonegenericsatisfactionquestionnaires
AT peytremannbridevauxisabelle satisfactionofpatientshospitalisedinpsychiatrichospitalsarandomisedcomparisonoftwopsychiatricspecificandonegenericsatisfactionquestionnaires
AT kollyveronique satisfactionofpatientshospitalisedinpsychiatrichospitalsarandomisedcomparisonoftwopsychiatricspecificandonegenericsatisfactionquestionnaires
AT pernegerthomasv satisfactionofpatientshospitalisedinpsychiatrichospitalsarandomisedcomparisonoftwopsychiatricspecificandonegenericsatisfactionquestionnaires
AT burnandbernard satisfactionofpatientshospitalisedinpsychiatrichospitalsarandomisedcomparisonoftwopsychiatricspecificandonegenericsatisfactionquestionnaires