3D mapping of soil organic carbon content and soil moisture with multiple geophysical sensors and machine learning

Abstract Soil organic C (SOC) and soil moisture (SM) affect the agricultural productivity of soils. For sustainable food production, knowledge of the horizontal as well as vertical variability of SOC and SM at field scale is crucial. Machine learning models using depth‐related data from multiple ele...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Tobias Rentschler, Ulrike Werban, Mario Ahner, Thorsten Behrens, Philipp Gries, Thomas Scholten, Sandra Teuber, Karsten Schmidt
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wiley 2020-01-01
Series:Vadose Zone Journal
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1002/vzj2.20062
_version_ 1831678387701153792
author Tobias Rentschler
Ulrike Werban
Mario Ahner
Thorsten Behrens
Philipp Gries
Thomas Scholten
Sandra Teuber
Karsten Schmidt
author_facet Tobias Rentschler
Ulrike Werban
Mario Ahner
Thorsten Behrens
Philipp Gries
Thomas Scholten
Sandra Teuber
Karsten Schmidt
author_sort Tobias Rentschler
collection DOAJ
description Abstract Soil organic C (SOC) and soil moisture (SM) affect the agricultural productivity of soils. For sustainable food production, knowledge of the horizontal as well as vertical variability of SOC and SM at field scale is crucial. Machine learning models using depth‐related data from multiple electromagnetic induction (EMI) sensors and a gamma‐ray spectrometer can provide insights into this variability of SOC and SM. In this work, we applied weighted conditioned Latin hypercube sampling to calculate 25 representative soil profile locations based on geophysical measurements on the surveyed agricultural field, for sampling and modeling. Ten additional random profiles were used for independent model validation. Soil samples were taken from four equal depth increments of 15 cm each. These were used to approximate polynomial and exponential functions to reproduce the vertical trends of SOC and SM as soil depth functions. We modeled the function coefficients of the soil depth functions spatially with Cubist and random forests with the geophysical measurements as environmental covariates. The spatial prediction of the depth functions provides three‐dimensional (3D) maps of the field scale. The main findings are (a) the 3D models of SOC and SM had low errors; (b) the polynomial function provided better results than the exponential function, as the vertical trends of SOC and SM did not decrease uniformly; and (c) the spatial prediction of SOC and SM with Cubist provided slightly lower error than with random forests. Hence, we recommend modeling the second‐degree polynomial with Cubist for 3D prediction of SOC and SM at field scale.
first_indexed 2024-12-20T04:58:49Z
format Article
id doaj.art-1710d72746c6419f89d9a855386e3545
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1539-1663
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-20T04:58:49Z
publishDate 2020-01-01
publisher Wiley
record_format Article
series Vadose Zone Journal
spelling doaj.art-1710d72746c6419f89d9a855386e35452022-12-21T19:52:37ZengWileyVadose Zone Journal1539-16632020-01-01191n/an/a10.1002/vzj2.200623D mapping of soil organic carbon content and soil moisture with multiple geophysical sensors and machine learningTobias Rentschler0Ulrike Werban1Mario Ahner2Thorsten Behrens3Philipp Gries4Thomas Scholten5Sandra Teuber6Karsten Schmidt7Dep. of Geosciences Chair of Soil Science and Geomorphology Univ. of Tübingen Rümelinstr. 19‐23 Tübingen 72070 GermanyDep. of Monitoring and Exploration Technologies Helmholtz Centre for Environmental Research–UFZ Permoserstr. 15 Leipzig 04318 GermanyDep. of Geosciences Chair of Soil Science and Geomorphology Univ. of Tübingen Rümelinstr. 19‐23 Tübingen 72070 GermanyDep. of Geosciences Chair of Soil Science and Geomorphology Univ. of Tübingen Rümelinstr. 19‐23 Tübingen 72070 GermanyDep. of Geosciences Chair of Soil Science and Geomorphology Univ. of Tübingen Rümelinstr. 19‐23 Tübingen 72070 GermanyDep. of Geosciences Chair of Soil Science and Geomorphology Univ. of Tübingen Rümelinstr. 19‐23 Tübingen 72070 GermanyDep. of Geosciences Chair of Soil Science and Geomorphology Univ. of Tübingen Rümelinstr. 19‐23 Tübingen 72070 GermanyDep. of Geosciences Chair of Soil Science and Geomorphology Univ. of Tübingen Rümelinstr. 19‐23 Tübingen 72070 GermanyAbstract Soil organic C (SOC) and soil moisture (SM) affect the agricultural productivity of soils. For sustainable food production, knowledge of the horizontal as well as vertical variability of SOC and SM at field scale is crucial. Machine learning models using depth‐related data from multiple electromagnetic induction (EMI) sensors and a gamma‐ray spectrometer can provide insights into this variability of SOC and SM. In this work, we applied weighted conditioned Latin hypercube sampling to calculate 25 representative soil profile locations based on geophysical measurements on the surveyed agricultural field, for sampling and modeling. Ten additional random profiles were used for independent model validation. Soil samples were taken from four equal depth increments of 15 cm each. These were used to approximate polynomial and exponential functions to reproduce the vertical trends of SOC and SM as soil depth functions. We modeled the function coefficients of the soil depth functions spatially with Cubist and random forests with the geophysical measurements as environmental covariates. The spatial prediction of the depth functions provides three‐dimensional (3D) maps of the field scale. The main findings are (a) the 3D models of SOC and SM had low errors; (b) the polynomial function provided better results than the exponential function, as the vertical trends of SOC and SM did not decrease uniformly; and (c) the spatial prediction of SOC and SM with Cubist provided slightly lower error than with random forests. Hence, we recommend modeling the second‐degree polynomial with Cubist for 3D prediction of SOC and SM at field scale.https://doi.org/10.1002/vzj2.20062
spellingShingle Tobias Rentschler
Ulrike Werban
Mario Ahner
Thorsten Behrens
Philipp Gries
Thomas Scholten
Sandra Teuber
Karsten Schmidt
3D mapping of soil organic carbon content and soil moisture with multiple geophysical sensors and machine learning
Vadose Zone Journal
title 3D mapping of soil organic carbon content and soil moisture with multiple geophysical sensors and machine learning
title_full 3D mapping of soil organic carbon content and soil moisture with multiple geophysical sensors and machine learning
title_fullStr 3D mapping of soil organic carbon content and soil moisture with multiple geophysical sensors and machine learning
title_full_unstemmed 3D mapping of soil organic carbon content and soil moisture with multiple geophysical sensors and machine learning
title_short 3D mapping of soil organic carbon content and soil moisture with multiple geophysical sensors and machine learning
title_sort 3d mapping of soil organic carbon content and soil moisture with multiple geophysical sensors and machine learning
url https://doi.org/10.1002/vzj2.20062
work_keys_str_mv AT tobiasrentschler 3dmappingofsoilorganiccarboncontentandsoilmoisturewithmultiplegeophysicalsensorsandmachinelearning
AT ulrikewerban 3dmappingofsoilorganiccarboncontentandsoilmoisturewithmultiplegeophysicalsensorsandmachinelearning
AT marioahner 3dmappingofsoilorganiccarboncontentandsoilmoisturewithmultiplegeophysicalsensorsandmachinelearning
AT thorstenbehrens 3dmappingofsoilorganiccarboncontentandsoilmoisturewithmultiplegeophysicalsensorsandmachinelearning
AT philippgries 3dmappingofsoilorganiccarboncontentandsoilmoisturewithmultiplegeophysicalsensorsandmachinelearning
AT thomasscholten 3dmappingofsoilorganiccarboncontentandsoilmoisturewithmultiplegeophysicalsensorsandmachinelearning
AT sandrateuber 3dmappingofsoilorganiccarboncontentandsoilmoisturewithmultiplegeophysicalsensorsandmachinelearning
AT karstenschmidt 3dmappingofsoilorganiccarboncontentandsoilmoisturewithmultiplegeophysicalsensorsandmachinelearning